Hi WritingWolf,
I am here as requested. I've done my best to follow your advice on what you wanted in this critique. I will preface this critique by stating that fairy tales, and the way they are written, are one of my least favourite types of literature. I have tried to prevent any bias going into this review, but it is something to keep in mind if you believe I am being too harsh.
My initial impressions are that this still needs a lot of work. It is a difficult story for the reader to get through. However, the idea is very unique. The concept is a good one. I really like the idea of turning the traditional expectations on their head and doing a reverse fairy tale. It's clever and there's a lot of potential here. So keep that in mind.
So, in no real order, here are my thoughts for what needs work:
Too much telling
The whole story is telling. There is no showing. I am sure, by now, you have heard the phrase, "Show, don't tell." It is pretty much the most commonly quoted guidance for writers. It has its caveats and it does not always apply, but as far as general advice can go, it is one I think writers should stick to most of the time. Why is it important? It means the reader gets to be shown the story and work thinks out on their own. This gives readers pleasure. Exposition and description means you rob the reader of this pleasure. Everything is stated as it is and there is no interpretation. There have been very very few successful stories or novels that have broken this rule.
But obviously this is a fairy tale. So you're thinking - I have to use all Tell! How else could I write it? Well, there are ways to ensure that you make up for the distancing effect of the narrator in a fairy tale by making the narrator and what they are saying even more engaging in itself.
What do I mean by this? Try reading some fairy tales written by Angela Carter. She is famous for rewriting traditional fairy tales with twists, in a similar manner to what you have done. However, even though Angela uses a telling narrative, and an ever-present narrator, she makes it engaging for the reader by ensuring the physical and emotional experience of the world we've been included into is "extraordinarily vivid." (Please see this page here - these words are not all my own. I very much agree with the author here, who talks about fairy tales at the bottom of the page. She explains it better than I could.) Angela Carter's work may inspire you to be able to include elements of showing, even in a telling narrative.
Otherwise, as it currently is, I don't care. I am not pulled in. I am given no details. Everything is vague and there is nothing to grab onto, or explore, or experience.
Lifeless characters
Just because this is a fairy tale does not mean the characters have to be dry and boring. I do not understand each character, I do not know what they all want, and I do not know why I should care about them. This is a serious problem with your story. If you want to make your story engaging, you have to make your characters real people, with problems, and motives, and idiosyncrasies. At the moment I cannot tell them apart.
We have a plethora of articles on this site about writing characters for fiction. I suggest you read some of them and rewrite your characters to be believable, living people.
Bad sentences
You asked for my opinion on your sentence structure. My specific advice is you have a tendency to write very similar sentences in a row - which makes it boring to read. You need to mix it up, using a variety of short and long, to create the correct pacing for different parts of the story. My favourite way to check your sentences and your pacing is to read your story out loud. That way you can sense where it sounds wrong and where it sounds right. Try it out - it will really help.
Examples:
Because there was no princess, the evil queen was not evil, Prince Charming would be a girl, there were only six dwarfs, the Big Bad Wolf would be good, there where no fairy godmothers, and frogs were not princes.
At the moment this sentence is a mess, because you are using commas incorrectly. As you a presenting a list, you could use a colon to set it up. Alternatively, I'd trade out the commas and split this into several sentences to make it punchy and dramatic. My two suggested rewrites:
"Because there was no princess, the land changed: the evil queen was not evil, Prince Charming was a Princess, the dwarves totalled six in number, the Big Bad Wolf was neither big, nor bad, the fairy godmothers never existed, and frogs were not princes in disguise."
"The land changed. The evil queen was not evil. Prince Charming was a Princess. The dwarves totalled six in number. The Big Bad Wolf was neither big, nor bad. The fairy godmothers never existed. Frogs were not princes in disguise."
Hopefully you can see how these are better. I also made some changes to the wording to improve what you were trying to say.
"No One was not a very smart man, if he was then that would have made him someone."
"No One did have one good quality, he loved his wife very much."
"Nothing saw what they where doing, but even though No One did not want them to she did Nothing. This was because Nothing cannot do anything, otherwise she would not be Nothing.
When Nobody saw them doing this, that was a different story."
The problem with all of these sentences if that you are using the comma incorrectly. You are trying to tie two different statements together with a comma, which is not what it is for.
For example -
No One did have one good quality, he loved his wife very much.
There are two statements that are linked. If you want them in the same sentence, you either need to rewrite this, or use different punctuation. Otherwise, you could put them in different sentences.
No One did have on good quality. He loved his wife very much.
No One did have one good quality: he loved his wife very much.
The one good quality No One had was he loved his wife very much.
I personally believe the last is the best option to solve your sentences with incorrectly placed commas. It is just a symptom of you not editing your sentences. This draft has a lot of rough sentences like this that need to be edited. I am not going to go through each one and tell you what to change, as that is a skill you need to hone yourself. Editing is difficult, so here's my one piece of advice: do not read generally the whole piece. Take a paragraph at a time. Take apart each sentence and work out what you are trying to say. Read the sentence and decided whether it could be said better. Attempt to rewrite it in another document, and see which you prefer. Test it out. Delete unnecessary words. And then pick better verbs. Better adjectives. Better, stronger words which can say what you want to say in the least possible words available.
Good luck with a redraft. Let me know if you post it on YWS and I'll take another look!
Points: 18178
Reviews: 1259
Donate