Possessing this thing has made men go mad.
Obsession calmed their minds like the slaves they owned.
Weak humans can't help hold this poisonous hunger at bay. If only
Every man would find that even power hides in weakness. Then
Rare it would be that man would go hungry.
Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
YASSS YOU GO GIRL
Hay! Glad you found the sight. Thanks for the uplifting comment!
Radrook here a once again to offer some suggestions.
Apologies if i offend. It isn’t my intention.
Please feel full free to cast aside all things you deem not helpful.
But if you do be sure its true by being extra careful.
That having been said:
I like the way that you are able to create a message around the letters that spell power. I also like the way you highlight the letters so that the reader can see exactly how the acrostic works. Power can indeed corrupt and can indeed be an obsession. We have plenty of historical examples that clearly demonstrate that. So the poem points out something that is not controversial but sometime that the reader readily agrees with in a general way. It can only become controversial if we make unqualified statements.
Creating an acrostic and making it sound accurate and poetic at the same time isn't easy. That's for sure. Number of lines are limited by the letters and the letter of each word starting a new line must be specifically the acrostic one. So it is like a tightrope walker trying to stay true to balance and you are to be commended for accomplishing this.
Sometimes it can be done and it turns out to be poetic and at other times it might fail to be poetic enough. In short, we might have to discard many attempts before hitting upon the right one. On some occasions my first attempt is perfect. I seem to be inspired and everything falls neatly into place. But with acrostics I have often found myself in a serious struggle which involves repeated reorganization and word shifting before finding the right balance.
On other occasions what I write is clearly not poetic and is merely prose arranged in an acrostic format. I get the sense that as a poet I need to keep searching and have stopped too soon. But then again if poets such as Robert Frost have to do it, who am I to feel that I don't? So it isn't lack of talent involved-it is merely the need to try to refine what's on the page. Fortunately, sometimes I find that all it needed was adding assonance, alliteration, rhyme, off rhyme, metaphor, simile. Adding some of these to the
composition further distances it from prose which is good. At other times the concepts themselves are flawed and I have to discard whole sentences and start again.
Suggestions
If it were mine, I would seek to polish it a little more by trying to include assonance, alliteration, maybe some rhyme. Please keep in mind that in poetry less is more. So removing all unnecessary words will be a good idea.
The use of the words "man" "men" and "mankind" might be seen by some women as male chauvinism. They can be substituted with words such as ""people" "persons" "humanity".
The following line seems to say something other than what was intended. Removing the word "help" would fix it.
Weak humans can't help hold this poisonous hunger at bay. If only
[Weak humans can't hold this poisonous hunger at bay. If only]
The last line would harmonize better with the context if it read "hunger for it" or "crave it" or "strive for it". You know, for the power.
Thank you. Your criticism is gladly taken. I am not the poetry type most of the time. This poem just came to me. I knew it was not perfect. If you would like I could work on the poem and send you the revised edition.
That would be fine.
Hey Satrena! I'm Elinor, and I'm here to give you a review on your poem. I love acrostics. I used to write them all the time. I also like your choice of topic. It's definitely a loaded one, but I still think you manage to say a lot with only a couple of lines. I like that you don't get too specific either, but it's still clear what this is about.
What I felt was missing was a sense of rhythm. It feels a little bit choppy just to read out loud, and I think you can pare down some of your lines. For example:
While in theory I like the reference to slavery, I don't know how well it fits into what you're trying to do here. Also, I'm not sure if obsession would be a way to describe the relationships that masters had with their slaves? Your message here is essentially that power corrupts, that I think you can keep it more broad rather than refer to any specific instances throughout history.
I was also a little bit thrown off by how the first two and last line were complete thoughts and the other two lines were cut off. This sort of structure can work, but I would try to bring it together a little bit more.
Other notes:
I like this line, but I think "humans" is redundant. You refer to "man" at the beginning of the poem, and I think we'll understand that you're still talking about the same subject. I also wasn't sure about the significance of your last line. Does it mean that some people go hungry because of the greed of others? I wasn't sure.
I hope this helps and wasn't too harsh. I did like your poem. Good work, and please feel free to drop me a note if you have any questions.
All the best,
Elinor
Thank you. Your criticism is gladly taken. I like your revision ideas. This is exactly what I am looking for when I post things. It will be a work in progress but I will try to fix the flaws. If you would like I could work on the poem and send you the revised edition.