I am I am I am I am
if only I could scream louder,
she thought to herself,
they might know what I really am.
I could scream, scream, SCREAM
until my lungs burst –
oh, but that wouldn’t do any good.
the blood would drown my meaning,
and no one would see the bottom of the glass.
perhaps I could write a letter
to the nearest radio station,
finding her ballpoint pen,
with vindicating verbs and nefarious nouns
explaining myself to a T:
I really am…
and they could read it aloud!
no, no, I should do it all on my own.
what if I whispered to the grass?
no use, I know well what happened
to poor Midas! and what use is it to tell
the grass, when the grass never replies,
but only goes around telling falsities
about the truths it has been told?
no use, no use, the grass is no use!
I could write it like a speech or poem,
choosing the words and letters with great care,
and even which direction they go in.
holding the paper at an angle,
for|straight|is|too|uncomfortable,
yet
...............zig-zags
.....cramp
my
...............hands.
no matter, I should start where it is most important:
I am I am I am I am!
yes! a poem would be just right.
I wouldn’t even need to speak,
but instead everyone could read:
I am I am I am I am
as if they were inside my brain.
sighs and puts down pen,
only, now that I know which method to use,
I don’t know exactly what I am.
---
I easily went too far with formatting but it was much too fun and it felt right! This is out of the norm for me and slightly nonsensical, and yet it does have a deeper meaning if one looked hard enough. I'm not sure it's enjoyable, but I enjoyed it.
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
I think I'm missing something, so I'm not sure how much use my review will be to you, but I'll give it a shot. I love the first line, it really drew me in, and the constant narration is a nice touch. If you take the narrator as the speaker, it's very effective with the subject, but I'm not sure that's how you intended it to be read... I really love the last three lines of the first stanza. The longer sentences work well with how the speaker is talking herself down.
I love the second stanza. The insertion of the action is interesting, and I love the alliteration of "vindicating verbs" and "nefarious nouns". They emphasize the notion of someone trying to articulate their essence, but managing to be overly-reductive in the process. I love "and they could read it aloud!", especially how the excitement added by the exclamation mark is erased in the talking-down of the next line.
I don't really get the third stanza, but that's my fault rather than the fault of the poem. I really like "and what use is it to tell
the grass, when the grass never replies",
and the frustration of the final line of this stanza is very effective.
In stanza four I'd try "a poem or speech" and "the letters and words"...I just think it flows slightly better. I think that line three can be stronger. Maybe try something like;
"and even which direction they take". I love the next six lines. I think I'd berak the next line in two, before "where."
I think that the last stanza is a little weak in comparison with the rest of the poem, mainly in the last two lines...I get that they're important...maybe try laying them out differently, isolating them as;
"only...now that I know which method to use,
I don't know exactly what I am."
I think I'd put the last line in a smaller font. It would mirror the meekness of the speaker in defeat, and go with how you've been playing with capitals and layout and exclamation points during the rest of the poem.
Hope this helps!
Jas
Hey Suze!
I like it! It has a lot of you in it. It's modern, as someone above me said, which kind of makes it somewhat unique, somewhat.
Line by line?
if only I could scream louder,
she thought to herself, loved the italicization here.
they might know what I really am.
I could scream, scream, SCREAM increase in size was good
until my lungs burst –
oh, but that wouldn’t do any good.
the blood would drown my meaning, so here i'm a little confusing... the blood would drown my meaning? does that connect with the glass imagery in the next line? because i connected it in my mind, and that's not good. even if you didn't mean it to be connected--or if you did--i don't think it's good to have them sitting next to each other.
and no one would see the bottom of the glass. i am also very dubious about this image. somehow, when i think of the bottom of the glass, or seeing a glass, i think about half-full or half-empty... so this image confused me, and i didn't like it really... at all.
perhaps I could write a letter
to the nearest radio station,
finding her ballpoint pen, i didn't like the transition here. i guess it was too extreme, y'know? unlike the first one, this is a repetition and it's also not as startlingly original... maybe connect the line with -- or ; or () or [] or maybe just a period would suffice and then a comma at the end.
with vindicating verbs and nefarious nouns
explaining myself to a T:
I really am…
and they could read it aloud!
no, no, I should do it all on my own. i don't like this line... it's kind of... cheesy? i guess?
the rest is pretty good. i liked the whole idea of the i am i am i am. i also very much liked your word choice and many of your techniques were used well, like the zig-zaggy cramps and the italics and the size technicalities. i actually agree with ducati about this being more experimental than an actual poem... however, it was enjoyable to read and although not perfect, it certainly did hold a quirky charm as ducati said, a neat modernity.
Pretty good, and I don't usually get/review potery! *GIVES GOLD STAR!*
I loved this. It is one of those new, contemporary poems with hidden meanings and wonderful words. Your rhythm was perfect, and I liked how you put in her movements as well as her thoughts. I didn't really care for the first few lines in the first stanza, but the last contained excellent metaphors.
As for the formatting, well, I loved it. I don't think it is going overboard. It reminds me of The Princess Bride by William Goldman. Whenever someone fell it was :
DOWN
DOWN
DOWN
etc.
It just makes reading it more fun, having this creative kind of format.
Anyway, I loved it. Good work. I'm giving you a gold star!
~Sunny
Haha, this was cute. I liked it.
Okay, the capitalization drove me crazy. I'm a grammar nazi, so I think that the lack of capitilization really took away from the poem.
Anyways, aside from that, I really like this poem. It was cute and it made me smile. Gold star for you.
I think I shall start with a line by line lest you should get lost in my rambling comments =)
And now to try and ramble my way through what I think ^^ You've got a good poem here that I'm tempted to class as children's poetry but it's certainly open to the other ages as well. I loved reading it, found your persona to be delightful and there was something almost Dr Seus in your first aside that left a lasting connection with me. Never a bad thing to have but I don't know if it was intentional?
I think your formatting went a little too far when you dropped capital letters but all the rest I could quite easily forgive for some a quirky piece of writing. Your word choice is excellent and you've crafted this very carefully, sending just the right mesage out there. In brief, I love it. There are places where I think you could be even more clever, using flow to supplement your other format techniques, but you've generally got it under control.
Still think my critiques are helpful? XD
Heather xx
Thank you two so much! Especially Ducati. I took some of your opinions right to heart and I've already edited (though in my own way) and a few of them I'm waiting for other thoughts. I can be quite stubborn regarding certain things, hehe.

I do have a question for you two, and other readers: why does it seem so much like an exercise and not an actual poem? I certainly did write it with the intention of it being an actual poem. It just (and I know this clearly) lacks great, horrendous meaning on the surface. It's more like a contemplation or emotion slapped onto the paper - but it wasn't, to me, an exercise. I'm mainly curious what aspect leads you to think this and if it can be changed.
Again, thanks so much.
Ah, Suze, this is so funny. You make me laugh.
I won't even bother to critically analyse this because yours truly is finding it hard to take it seriously! But I'll give it a go...
Metapoetry (it does exist!) is very experimental and can end up falling flat on its face, but here you executed it brilliantly. I loved the boisterous, eccentric rebelliousness of the speaker and the metapoem format suited them perfectly. The alliteration in "vindicating verbs and nefarious nouns" further emphasised their pretentiousness and the fact that "vindicating" is used in completely the wrong context (it should be "vindictive," shouldn't it? Deliberate or accidental?) adds to the humour. This is a good example of what my literature teacher calls 'bathos' (sublime subject matter treated in a ridiculous manner, like "Mort aux Chats," my Poem of the Week the other day.) and I don't really see how you could improve it, apart from what the person above has said. (I hate to be so obnoxious but there's nothing to add or comment on, really.)
I do take the previous reader's point that it sounds artificial in that it's probably an exercise but we all need to let go sometimes, don't we?
Great stuff!
9.5/10
Right, I feel totally underqualified, but I'm a fool with an internet connection, so I'll review it.
I enjoyed, but at times it seemed more an exercise in poetry rather than a poem intended to connect with the reader.Still, it had a quirky charm to it, and was well written.