I tried to read through this once and was not very interested. I tried to read through it again and again my mind turned away.
One of the thing that bothers me is the extraneous talkin' in chat. I know that's the nature of chat. I know there are other people doing other conversations at the same time, and in a certain light, that's poetic, having these pieces of other people and topics come in to sprinkle the conversations you were trying to capture.
I also understand that the conversation that comes in the chat about health and health problems helps to serve as support for the poem that comes later, and I like how it acts like that base.
I like the idea of trying to communicate the way that poems can happen naturally, can curl out of conversations, and can be written by anyone anywhere. So like, I understand to a point some of the things you're trying to do and trying to communicate, but it didn't pull me in as much as a presentation of just the poem might have.
So, about the poem.
I love the first two stanzas -- they are perfect. I love that the first sentence in the second stanza changes form -- from "being" brittle to "having" vigour and vitality. It allows for a stronger, more concrete presentation of the words "v" and "v"!
The third stanza has some weirdly constructed sentences, like maybe somewhere a verb is not agreeing with a subject, but it still has words the work together to present a beautiful image of a free fall above water (for me, at least, and also mixed with cities and wind, etc.).
The first sentence of the fourth stanza doesn't say what I expect it to say. Is the storm -- the thing the speaker is fighting against, within their own lungs? I feel like that is contradictory and suddenly I get confused about the plot. I like the phrasing of half held breath, but maybe just apply it as a state of the speaker, not a description of the storm.
I also absolutely adore the idea of becoming a city to rise above this problem -- I could weather ages and ages and ages more if I were a city.
Lastly, while I kind of like the effect of Stella's addition in the script version, because it's clearly responding to someone who has gotten down on herself about age throughout the whole conversation, I don't think it works in the poem -- it's like whiplash at the last second.
Hope these thoughts are helpful!
PM or reply if you have questions/comments.
Good luck and keep writing~
Hannah
Points: 25864
Reviews: 1334
Donate