Girl, you sit on desktops,
cloistered in denial, amused by small
things.
Girl, girl with wonky teeth and studded
eyes
and leather-jacket hair, you sit in the middle
row;
you sit behind the boy with good grades and
higher ambitions,
and hope you will drown in his cacophony.
Girl, you and I are not so very different—
we staple ghosts to our faces and paint our
words
with bruises, and haunting melodies, and Pied
Piper sin.
Here's to never being seen, we say,
and we stuff our words in glass cages, an aviary
where we always forget the keys.
Girl, you are not a rebel, or the monotonous
humdrum
of a fly buzzing against glass when the window
is shut.
You are the tear in the lampshade, the chink in
the curtains,
the dust climbing rays of light, little paws
dancing golden.
You are tangents, and social anxiety,
and sitting in the rain without an umbrella
because you like the feel of
rainwater when it rushes down your back—
better, you say, than snakes slinking down your
skin.
You are big ideas and big dreams and a voice
not loud enough to expel them from your lungs;
but it takes
condition for storm clouds to form, and
time
for it to rain. You write litanies to
optimism,
and hide your face for fear people will see
it
and know who you are, that they
will see
your judgements as prejudice, and your actions
as malice against their ghost-written songs.
Girl, you have never understood the point of
kaleidoscopes,
if only ever to see things in symmetry.
And that's all right—I never did either. What is
the point
of trying to understand the beauty of a
reflection atop
a reflection, atop
a reflection,
if the colours never inundate one another
with their sorrow? The point of
kaleidoscopes,
in real life, I never understood—I see,
instead,
my palm, upturned, towards the sky, I see
flowers blooming in the white patches between my
veins:
lianas climbing clouds, a network of
vines&roses
and wine&roses.
Sometimes, I see you sitting in the middle
row,
behind the boy with good grades and higher
ambitions—
and I wonder if you see the lianas, too.
I wonder if someone taught you, or if you
learnt,
the way I did, that the only way to get paper to
feel anything
is to tear your nerves from your skin, strip
them
away, like branches on an ageing tree, sagging
skin—
hoist them up like suspension cables, and paste
them,
with german glue, in crooked lines on crepe
paper;
a collage, a simulacrum, disassembly
for things that would, perhaps, have been
otherwise left unsaid.
Here's to being heard, we say,
but never seen.
And yet, I see you.
You sit atop desktops,
bending low, shielding your face
as if that will stop moths from being drawn to
your light;
Girl, everyone is like this. Everyone.
Some people are lanterns on bumpy roads in
Victorian England,
others lighting sleek ferraris up in a
cage,
or coughing against museumwaxdollsandpaint.
Girl, you are disassembly. I see your eyes
cupping the sun, clouds hanging low
above its golden, glossy sheen. Your
lashes
are greasy motorcycle handlebars,
your hands are figure eights, upended bookcases,
twisted hearts on rainy afternoons.
You create magic.
Revel in it.
Girl, sometimes, I see you in me,
wonky teeth and glazed eyes and hesitant
glances.
You are not special, perhaps, in a way that
prepossess good grades
with regard to higher ambitions—or special in a
way
that commands curiosity, and breeds trust,
and coaxes loyalty from around corners—
but you are special, because you too
are kaleidoscopic.
[Between the mirrors is a hesitancy to be
reflected:
light swirls between the
beads, light
escapes
the carpal tunnel.]
Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Wow.
Wow.
Royal here with a review.
Which is to say Royal here with a WHAT DID I JUST READ
okay I'm fine I'm fine.
I hope you're not looking for an actual critique in this because I have none.
I just wanted to let you know how much this means to me.
Because for a bit there, the speaker sounded like they were describing my emotionally abusive ex-girlfriend, but in a way that I could handle and not fall apart while reading, and I really needed that. You'll never know how much I needed this. So thank you and I loved this and I want to read all of your stuff now okay goodbye
I mean LEATHER JACKET HAIR GOOD GOD I LOVE IT SO MUCH
i'm sorry I just it had to be said
Dang, girl.
I remember saying to you that you needed to focus more on your subject from the beginning. Well, you've done that, and you've created something really nice and coherent while still including your signature Pompadour imagery and flair.
I think that this would work well as a performance piece. It has substantial length, and I read it (in my head) in a "slam poetry" voice. If that makes sense.
The conclusion that the narrator comes to is interesting. The narrator describes this girl throughout the poem like she is a kaleidoscope. Or at least in my reckoning. She seems multi-faceted, and fantastic. I don't think kaleidoscope is the exact right image to use. Unless you're being ironic. Maybe something with more value to it that is also reflective? A gem, or a crystal, perhaps?
As always, I really enjoy your visual imagery. It's chunky, but good, using nouns as descriptors and liberal metaphor. I think that you need more non-visual imagery. Especially smell. Did you know that smell is the sense that is most associated with memory? If you evoke certain smells, the audience will connect to the poem in a more personal way. If you can evoke more than one sense with an image, go for it. I want to be immersed in the imagination of the narrator.
I'm not sure I understand the "high hair" image. I imagine a hippie, but then we get "high expectations," so perhaps I am not seeing it right. Instead of saying "high hair," perhaps compare it to something concrete. Is it describing the hair or the height of the person? I'm just a little confused.
I don't think the name of this poem is doing it justice. I see that it has some connection, but I think that the title needs a stronger connection. I think that something to do with kaleidoscopes would serve this poem better.
As poets, sometimes we use the all lower case a bit recklessly. I'm not saying you should do away with it here, but maybe think about the reason that you used it. I've been guilty lately of using it when I don't need to, but then again, maybe I don't need capitals, either? Just think about how the poem would be different if you used more conventional capitalization.
With the countertop and also sitting in the third row: I think you should pick one or the other. Allow girl to be anchored, at least in each stanza. Your poem is abstract in general, and we should have something to hold onto, even if it's just where girl sits.
Altogether, I really enjoyed reading this. With every poem, you're improving, Pomp, and I can't wait to see what you do next! I hope that this review proves useful to you! Happy poeting!