The community has changed a lot over the years. In some ways, of course, it's still the same. It's still a very welcoming site, and it still does a great job at its core mission: promoting creative writing as a favorite pastime. But it’s also evolved. Back in 2005, the average YWSer was around 15 years old, and it stayed that way for a few years. By 2010, the average age started to creep up, and it’s been rising steadily ever since. Today, the average YWSer was born in early 2001, making the typical member 23 years old. For a site originally aimed at ages 13-21, that’s a big shift. Simply put, it’s not the Young Writers Society anymore.
This brings us to a dilemma: What happens to a site targeted to young writers when the average member isn’t a young writer? It’s a question I’ve been pondering for over a year, and I’ve had many discussions with the mods about it. After considering several viewpoints, I’d like to propose the following changes:
- Rename the current site to WriterFeed.
- Keep YWS as a sub-site of WriterFeed.
Renaming the Current Site to WriterFeed?
You’re likely familiar with the name WriterFeed because of WriterFeedPad, which was meant to be part of a broader site I started working on back in 2010/11. It didn’t come to fruition then, mainly because it was too much work, but the name has remained associated with YWS for over a decade.
This proposed name change isn’t about transforming the site. It’s about recognizing the current reality rather than creating a new one. The site rules, guidelines, and overall community feel would remain the same. We’ve already been operating with a broader appeal than the name YWS suggests, and this change would reflect that.
The new name would also help address some existing issues. We often get questions from members in their 20s or 30s, wondering if they’re still welcome, and this change would help clear up any confusion. Additionally, new regulations may come into effect in the next several years that could impact platforms like ours. These rules aim to protect kids and teens from some of the harmful aspects of social media, and it’s something we need to prepare for.
Keeping YWS as a Sub-Site?
Initially, I thought about simply renaming the site and leaving it at that, while keeping YWS for specific projects like the Young Writers Literary Journal, which I hope to relaunch next year. However, after more discussion, making YWS a sub-site would address many concerns and even create new opportunities.
Under this concept, YWS would have its own section within the larger WriterFeed platform, similar to existing areas like Forums and Roleplays. The YWS domain would direct members straight to this area, creating a mini-YWS with dedicated spaces for chatting, sharing literary work, and kicking back. All members could view it, but only those 17 and younger would be able to post, making it a space specifically for younger writers while still keeping the broader community together.
Technically, this will be challenging, but I think it should work. Younger members would have access to all areas of the site still -- it's only older members who would have some restrictions. This would give young writers the option to share their work either in the YWS literary area or in the broader WriterFeed site.
When Would This Happen?
This idea has been on my mind for quite some time. Initially, I considered making the change in 2023, then early 2024, and most recently, I shared with the mods a tentative date of January 1, 2025.
However, there’s no hard deadline. It certainly won’t happen before January 2025, and it will likely be sometime in the first few months of the year -- if it happens at all. Nothing is set in stone yet. I believe this shift is necessary, but it won’t work unless the community supports it. I can’t just declare it into being.
A Community Vote Will Decide
Before anything changes, there will be a vote. Every member will have the opportunity to voice their opinion, and the change won’t go forward without clear community support. Personally, I’d prefer a super-majority of at least 60%, as a narrow margin doesn’t feel right for such a significant decision.
The voting method will be discussed further, but one option is to have votes submitted as posts to ensure fairness and avoid any issues with online poll manipulation. Voting won’t begin until there’s been plenty of time for discussion. Ideally, I’d like to start on December 1, but there’s no rush -- if we need more time, we’ll take it.
Closing Thoughts
Please use this thread to share your thoughts, concerns, and to discuss it further.
