i once saw a scientist
on television.
and she was speaking generally
about science things
(being a scientist and knowing science things
etc.)
and, speaking generally
i am not a science
person,
and while i respect them,
i do not have much interest
in scientists
or science things.
so i went to switch the channel
at the precise moment that the presenter sitting beside the scientist asked:
what,
in your opinion,
is the most ASTOUNDING fact
about the universe
?
and this stopped me.
because it is not often that television presenters ask such interesting questions,
and the scientist was pursing her lips in a thoughtful way that made me think
i wanted to hear her answer
to the interesting question.
after a pause,
she did not look directly at the
camera,
but directly at the presenter.
did you know,
she said,
that there are atoms in your body.
the presenter laughed.
of course,
he said.
what else would my body be made of?
well,
said the scientist,
and i did not need to look at the television screen to know
she was smiling.
do you know where those atoms came from?
well,
said the presenter.
and he did not say anything else.
i snickered from my place in the armchair
and the scientist smiled again.
the most ASTOUNDING fact that i have ever known,
she said,
is not a fact, specifically,
but the story of every atom on this planet.
the ones that make up the grass and the sea and the sand and the forests and the human
body.
these atoms came
from stars.
the presenter sat forward and so did i.
stars,
continued the scientist,
are mortal
like humans.
they die,
and, in their later years,
are unstable.
it pains me a little to say it, but a star’s death
is far more dramatic than a human’s.
is it? asked the presenter.
the scientist was looking at him still,
and i felt strongly as though i was listening in on a very private
conversation.
it is, the scientist nodded. the stars
i am referring to,
she said,
collapsed and exploded a very long time ago, and scattered their enriched guts across
the entire universe.
here, she paused, and her words caught in my mind in a way that made me wonder
if she was a scientist
or a poet.
their guts, she said whilst sipping from a glass of water, were splayed across every
inch
of time and space.
these guts were made of the
fundamental ingredients
of life and existence.
carbon and oxygen and nitrogen and hydrogen and all the
rest of it.
all in the bellies of these stars that flung themselves across the universe in protest when it was their time to die.
and then? asked the presenter.
the scientist’s lips quirked upwards. and then, she said.
it all became parts of gas clouds.
ones that condense and collapse and will form our next solar systems -
billions of stars with billions of planets to orbit them.
and these planets have the ingredients of life sewed into the very fabric
of their own lives.
so, she said, smile still playing on her lips -
where do your atoms come from?
from those gas clouds, said the presenter.
no, said the scientist.
from those stars.
every atom, every molecule, every inhale and exhale and beat of your heart, is traceable
to the crucibles that cooked life itself.
and you are sitting here and so am i and so are your viewers at home,
and we’re all in the universe, aren’t we?
yes, said the presenter.
but i’ll tell you what’s even better, the scientist smiled wider.
the universe is in us. your atoms and my atoms and your camera men’s atoms came from those stars. you’re connected and relevant without even having to try. you are made of stardust and the fabric of the universe.
that is the most ASTOUNDING fact
i can tell you.
the presenter smiled and the scientist smiled wider and i smiled too,
and later i switched the channel to something less scientific
and wondered if i should feel small,
tiny and insignificant in relation to the stars that collapsed and exploded and
threw themselves everywhere.
and that is how my mother found me,
sitting on the sofa.
and she asked me what was
wrong,
and i said,
nothing. i’m just a lot smaller than stars are.
my mother is very literal woman. as such, her natural response was:
of course you’re not. don’t you see how small stars are?
that’s only from a distance,
i said.
maybe you’re looking at yourself from a distance too, she said.
and she left the room and it is years later now, but i still
think about the scientist and what she said
and my mother and what she said
and i still see the presenter on television.
and i still think that the stars are very big
but now i think,
they are in me.
so i am big too.
A/N: Lack of capitalization is a stylistic choice. I hope you enjoyed.
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hey, I'm here to review!

I like your narration. I feel like this is your strong point, apart from the many meaningful messages you've written here. I'd make a proper review by giving the pro and con of your poem but I can't since I enjoy it immensely.
Just a suggestion, I think the word "astounding" doesn't have to be capitalized, and instead is better to be italicized. The scientist is more likely to emphasize it rather than speak it in a loud voice, which the capitalization seems to indicate. This is admittedly doesn't affect your poem much whether you stay this way or not since the focus a reader would have here is all over it.
Keep up the good job!
Hey disillusioned,
Even I am not a science person. So when this started, I was about to change the page, just as you were going to change the channel. But then went on as something in here was gripping, astounding :')
What your mother said was just as beautiful as what the scientist said. And usually I'm a punctuation freak but I love that you chose to style this one without capitalization. Something about this anecdote that I can't probably fathom why, is charming and magical. <3
Happy writing!
-Ishita Dutt
Also, here, I'm pretty sure you meant "hear her", not "her her".
Ooh, this was so beautiful. Your style (lack of capitalization, mostly) added such an amazing effect (affect? Bah) to the poem that just made it 'pop' out more.
I thought this part was especially beautiful (among a few others, but I really liked this).
Your word choice was also nice, as was the flow: not too choppy, but not lullaby smooth, either.
I liked the generality at the beginning - it was a nice intro and it was just a nice touch to the whole poem as well. I'm afraid I have no constructive criticism! I just thought this was a job well done and deserved a nice comment. ^_^
Keep writing!!
~ EternalRain
I really liked the style you wrote this in. And this poem was all space themed basically (as you can see I love space aha)
Have fun here okay?
I love how you spaced out each line and made each stanza unique. This is realistic I love it.
This poem is telling a story and I really like that.
And just like good job on writing this I love it!
This went really deep at the end and trust me I am all for getting all deep on just about anything. So like good job ahh.
I really like your punctuation choices. And overall word choice. Please write more soon!
Also welcome to YWS