Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
This is very good!
I especially love the first stanza because the way you describe it creates perfect images inside my head and you descriptions are extremely good as well.
Another thing that I must say I love about your poem is that it's very original, and being original is a very good thing to be!
I must say though that some of your lines were rather long so maybe you could think about breaking some of them up into couplets or something like that. Just a suggestion.
I like the length of your poem as well. It's not to short but it's not annoyingly long either so that makes me feel happy on the inside
Overall I think that this poem was extremely well written, I love your writing style, your descriptions and the images you manage to create in my head!
Keep up the good work and I can't wait to read some more of your wonderful poems.
Keep writing x
Meg x-x
Love, love, love, love this first stanza!!! it's great with the rhymes, the flow, and the images.
the other ones are okay. i think you need better rhyme structure. just a suggestion.
This piece was interesting. I loved your imagery and use of description. Flawless. I believe that this poem deserves a gold star! Great job. I hope you write more poems.
Hiya Hannah!
I liked the beauty and frailness displayed here. Very nice.
Since I am now finished the judging for Elements of Nature, it's time to pull up all my entries to critique them! ^_^
I was judging on three items. How you portrayed the element, originality and structure.
Element: Very interesting choice here. I liked how you described glass. And I did take it, considering glass is/represents elements in some cultures.
Originality: Certainly at the top of the list here. ^_^ Glass as an element was a unique choice, although it did take me a few moments to figure it out. You pulled it off though!
Structure: Here is where I wasn't so happy. Once I got used to the long lines I was okay, and I did like how you used them to break up couplets, but they were a bit too long, you know?
Still this was a very nice work. I would enter more contests. ^_^
~Rosey
hi hannah..
i really like it.. i mean, i love poetry with a lot of descriptions.
okay, here i go **clicks**
there! a gold star.. (you're welcome)
so, i'm looking forward to your other works.
keep it up. i know you'll do a lot.
one question: may i ask why is the title "shattered"?
.god bless.
I love it, I think that the length of the poem is great too. I don't think you should change "in" and "dim", they don't exactly ryhme like they could, but I don't think that it messes up the rhythme. I don't know what you'd change it too either.
I don't think it messes up the rhythme either when some of the lines are longer then the others.
Ah, m'dear, it is only fair that my very own CBF gets my first critique as an Instructor, ya? Perfect timing to post a poem. You must have been waiting for my application to be accecpted.
Gasp! No, your perfect rhyming scheme set off-balance in the very last line. 'Rose' and 'echoes', although they appear to rhyme, actually do not. Why, you ask? Because of syllables. Rose, of course, has the emphasis on the ROSE syllable (the only syllable
Stupid English, I know.
Otherwise, this poem is really quite beautiful. You create such a heavy tone that we must wrap our minds around it to even degin to make sense of it, but it's not so heavy that we're trying to wade through a sea of jello. Which would require way too much energy.
My only issue is that I couldn't particularly tell that this poem is about nature. It seems more like a bunch of amaxingly eloquent phrases thrown together in a beautiful sequence, and that works wonderfully. But, since I already knew that Rosey's contest was about nature, that was the only way I could tell your subject. Then, realizing your theme, I could go back and pick out how all of the things you mention tie in with nature.
How to fix it? Put more nature, so hat we can tell what your poem is about without checking out Rosey's contest. You have 'sea' and 'fire' at the end, which is good. Now, could you possibly add a bit more of that? Wind and water, the clouds that float like lingering dreams...
Ya?
Hope this was helpful, dear, and see you around!
~Evi
Okay, admittedly, now I'm just going to troll through your writing obsessively.
I say again, I adore this.
The lengthened lines are a tad cumbersome to work with before you get the hang of them, but so is Poe, at times, and this gives me the distinct feeling that you have had a strong influence from Edgar Allen Poe, or the better of Frost's work.
I agree with your use of in and dim, as well. Perhaps not an exact rhyme, but very close assonance, and so, to my mind, just as good as an exact one. Indeed, it shows your ability to bring in another useful tool to convey what you're saying without having to radically restructure--and quite possibly diminish--part of the poem.
Oh, do so write more! I have a feeling we're going to be good friends.
Sincerely,
Tanner John Evans
All in all, these ideas you spilled on this paper (or binary system) are very good. I noticed that you have many motives and you use them carefully. But on the other side, this verses that are twice as double really ...try to shorten them or something... Keep up with the good work. *clicks star*