Published March 19, 2011
-
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hi there.
I did really like this. I don't think I've ever seen poem (if you could call it a poem) that uses a list and numbering like this. So I do have to applaud you for taking that risk.
However it can also be its downfall. As I said before it's hard to call it a poem.
But the language is very good. Very rich and satisfying.
So good job.
CUTTING UP RED BELL PEPPERS.

I remember that.
When you're hitting flow just right, there's something else you need to keep in mind: whether what you're saying actually sings. I'll take this part by part:
Flow is good. FIrst line doesn't stand up to much, and nor does 'sentient pets.' Replace with something that really means something -- in the case of the first line, make it something that is more inventive; a much more original point of difference. In the case of the second, keep the beat of the lines but change the words 'sentient pets' which sound too ugly for this. But last couple of lines are great -- just the right amount of ambiguity slashed with certainty to keep us wondering.
Similar wording problem in the first line -- the flow is fantastic; the words themselves are not. The problem is originality. We know about their sex. Now, tell us something different. It only gets better at 'how you only make love with the blinds closed' -- but it is a marginal change. I want variety here. Something even more striking, quirky, bizarre. Surprise me.
Again, last couple of lines were good. I like the newness that 'innards still winding, still counting down the hours' and 'light...cutting up the bodies' provides. I never thought of it that way -- and you know what? This is when I love your writing the most -- when you present to me something I think I know in an entirely different manner.
Not bad, not great. Perhaps leaning too much towards the very-obvious-and-I-should-have-suspected-this-in-the-first-place-love-triangle -- and you know I don't like to be let down by lack of surprise like that. I don't like how predictable this is getting. I think you need this part there, somewhere; you just need another section before it, something to distance us from the immediacy of the two men; something to pull us back before getting back to the present again. This is too close, for too long. Keep the balances tipping.
Hee, this is why I used those red bell peppers in the first place. There's something weirdly...weird...about them that added just the dash of originality that the scene needed. I want your 'stars are just stitches of light, holding together the sky' metaphor to work properly -- it's beautiful, but also does not stand up to much thought. Make it work. Make it work seamlessly. Make your mad logic work -- that is what I find more dazzling than a halfway-there metaphor.
Cut this para at 'your jaw to remind you that she loves you.' That's the bang. The rest is frayed ends, loose, chapped, fairly meaningless and songless.
Read Siken's 'Dirty Valentine' -- see how he intersperses the blatantly predictable with the unpredictable? I like the idea of grins splitting faces in half, and I originally misread 'showerhead spits at you' as 'showerhead splits you' -- the latter of which I prefer. Use these and magnify them, amplify them. The rest doesn't grab me. Mold what does.
Actually, in some ways I feel like there's almost no room for the woman in this. It's too short, too focussed to have her as anything more than a mere mention, a memory, a ring in a pocket. When you collapse the aesthetic distance this quickly between the reader and her character, it seems a little bit like singing nursery rhymes in the middle of a pop song -- a kind of 'bizarre' that I don't appreciate. Too odd. I almost don't care for her, and I think I know why: the MC's focus isn't really her -- or, at least, hasn't been introduced to be her in the very beginning. It's almost too late to shout out, BUT HEY HE HAS A WIFE or that he cares about her in any way. We're too entertained by the melodrama of the two men to care about what seems to come across as a 'side-issue,' despite the fact that it probably isn't one.
If that makes any sense.
Oh no. I almost didn't finish this review on account of this ending. You end your other paras so spectacularly; why not this? Why not the very end? Keep working at it -- it dangles fairly shoddily as it is. Doesn't do much justice to the parts in your piece that did sing.
Regardless, we need a title change.
PM for comments, discussions, questions.
Navi
Not much to say about this, but I rather loved it.
One bit that sounded interesting was the difference between the girl and the guy... the girl seemed to be described more like a photograph or memory. While the guy was always present and there, the girl was always described passively, even if she was doing something aggressive (like, with the knife). But I liked and appreciated that because it gave her a softer, more feminine quality.
Nice poem!