Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
This essay is very advanced and you seem to know what you're talking about. Though this essay is a great way to get teens either not smoke or to stop smoking, not that many teens smoke tobacco anymore. In the recent years teens have been smoking marijuana plants. It's not bad like Tobacco but it gives off the same vibe and it's much more safer. I'm not saying they should smoke that, but if they don't want to die they should if they can't get off Of tobacco. Anyways the bottom line is this essay is ecstatic and I enjoyed reading it. You did a good job, especially with the sources on this subject. I Checked them out and I have to say they are very resourceful, maybe you could even do one on Cocaine. You seem very bright and I hope other readers think so as well. Good job
By this I think you mean that tobacco use is highly prevalent in young adults, or the statistics are surprising, but you kind of muddle those two ideas together.
You do not need (or want) the word "the" before "harmful substances."
In general, I have come to suggest to most writers (especially in professional settings), that the easiest way to quickly upgrade a work is to avoid the Egregious "P"s:
Particles (the, so, however, nevertheless, and, than - more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_particle)
Platitudes (common sayings; idiomatic expressions. As in "in terms of -" which may be the most egregious platitude of all)
Prepositions (that, then, there, before, behind, by... detailed list here: http://www.englishclub.com/grammar/prep ... s-list.htm)
So I will not point too many more egregious "p"s, but know they are often lurking.
The first sentence could be reworded (and shortened) to say "In my experience, teens..."
"The fact is" doesn't add anything to the work - it's kind of an egregious p.
This is redundant.
Tense agreement error: "effects... is."
Remove "thing" - it is another egregious "p."
Remove "and" as well. You can rewrite this to shorten and strengthen it.
"pretend not to" may be better as "pretend to not" - bringing "not" closer to the action it negates.
This is a very interesting factual paragraph, and the prose is pretty strong.
However, you do not have any inline citations - whether laziness or not required, I don't know. But it could help your argument to seem more credible.
This sentence is overly complex, and has not any backing (no reference, nothing).
Either you can back it up with a statistic, or delete it.
This is fascinating - an interesting idea, and one which you could thread through your work and explore as a possible explanation for teen smoking, but you do not really elaborate on this. And your parenthetical explanation leaves something to be desired.
Bring your actor closer to the beginning of the sentence. The subject is displaced. For instance, "To teens, tobacco is made glamorous and desirable by..." and so on.
Egregiousness!
"from the... side of things." Avoid using platitudes like this one - they detract from the individuality of your work.
Says who? You should back this claim - as it is, it stands empty and opinionated.
This is nonsensical. I think I understand what you are saying, but you need to seriously reword it to get around its grammatical problems.
Comma splice. This is all one sentence.
Intimidating. But remove "and possible" - it does not help to add anything to your statement, and, if anything, convolutes your sentence.
In a poetic or fictional work, a simple sentence can make a strong statement. But here, it floats emptily, and is actually detracting from your argument.
You bring invincibility back up, but still never explore it - a fleeting mention and momentary recall do not a memorable point make. But I think you can tie it together, and make this a very full sentence (because it has been a theme in your work, or it has been discussed in detail, etc.).
Never, ever, ever second-guess yourself in an argumentative essay. And you may not see this as second-guessing, but to suggest that your knowledge of the topic is limited is perhaps the greatest mistake one can make in argument (even though your knowledge necessarily is limited).
Overall
Altogether, a very good argument (although slightly trite), and rather good organization. It's the nuts and bolts - the tightening and oiling and testing - that you still have before you.
Also, what if I should argue retardation may not be caused by smoking? You should make sure you draw a serious line between correlation and causation, and you should be sure (at least in passing, if not with exact citations) to back up all your claims with the writings/publications/etc of others. (I don't know for sure that this is the case, but studies show that... blah blah blah).
Take with a grain of salt; mind the edges.
~Skorlir
Thanks, love! This is exactly what I needed.