John Smith

25 posts1, 2
User avatar
Gender Male
Points 32885
Reviews 2058
First, I'd like to thank my Father for the idea to do this. Second, I would like to thank everyone who calmed me down yesterday/today, otherwise I wouldn't have been able to calm down enough to write.

I haven't gone over it and looked at anything, I don't think I'm in much of a critiquing state. But any comments are greatly appreciated, though nothing may happen to this in a while. Think of it as a short burst of distraction for me.

----------
John Smith
Disclamer:I don't know anything about the process of Name Change yet, I scanned a little information. If someone would like to inform me better, it would be lovely.

A plain man sat in the Court House, waiting for his name to be called. I say plain, because there was nothing surprising about this man. If you saw John Smith (the normal man I speak of) in a crowd, you would not want to know where he worked, who he married or what he had done with his life. It did not matter to you or to anyone else. He looked like a Joe Smoe or a John Doe, though the normality of “John Smith” fit him just as well.

The only strange thing about John today was that he wanted to change his name. The other odd thing was the spoon he held. It was a spoon, yes; but why the spoon? No one else had spoons, in fact of the five or so other occupants of chairs (Maybe drug users or ex-convicts if you will) held in their hands papers and forms and the occasional bible but no spoons.

The room didn’t even present the option of spoons, with signs like “No Food or Drink,” and the receptionist behind her desk who looked like she was pensively chewing gum and pushing papers, it was better to leave the spoons at home. Unless of course, you were going to use it to threaten said receptionist into stopping the awful chewing noises she continued to make, but even then a spoon would not be your best choice.


It was not long before John Smith was called back, spoon being carried as if it was a prized position.

Seated in the court of law, he began to explain his name changing wish.

“What would you like your name to be, John Smith?”

He held up the spoon with a graceful lift. “This,” John said, hoping the judge’s eyes would wonder down to what he held.

“Spoon?”

He shook his head and again showed them the spoon, “No, this.”

“Yes, spoon?”

“No, not ‘spoon’ the name, ‘spoon’ the object.”

The judge coughed, showing signs of nervous confusion. “I’m not sure I catch your drift.”

John lowered the spoon and sighed heavily as though this was an explanation he had made many times. “You see the spoon I’m holding? I want my name to be that. But not the word ‘spoon’ or the name ‘spoon’ but the actually object.”

“But you can’t say objects.”

“Yes, I know.”

“But…Aren’t names for saying? What will they call you?”

“I’ve thought on this one,” John said proudly, as if it meant something finally, “The man formally known as ‘John Smith’.”

The judge seemed to be cursing, but the words did not leave his mouth. “So, the object, ‘spoon’ is your name?”

“Yes. Get it?” John smiled brightly

“Well yes but—are you sure?”

He nodded, “More sure about this than anything else.”

“What should we write on the documents?” the Judge asked hesitantly.

“Spoon? The Man Formally Known as John Smith? What ever you like.”

“I mean…It is an object.”

The Documents were signed as, “Spoon (object)” and John Smith was no longer John Smith. One may think that the normalcy following the man formally known as John Smith might have faded, but one would never know. His looks did not change; his personality neither. He did not marry someone else, or get a new job. In fact, if it has not been for his name, John would still be the same person.

The only change was that, when out at clubs, which the man formally known as John did not do much to begin with, girls struggled to get a grip around his name and denied his request for digits. But, thinking back, that wasn’t much of a change at all.
Last edited by Emerson on Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“It's necessary to have wished for death in order to know how good it is to live.”
― Alexandre Dumas, The Count of Monte Cristo




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 10087
Reviews 701
I dont know anything about name changing either, so sorry -- cant really help you there. But I will crit just the same LOL.

Overall, I quite liked this. It was funny, but it was also rather confusing, until the last line anyway. I'm assuming you're saying something about the way names objectify things, and that people named John Smith are always forgotten? Or something? I dont think I fully grasped the message, but this is possibly because I'm feeling particularly thick today :roll:

Anyway. I'm just saying that perhaps you could...I dont know. Explore it a little more so that the reader (i.e. me) is sure they understand you properly (without, of course, coming right out and saying it straight LOL).

One small thing I had a problem with (aside from being confused) was this line: He looked like a Joe Smoe or a John Doe, though the normality of “John Smith” fit him all the same.

I dont think the "all the same" idea fits...Perhaps, "just as well"? And perhaps change "normality" to "banality" (but this is me being fussy LOL).

Otherwise, certainly an interesting read. If I were sure I understood it properly I'd have more to say I think but that's it for now :lol:

Cheers,
~bubbles
Got a poem or short story you want me to critique?

There is only one success: to be able to spend your life in your own way, and not to give others absurd maddening claims upon it. (C D Morley)




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 9907
Reviews 506
I'm sorry; I can't think of anything to crit with this, so I'll leave that to others more skilled in the sacred art of critting.

Instead, I'll say what I liked about it:

The idea is so randomly absurd, it really worked for me. The narrator's voice - reminiscent, in some ways, of Pratchett - fits the tone of the story well.

Ooh - the critting side of me has just thought of something:

'“I’ve thought on this one!”'

- I don't really like the exclamation mark. To me, it makes it sound as though Image is shouting, rather than sounding exicted.
I wrote the above just for you.




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 32885
Reviews 2058
Bubbles: Thanks all the same, and I think you are looking into it too far into it. This is actually a joke on Prince and when he changed his name to an unspeakable symbol. More than any real..."saying something about the way names objectify things, and that people named John Smith are always forgotten" I was just trying to make a Joke :-D

Sureal: Merci. Loved the little spoon icon :-D I'll change the sentence. BTW: Who is Pratchett? Never read him, lol.
“It's necessary to have wished for death in order to know how good it is to live.”
― Alexandre Dumas, The Count of Monte Cristo




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 5890
Reviews 504
I loved it, Clau. ^_~ I wouldn't be able to write humor when in my best frame of mind, let alone in the middle of anxious worry. ;)

I liked the introduction best of all, with the receptionist and the gum, Smith and the spoon. ^_^ I actually laughed out loud - so random and ridiculous that it was great.

One question:

The Documents were signed as, “Spoon (object)” and John Smith was no longer John Smith. One may think that the normalcy following the man formally known as John Smith might have faded, but one would never know.


Now is that 'the man formally known as John Smith' or is that 'the man formerly known as John Smith'?




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 9907
Reviews 506
BTW: Who is Pratchett? Never read him, lol.


Terry Pratchett is one of the best selling British authors, beaten only JK Rowling. He's the author of the fantasy humour/satire series, Discworld. He also has a beard.
I wrote the above just for you.




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 20
Quite funny. He wanted to be the object spoon. Is there going to be more?
"This was my first bus ride."
----Ardeth Bay from the Mummy Returns




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 3762
Reviews 201
This was remeniscent of Prince's awful symbol name.

The only things I can point out are the use of formally v. formerly, and "actually" in the line "But not the word ‘spoon’ or the name ‘spoon’ but the actually object.” should be "actual"

Otherwise, I was curious as to what struck the man to change his name to be an object.




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 4890
Reviews 516
I really liked this Claud, I felt that it was really funny(I had gotten the Prince idea at the end of your post LOL) But also it had that strange and confusing feeling of 'Meet Joe Black' if you've ever watched it. I loved how he was so sure and no one ever really caught on. This was Hylarious and also very amusing in a good way. Great job!
I love, love.
*This wonderful crit is brought to you by CCF!*




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 32885
Reviews 2058
Thanks all.

Yeah DD, I'm...surprised this got out. Or anything got out at all. (Just woke up from another random sleep cycle)

My ll's and my ls', I'll have to fix those... Thanks for pointing them out, those who did.

[qotuote]Quite funny. He wanted to be the object spoon. Is there going to be more?[/quote]

Should there be more? Of this particular story, or more satire? This, I think, will go no further but... I can try to work myself around more satire at some point in time. I want to (When life settles down and resumes what normality may be left) try to work on my novel at a better pace. So...We'll see.
“It's necessary to have wished for death in order to know how good it is to live.”
― Alexandre Dumas, The Count of Monte Cristo




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 10087
Reviews 701
**shrugs** Well I guess that one went whooshing straight over my head, LOL, since I have no idea who Prince is. Sorry!
Got a poem or short story you want me to critique?

There is only one success: to be able to spend your life in your own way, and not to give others absurd maddening claims upon it. (C D Morley)




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 1106
Reviews 614
lol - a strange piece but amusing none the less. Grammar is sound, I have nothing to correct.

I can imaging this on stage or on TV in the form of a sketch.
Previously known as "Phorcys"
Witherwings Harry Potter RPG




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 1940
Reviews 29
bubblewrapped wrote:**shrugs** Well I guess that one went whooshing straight over my head, LOL, since I have no idea who Prince is. Sorry!


I think Prince is that artist who changed his name to a symbol...strange! Though because the symbol couldn't be written down, he was know as the 'Artist formerly known as Prince'.

Oh...back to the 'Spoon (object)' I loved it! I agree with the fact that it's very Prachett like though i've only read one Discworld novel.

Tj
***The Jesseble***

Cheese Hat




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 32885
Reviews 2058
:-D

This is so awkward for me; not one major problem!

*feels successful* though it was rather short...

Who thinks I should take up more satire?
“It's necessary to have wished for death in order to know how good it is to live.”
― Alexandre Dumas, The Count of Monte Cristo




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 690
Reviews 1
I'm in the process of getting my name changed right now, actually! I really don't know if it is done in the same way in every state/country/etc., so the following, as far as I know, is only applicable toward CA.

First, you have to get yourself to the county superior court house, where you are given a "court order" form (which is not the proper name, but I can't recall). You fill it out-- why you want this name, etc. etc.-- and hand it into the clerk with the processing fee.

Then, the court publishes your names (current and hopefully future) in the papers for six or eight weeks, to insure you aren't attempting to change your name because of criminal reasons. After that, the judge would review your case- on paper!- and most likely sign the form.

You'd then take the form and get to the SS office, passport agency, and all that other horrible stuff to become re-documented.


As for a critique:

-I would rework the first paragraph. You're mixing first, second, and third person points-of-view, and that technique generally doesn't work well. The first "you" might be changed to "any one," etc. The paragraph is also unnecessarily verbose and redundant in a few parts-- for example, we know what plain means, so there is no need to say that there is nothing surprising about the man.

-The only strange thing about John today was that he wanted to change his name. The other odd thing was the spoon he held.
So that isn't the only strange thing about him.

-He held up the spoon with a graceful lift.
"Held up" and "lift" is redundant. "He held up the spoon gracefully"? "He held up the spoon with a graceful sweep of his arm"? Also, in the same sentence, it's "wander" and not "wonder."

-I liked the ending a lot. It has a certain wry quality that is endearing to the reader.

All in all, I would say that a quick read through would eliminate most of the errors, especially much of the homonym-type. Work on your wording and some of the redundancies. Your dialogue flows seamlessly; very nice!



I tell the neophyte: Write a million words–the absolute best you can write, then throw it all away and bravely turn your back on what you have written. At that point, you’re ready to begin.
— David Eddings