/removed.
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
This is such hot back humour, almost makes me wish I liked coffee. We've got the logic of Sade, the sardonic wit of Miriam Toews, Augusten Boroughs, of course, but actually the over all feel of this most strongly evoked Jean Genet, to me, which excites me, as "The Maids" is one of my favourite plays.
This is weak. Stronger or shinier, Sparky.
This and the paragraph before are quite good, I like your balance of the slick white-goods finish combined with these intricate subtle whoredoms of your knowledge. I seem to recall Rachel Klein writing something about people being born without skins, a bundle of nerves.
This is good, your societal commentaries are good, so why did you do this?
Eww. Hate that line. It's neither your intellectual whoredom or your shiny white goods cliches it's just stuck there in the middle.
Not entirely without merit.
Oh to your family scenes. Jeepers, they give me the creeps. Because so many suburban families are like this, the hypocritical grotesque melting fridge that they are. It's my family, for gosh sakes.
And there's the blow to the gut. Okay this is perfectly timed, structured, your rhythm, flow, balance, everything is perfect in your family crap. Absurd, surreal satire balances with the casual whoredom of descriptive skills, i.e. the fork thing which I liked particularly. Nothing to bitch about, so moving on.
Your mention of Jill in passing is very small-town, one of the many links to Toews here.
Cop out! Ditto with some of your other anythings. Give me proper nausea or give me death.
The E Coli gentleman was fine family fun, again, I see the absurd in you, and I loves it. Same with Servant Boy old lady, makes your flesh crawl, brilliant, brilliant satire, slashing the belly of society.
There was something I hated in the scene with Dylan but I can't remember what it was so it was probably an oozing melting hate.
Anyway. Keep being not entirely abominable. Over all six thumbs up and a carton of government cheese. Fine art, child, fine.
XD I thought this was awesome. Throughout this whole thing, I felt really sorry for Nick. Sheesh, his family is so...disfunctional! I didn't really expect that, which made this new and surprising.
And: Bisensual. Omg, I laughed at that for about two minutes straight. This just has comedy all through it. I loved it. And even when you changed it from funny to serious when he's on the bridge it was good. You put in a lot of great points that a lot of people think about and can relate to. And Ms. Carlyle, dude, she'd make me jump off a bridge I think. I really liked her character though, it just emphasized further how horrible Nick's life was. And you introduced Dylan well. He seems like a very nice character, I think that in the end, even if it takes forever, him and Nick will get along? Possibly.
I think I saw one sentence that didn't make sense to me...but I can't find it at the moment. Lol, when I do I shall tell you.
Post more!
~Rieda
Hmm... I really don't know what to say. I guess I'll start off with what I liked. Jill is a good character, you did a good job with her. You didn't over-do it and just told us what we needed to nknow, and brought her back at the right moment. Ms. Carlyle was great, an awesome character.
Now on to what I didn't enjoy so much. His 'fight' of sorts with Ms. Carlyle didn't seem believeable. He works there, right? So he has to be polite to the customers, even if they're mean to him.
You introduced Dylan well, but I don't think the character is very developed at the moment. Maybe you're just hiding it from us, but I really don't believe that there's much more to him.
Keep posting, though! I want to read more.
This beginning sucks. Throw it away and do not look back.
The rest was fun to read. Though the transition here was rather sudden and abrupt:
Does he storm out? At least give us a hint as to where he is for the last section.
I think that Ms. Carlyle is just about the most fun character ever. I want to say that Nick appears to change personalities with every scene, but I suppose in reality he doesn't, really. I think what changes is how much he narrates, in which case, I wish that in some places I knew more of what he was thinking. Another curiosity: why does he sleep in a sleeping bag on the floor at the end rather than in his bed? Or was his bed already ~contaminated by Dylan?
**Updated**
Braddy--
You're right. Augusten Burroughs has nothing on you. I don't have many suggestions to make as of yet--there's not that much to comment on, and it is a first draft--so I'll save that bit for later, and just beg you to bring Mrs. Carlyle back in the future. She's fantastic.
Nick, by the way, is incredibly sympathetic. I'd like to see more of his inner dialogue, though; the little you have is fascinating.
**Updated**
Well, I wasn't going to read this at first but then I changed my mind.
This is... different. I'm not saying it's bad, I liked it, but it's definetely not liek anything I've ever read. There wasn't really anything I can comment on, apart from the MC seems a lot more anxious in the first bit, and then totally calm for the rest.
I was a little confused about the first it. Was that like, in the fututre and he's remembering?
I did like it, the plot isn't anything I've seen before, so I'd like to read more. I'm definetely intriuged.
Ah, I see. Something else I noticed: I don't think he got dressed before going to breakfast? That seems a tad odd, even for this family
-Amelia
Amelia--
Thanks for reading more of this drivel! =]
In "book form" (as opposed to "post form"), the first part is more a glimpse of the future, not something immediately happening in the present. It is, in a way, a memoir-ish novel. The beginning, I suppose, is then just a cinematic tease for what's to come, if you will.
Thanks again!
Brad
I'm not sure whether to find this funny or strange... I think I'll stick with funny for now.
On the update: my first thought was "what in the world am I reading?" but then I continued and it began to make a bit more sense. However, I don't quite see where it's going past the narrator's immediate present, and had all the lovely character-type things not been set up/discussed in the process, I don't think I'd continue reading. Did the narrator's name not get mentioned or did I gloss over it?
Not quite what I was expecting to come after the intro, but maybe that's not such a bad thing.
**Updated**
I don't like this part, especially the first sentence. It just seems over-angst-y to me.
Surprisingly, this doesn't do too much (the action, not the writing) except hurt your knuckles after a while.
I very much liked the scientific descriptions in the middle, but the "This is the punishment, the penalty, for the living: you feel everything" seemed like a blunt way to conclude. [EDIT: but maybe I'm speaking too soon; I'd have to read more to really say, I suppose.] In general, actually, I thought that the first half was a tad blunt, and the second half was more... controlled [I liked the second half better]
So in all you used, maybe, five hundred words, but I feel like it was longer; not in a bad sense, but in the sense that I felt like I got to know the character better than I usually do after five hundred or so words.
The first paragraph plus the following line seemed more memoir-like, as if the narrator were looking back to set things up, but then it changes to present tense for the rest of the ~chapter. If this was intentional, maybe you could separate these two parts a bit more clearly.
I should hope you'll be posting more of this eventually? Good luck when you do,
-Amelia