Currently being edited....
Open after reading. Is this story in anyway linked to this postcard?
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Comments and corrections in red, AM. :3
General comments:
You commit a lot of comma splices in this piece. I don't think I caught them all. Plenty of punctuation errors there as well, and I think I spotted a number of run-ons. Reading these articles might help you:
Punctuation within Dialog, by Demeter
Commas VS Semi-colons, by Evi
Commas, by Mythic Writing
I think I know what you were aiming for when you wrote this. You wanted the prose to flow, and to practically breathe, right? Unfortunately, you didn't quite accomplish that. There are too many clunky sentences and awkward phrases for it to truly take flight. I suggest you read your work out loud next time. It helps to catch stilted sentences that make the reader stumble. It'll improve the flow of your story, and better the prose.
Now, onto the narrator. Your narrator is depressed, and I'm not entirely against depressed narrators. Heck, I've read a book that was first person, with a depressed narrator. The difference between this story and that novel is that in this story, we're not grounded. We don't know why he's depressed, why he's all mean, and why he's acting the way he is. In fact, it's not even made clear that he's depressed until late in the story. I'd assumed he was a jerk earlier on, and commented on it. But his problem doesn't lie in his being depressed, nor in his tendency to be a jerk.
No, your narrator's voice just can't hold the narrative together. It's not strong enough, not compelling enough. It was kind of flat despite all the vague references to hazes. (Now that could have been interesting. It wouldn't hurt you to spend some time on it.)
I say this all the time, and I'll say it again. Your character needs to have a loud voice if you're planning to use first person. He needs to have a voice that'll make people want to stay with him for the entire duration of the novel/story. Would you want to stay in the mind of a bore? No, of course not. You'd like to stay with someone who has cynical humor, or maybe sarcastic wit, or a different way of looking at the world. Remember that the reader will be in this guy's brain for some time. The reader must find him interesting.
Third person is not evil, really. My favorite book is written in third person. Four other favorites of mine are written in third person. I hate more first person books than I love. Why? Because first person is incredibly difficult to pull off. I think this story will work better in third, unless you can find a way to make your narrator stand out.
The flow of this story is also choppy. I mentioned somewhere up there that the prose was choppy, but this time I'm talking about the story itself. The timeline is somewhat fuzzy, but that's not the problem. You have way too many breaks between scenes/thoughts that are a paragraph or two long. Try to smooth out the flow and take out a few of the breaks.
Your characters are shadowy figures, save for Trey. He has a personality, but we don't see much of it. That can be attributed to how short this piece is, so I'll let Trey slide. Samantha, on the other hand...Your narrator is supposed to be obsessed with her. Why isn't he spending more time musing about why she's purple, or why she acts the way she does? Samantha is nothing but a name, and maybe a a voice here and there. Not a real person. You need to give us something to work with. Right now, she's nothing but a skeleton with a muscle here and there, if you look hard enough. I want to see more of Samantha and her personality.
Finally, as for the story itself, yes, it does relate to the postcard. However, this story relies on emotional impact. You don't have that. It feels rushed, and we're not given any reason to adore any of the characters, or even sympathize with any of them. The plot is squashed. Surely you can spare more words? Work slowly with this. Immerse us in the story.
Also, you lack description, but I don't think you were going for that. I think you wanted us to feel strongly for the narrator, so I'll toss the lack of description up here as a point you might want to consider, but don't really need to.
I like the ending. Made me smile a bit.
Anyway, this review is built on my opinion, so it's nothing definitive. In the end, you're the writer, and you know what's best for your story. Take what you think is helpful from my review and discard the rest. ^^
Hope this helped!
Sincerely,
Jae
Hello Anger! 8D
Like I said to you, I didn't find anything wrong with it. I actually liked it very much
It was different, and I never read a story like this before!
I thought your begin was lovely =3. Over all, you did and excellent job!
Sticker for you! XD *stick a star sticker at Anger's story*
Keep on writing!
~Book Person~