Two Rocks Fell Side by Side

I won't be reviewing grammar, that's all easily corrected. I'll try to review and give feedback on the concepts your poem puts forth and the structure as those are what really makes or breaks poetry.
Conceptually the poem's opening is strong, it opens the page for discussion and further thought and establishes the romantic duo of the poem with the first word being "Two". The second line in a romantic context is very poetic, calling into question the nature of love, is it predetermined or coincidence, made by god or made by chance. Either way it correctly shows love as an accident, nobody chooses who to love, it just happens and you have little control over it, the two rocks need not to be explained in the same way that love needs not be explained. I feel like in the last two lines you used the word mind too close together twice, and the poem loses some potency. The second question continues the conceptual themes of inanimate objects being referred to as conscious beings. It contrasts the unmoving, silent tree with the scampering squirrel and singing bird. The trees are observers who must call into question a world they cannot experience, the world of movement. I think this is a reference to love's very observational nature, the distant questioning that every aspiring romantic must commit. The observer vs the observed is definetely a repeat reference in this poem. Love can be a one way interaction which I think is the strong implication here. Unconditional love is a strange premise for a romantic poem but I think you make it work. The metaphor of an inanimate object is truly accurate to some of the stone cold people in this world. Overall I feel like some rhymes were forced, and you purport to no consistent rhyme structure which is true, but I still feel only rhyme if you're willing to work hours on getting a rhyme that fits the context and doesn't sound off. For example
"No mind to the other was bent."
You had to do some heavy rearranging of that sentence to get bent to be at the end of it, and even then bent doesn't seem to be a very fitting rhyme.
Remember, don't sacrifice meaning and concise writing for rhyme.
That's all, if you want more feedback just reply and I can go in depth.

EDIT: I forgot to submit my review as review, its been a long time. I'm commenting again with a review this time.

Hey ElvenJedi! It's ScytheMeister here for a quick review

This piece is beautiful, it felt simplistic and free but I adored the imagery behind the words and the symbolism of the rocks. However, I found a slight grammar flaw (I might be wrong though) with this line: "Or to turn its gaze is just won't bother?"

I think it should be "Or to turn its gaze is just a bother?"

Other than that, I loved this! That last line "I'll let you know that you yourself, Will never be a rock to me." was my favourite of them all, it was such a powerful climax to a wonderful poem! Good Job

Keep Writing! <3

- ScytheMeister

I honestly have no corrections to make. Just to say that it's a very...free...gentle poem. I hope that makes sense. . It's very nice.

"So even while I realize

That you've no mind to dedicate

A single roaming thought to me,

I'll let you know that you yourself

Will never be a rock to me."

I have to say that this is my favorite verse. It tells how nothing is what it seems. Especially with a little imagination. . Keep writing!