E - Everyone

Like a Rolling Stone - The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan

”People seldom do what they believe in. They do what is convenient, then repent”- a quote by a person who did, and, probably still does, what he believes in. Yes, he is no one but Nobel Laureate Bob Dylan. Born as Robert Allen Zimmerman, in Minnesota, Dylan was inspired by early rock stars like Elvis Presley, when he started writing and performing folk and country songs, towards the end of high school. While attending the University of Minnesota, he started using the name “Bob Dillion”, marking the start of his music career. In 1960, he dropped out of college and moved to New York. This was the time when his idol, the legendary singer, Woody Guthrie was hospitalised with a rare hereditary disease. He visited Guthrie regularly and even wrote “Song to Woody”, a tribute to his ailing hero.

In the fall of 1961, he started getting rave reviews in the New York Times which got him a contract from Columbia Records. That is when “The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan” took off officially, as one of the most original and poetic voices in the history of American pop music. He was probably one of the first persons to question that “How many years must a man walk down, before you call him a man?”- a question remembered and repeated by millions. As “The Times They Are A-Changin’” released, it established Dylan as the definitive songwriter of the 60s protest movement.

Bob Dylan was a man with a big heart, for sure, but also one which was given wholly to many. One of those fortunate human beings was Joan Baez, with whom he got involved during the movement. Another of his significant relationships was with his first wife Sara Dylan. When he clearly proclaims “Sara, Sara; Loving you is one thing I’ll never regret”, he simply spreads love all around.

Dylan again proved that he was a fighter, when, after a near-fatal motor accident in July 1966, he took a year to recover in seclusion. Delivering hits like “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall”, “Like a Rolling Stone”, “All along the Watchover” and “Knockin’ on Heaven’s Door”, he showed us all what music should be like. He has not only been honoured with Grammy wards, Academy and Golden Globe Awards but also bestowed with the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Nobel Prize in Literature, of late.

At the age of 75, too, he had to face quite a lot of criticisms for being awarded the Nobel. It is agreed that society has not yet learned to recognise literature in all its forms, but they can surely try and accept the plain truth. The truth that Dylan sang of love with a power of conviction everyone wants to own. He was no longer compared to Woody Guthrie and Hank Williams, instead to Blake, Whitman and Shakespeare.

With the public expecting folk songs, there stood a man with a guitar, combining the languages of the street and the bible into a symphony that would make us see the world from an absolutely different angle. In the most unlikely setting of all - the commercial gramophone record – he gave back to the language of poetry its elevated form, lost since the Romantics. Not to sing of eternities, but of what is happening around us. Thus, recognising that revolution by awarding Bob Dylan the Nobel Prize was a decision that seemed daring only beforehand and already seems obvious.By means of his works, Bob Dylan has changed our idea of what poetry can be and how it can work. He is a singer worthy of a place beside Ovid, beside the Romantic visionaries, beside the king and queen of the Blues, beside the forgotten masters of brilliant standards. If people in the literary world groan, one must remind them that the Gods don’t write, they dance and sing.

I believe we all can now say, that to make a difference, we should have faith in ourselves for a change. Deriving inspiration from this person, who brought the worlds of music and literature like no one else had, who protested as well as loved, who fought but never gave up; we can set out on the path we have made ourselves. Ending with the note that His Dylanness will be loved through ages, I proceed to find an answer to the question-

“How does it feel, how does it feel?

To be without a home,

Like a complete unknown, like a rolling stone?”

Comments & reviews · 2
Note: You are not logged in, but you can still leave a comment or review. Before it shows up, a moderator will need to approve your comment (this is only a safeguard against spambots). Leave your email if you would like to be notified when your message is approved.

User avatar
Hannah
Review
Hannah wrote a review · Sun Apr 30, 2017 6:41 am

Hi there, Sharon,

I'm here for a review. Sorry this piece has gone so long without another pair of eyes on it -- essays aren't usually as popular for whatever reason.

I'm always torn about starting and ending essays with quotes. A teacher once told me to never do so, because you're taking the power away from your OWN writing voice by letting someone else start and end for you. But on the other hand, it's been done so often and we can often feel such pleasure in finding just "the perfect" quote that it's hard to resist. I think you could compose your own original introduction better, though. Because with the way you've had to work the quote in, you end up with an awkward transition sentence like this:

Yes, he is no one but Nobel Laureate Bob Dylan.


Now, here are the three main points I get from this essay: I get a bunch of facts about his life that I forget soon after because I don't like memorizing dates, I get a bunch of lyrics or song names that I forget soon after because I don't have anything to connect them with, and I get the idea that Bob Dylan is awesome and deserves his work and people compare him to classical poets.

What I want from this essay is your opinion WHY he deserves his award. With any opinion piece, backing that up with evidence (obviously, it's not going to be scientific fact here, but strong arguments need to be made, still) will be necessary. Why did you choose to include information about his lovers, for example? I think I have a hint, because you seem to make a point on the love that Bob Dylan's music expresses. Maybe that's your main point. And in that case, the facts of his relationships can serve to support your main idea with evidence.

I hope these thoughts make sense to you and are somewhat helpful! If you have any questions or comments about this review, please let me know through PM or reply here.

Thanks for sharing, and good luck!

Hannah

Image

A lot has been said about Bob Dylan; and a lot will continue to be said about Bob Dylan. He's arguably one of the most iconic musicians of his era (if not all time), right up there with the Stones and Elvis and the Beatles.

Your essay starts out strong; beginning with the history of Dylan and his major influence in his music. After bringing up his first big break, things start to meander a bit.

For example; I found this paragraph to be a bit unnecessary

Bob Dylan was a man with a big heart, for sure, but also one which was given wholly to many. One of those fortunate human beings was Joan Baez, with whom he got involved during the movement. Another of his significant relationships was with his first wife Sara Dylan. When he clearly proclaims “Sara, Sara; Loving you is one thing I’ll never regret”, he simply spreads love all around.


You briefly touch upon the subject matter...but don't particularly go anywhere with it. Maybe the paragraph could have talked about the multiple women in his life. Maybe it could have talked about the many causes Dylan took up and stood for. Instead, it just brings up a random tidbit and moves on.

In fact, I found that paragraph to be an illustration to a major flaw within your essay: you bring things up, only to not really go anywhere with them. It makes the essay feel more like a random collection of thoughts and facts.

For example; later on in the essay you state

At the age of 75, too, he had to face quite a lot of criticisms for being awarded the Nobel. It is agreed that society has not yet learned to recognize literature in all its forms, but they can surely try and accept the plain truth.


Maybe you could have gone in depth and talked about some of the dissenting voices for his nomination, or why they felt he didn't deserve it (and then move on to a rebuttal of those rebuttals). Instead, it was just left as is.

The major point of the essay seems to be your thoughts on how Dylan deserves the Nobel prize, or how he deserves to be compared to all these literary greats. What you don't really talk about is why he deserves these things though. Again, you briefly touch upon it, with quotations of his lyrics, or mentions of how he "combin[ed] the languages of the street and the bible into a symphony that would make us see the world from an absolutely different angle"; but you never really illustrate what you mean by that. Maybe the causes he took up could have been discussed, or maybe a literary analysis of his lyrics could have been quoted. Instead, the essay just goes on to compare Dylan with many other historical figures.

There's the skeleton of a great essay lying within here; problem is that it's just that. You make certain points and bring up subjects that you don't really follow up upon. As stated earlier, it feels less like an essay and more like a random collection of thoughts and facts. If you choose to do a second draft, try to flesh out each point it is you make.

That should be all. I hope to see any improvements you make in the future.

Thanks for the suggestions... :)



Follow your passion. Stay true to yourself. Never follow someone else's path unless you're in the woods and you're lost and you see a path. By all means, you should follow that.
— Ellen DeGeneres