I am totally confused about "what is right & what is wrong?" as these things keeps on changing from person to person,place to place ,time to time & in lot more perspectives.two persons may judge the same incident in different ways ,A thing which is considered to be right in one country may be considered as wrong in another country and a fact which is considered as right at some point of time will not be considered in the same way at some other point of time. We can take a hell lot of combinations & examples in this subject.
And my ultimate question to myself is "DOES RIGHT AND WRONG REALLY EXIST?"(are they really such things called right & wrong)
Everything is right until it is proven as wrong and vice versa. What is RIGHT? & what is WRONG?
Right is what we believe to be right & wrong is what we don’t believe to be right.
Right and wrong are the matter of belief .we believes something as right because we may have solid grounds to do so or maybe we are addicted to follow what majority believe to be right /wrong.
Regardless of what is right or wrong, something will always remain constant (or looks like constant) that constant is CALLED truth.
Truth is always right because it will not be CALLED truth if it is wrong. If it is proven wrong then ‘It is not truth’ but not truth may be false.
All rights are not truths, but all truths are rights.
Sometimes ' A Right' will be considered as truth by mistake. The difference between right & truth lies in fact & belief, but it does not apply if we believe a thing as fact just because it is right.
Truly speaking right & wrong do exist, until we believe in them.
Note:Everything mentioned above is true because I believe it to be true,and please don't say to me that i am wrong just because you believe it to be wrong (may be tomorrow your belief will be proven as wrong and same may happen in my case.)
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Yo nice little chain of thoughts you got here. I won't say you're wrong, although I find it strange for someone to post an idea like this online and then not expect both negative and positive feedback. Anyways I'll share a bit of my own though on this subject and be as brief as I can.
What you speak of are norms. Norms for right and wrong which were instituted by a loooong period of human history. Law didn't come to be over night, nor does "law" of any country represents that which is truelly "right". It's is simply a sistem to keep the world functioning by the methods of rewards and punishment. So you can pretty much take all that crap and throw it away.
Truth, Right/Wrong It all originates from you, from an induvidual and his understanding of the world around him. If the budist monk sitting on his mountain truelly believes that he will be reincarnated again and that gives him internal peace -than that , for him, is TRUTH.
Also if someone is certain that what he does is right and no means of persuassion can turn him away from it- than that is RIGHT.
Theres no such thing as universal truth or justice- Its all about the induvidual.
Hey,
You clearly have some interesting views here as well. I like this piece of writing because it really makes the reader stop and think about it, and maybe even reevaluate their views on life as well. There are some grammar errors that should probably be fixed as well. I feel this poem incorporates both science and spirituality which can be a very explosive thing to write about. But you did a nice job with it here. Looking at it like this however some people may disagree with in situations such as murder, robbery, assault, and stuff like that. Simply because everyone wants to blame someone if its their fault or not. Personally I would like to see this in a police case where the only evidence towards a person is a eye witness statement. Kinda like in the Bryan Case, Police case. Anyway really great writing I look forward to reading more of your work in the future. I really love your point of view on life. Great work.
I get where your going here...I think. I'm a little confused as to how exactly this is a poem tho. It doesn't meet my criteria for a poem. Looking past that, beautiful use of punctuation. Any writer who bothers to use punctuation is instantly cooler
Sincerely,
Collideascope
Hi there!
So, I think I understand what you're trying to say here. Or, moreover, the question you're asking. But the way you've worded this is a little ambiguous and hard to follow; I know you probably meant it to be that way, but you could clean up the grammatical and structural errors and that would help a bit.
What I've gathered is that under all the "rights and wrongs" there is an underlying truth for us to discover? Once again, I'm having a hard time discerning what you're trying to say here. If that is indeed that point you were trying to make, then I agree with you. Someone may label something as "right" but it could not be truth at all. Or, vise-versa. A true "right" is when we discover truth.
But, how are we, fallible humans, to know what is right and wrong and truth? I don't wish to start a debate here, but let me just say that the ultimate source of truth is the Bible, and that is how we know truth, and therefore right and wrong. There is a way to know right and wrong (they do exist!) and it is in His Word.
P.s. welcome to YWS!!!
~WritingforHim