I’m positive that I’m late to the party on this one as I meant to review this one literal weeks ago but instead I’ve left the piece sitting in my Google Drive. This is Kays here for a review--let’s begin!
I harbor a storm
it looms innocently under my skin
small at first
but intensifying with every touch
until it consumes me
The transition between the first and second lines doesn’t work. In fact, while the imagery of the speaker ‘harboring a storm underneath their skin’ is interesting, the execution of the wording can be stronger. I suggest changing ‘I harbor a storm/it looms innocently under my skin’ to ‘I harbor a storm/looming innocently under/underneath my skin’ to make the transition smoother. Perhaps change the third line to be ‘a [storm/a synonym of storm to spice the vocabulary up] small at first’ to set-up for the last two lines of this first stanza. Overall while there are images being played around with that work but the diction seems to be a bit of a weakness.
can you hear the thunder in my chest?
every beat crashing louder than the last
can you see the lightening in my veins?
pulsing harder with every breath
can you hear the wind in my throat?
whirling away my words
The first two lines here--excellent. However, ‘lightening’ is spelled ‘lightning’ and ‘whirling’ in line six isn’t the strongest or best word that can be used in this case. I can see this being three separate stanzas if you wanted to go that route, either one after another or spread throughout the poem as interludes to the main stanzas, though that’s more of a stylistic choice to make on your part because there’s not a problem as is with this.
the storm steals itself from my grasp
taking with it any sense of self control i had
it is no longer you and me
but storm clouds joining
breaking through the calm front into chaos
There are four different uses of the word ‘it’ and one of ‘itself’ throughout this piece, with three of those occurring in this stanza and I have to say that’s about four too many. Why such an uninteresting word? ‘Storm’ is also used three times which is much smaller problem but why not use a synonym in there one or twice? Word choice can build the atmosphere of a piece--remember that. As for the main theme that’s gotten across, I found that to be lost in the last stanza, in a way. In the second stanza the word ‘you’ seems to be general but suddenly in the third stanza this becomes/turns into a ‘you’ that suggests another person. Why are the first two stanzas absent of this other person who I assume may be a friend or romantic interest of the speaker? I wanted more on that and I wanted more of the speaker's thoughts towards that person, and so on, otherwise I don't see why they're suddenly included in the piece. Overall, there's a consistent and solid metaphor throughout though this can use a bit of touching up.
If you have any questions, don't be afraid to ask! I hope I helped and have a great day.
Points: 220
Reviews: 1081
Donate