Society Only By Name- Part Ten: Neutral Ones

131) Thus far, the society of neutrality appears like a mere utopia, on par with every other idea commonplace in the pseudo-society. It is a solution which is not radical, and is a solution, so is ignored by both conservatives and radicals.

132) A growing movement of neutralists has been emerging for some time. They aim to move society forward to cater for all needs, without prejudice but without forced socialisation. They want a marriage between idealism and pragmatism.

133) There is no ideology for neutralism. There is none in particular, at least, but if a neutralist had to be defined or labelled under popular jargon, they would fit in comfortably under the centre-leftists. They oppose most right-wing ideologies in regards to nationalism, or status quo, but also see through the façade of the far-left. They recognise that their opinions are entirely the result of their perceptions, passed down from other perceptions. In other words, they know that they are human. They are happy nihilists, perhaps more absurdist in nature than that. They are becoming the new dregs.

134) They have the darling's charm and sharp tongue, except are not possessed by the selfish desire to be loved by faces without distinct features. The neutralists are willing to make art and make acquaintances with those who, whilst not necessarily agreeing with them, are subtle and have a thick enough skin to tolerate opinions

135) One may be excused from not listening to a neutralist. However, the neutralist should not be silenced because no-one agrees with them.

136) The neutralist does not see eye to eye with homophobes, racists, sexists or those who discriminate against another's social position. However, they accept and uphold their right to speak on these issues and espouse their rhetoric. It is thus inevitable that neutralists are accused of conforming to these ideas, by those who refuse to understand them. By only being aligned to their respective wills to power. their own minds, the neutralists are largely panned by the top end of the pseudo-society whilst defended by dregs and satirists.

137) Like atheists, neutralists are too loose a group for a study in specifics. It appears much easier to sum up the unknown under one moniker than it is to study the unknown.

138) Oh, you shiver in your shoes! Are you terrified at the sound of a changing society by eventuality as opposed to sudden, cut-throat transitioning? Or scared of change at all? Don't worry, there will be a place for you in the society of neutrality, as there always was.

139) They are not religious, but are not anti-religious. They are not particularly impressed by politics or certain ideologies, but will never annihilate them. Their only annihilation is the annihilation of false truths, of forced societies, of a social divide. No one is equal to the neutralist, but no one is different. There is only mere variation to them, which is not that noticeable. It is only with work that one finds themselves and finds others.

140) All we see so far, amongst the neutralists- in the context of the darlings, the dregs, the pop-culturalists, the satirists, the inclusive and exclusive, the post darlings, the religious and the hijackers- is an abyss. It is a dark void of uncertainty. It is not a perfect solution. However, perfection does not exist either, and the neutralists are the only promising future for any society. Beneath the darkness of the abyss one might see, orchids bloom. These orchids will bring together a new society.