I know that novel names are suppose to be italized, but copy and pasting over takes away all formatting that I have, and I don't have time to go through and re-italize them. So please, do not think that I was to lazy not to do it.
The works of Mary Shelley and Emily Bronte have been classified as classics for years, and they hold a strong tie to the elements of the literary periods that they were written in. In addition- Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, and Wuthering Heights, written by Emily Bronte, are both gothic era fiction novels. Additionally, both plots are both full of twists and turns creating a suspense that is encased with gothic elements. Shelley and Bronte both utilize high emotions, supernatural occurrences, and weather to highlight gothic elements while using metaphors and vivid imagery to help achieve that.
Throughout their novels, these two authors place a love story between adopted siblings into their pages. Both Shelley and Bronte use that romantic love between siblings to illuminate the high emotions that is present in all characters. In Frankenstein, Victor is in love with his “cousin”/adopted sister Elizabeth. The two eventually marry based off of the plans that Victor’s mother had in place. “I, with childish seriousness, interpreted her words literally and looked upon Elizabeth as mine- mine to protect, love, and cherish.” (Shelley, 21) At this presentation, Victor saw her as bound to him, with him being the only protectors that she would need. he also claims that she is to be his only until death separates them. “No word, no expression could body forth the kind of relation in which she stood to me- my more than sister, since till death she was to be mind only.” (Shelley, 21)
Additionally, in Bronte’s novel, Heathcliff is in love with the sister he got when Mr. Earnshaw adopted him into the Earnshaw. Likewise, Catherine loves Heathcliff just as he loves her. “ “... I have not broken your heart- you have broken it- and in breaking it, you have broken mine.“ (Bronte, 181) Heathcliff is telling Catherine that it is from her own actions, not his, that she has a broken heart. He goes to tell her that while her actions broke her heart, they also broke his own. “So much the worse for me, that I am strong. Do I want to live? What kind of living will it be when you- oh, God! Would you like to live with your soul in the grave?” (Bronte, 181) He then ends it by asking, how can he live if part of his soul is missing. Heathcliff and Catherine both believe that they are each other’s soul. Catherine had said, “...my love for Heathcliff resembles the eternal rocks beneath- a source of little visible delight, but necessary. Nelly, I am Heathcliff- He’s always, always in my mind- not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself...”(Bronte, 100) This illuminates the fact that both Heathcliff and her think that they complete each other. Catherine is telling Nelly of the close bond that Heathcliff and her share. She feels incomplete if he is not around. He is always with her even when they are apart, because he is in her mind. Through use of a metaphor, Bronte makes the love between Cathy and Heathcliff on a spiritual level, for she ‘is Heathcliff’ and not ‘like Heathcliff’.
The use of gothic elements do not end there though, likewise the use of the supernatural occurrences are seen throughout the novels, with Shelley’s being focused around the monster and Bronte’s being focused around Catherine’s ghost. Victor’s vision for the monster is first seen in the fourth chapter of the novel. He was first exposed to the new sciences- natural sciences, something he had never learned before going to the university. “Remember, I am not recording the vision of a madman. The sun does not more certainly shine in the heavens, than that which I now affirm is true. Some miracle might have produced it, yet the stages of the discovery were distinct and probable. After days and nights of incredible labour and fatigue, I succeeded in discovering the cause of generation and life; nay, more, I became myself capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter. (Shelley, ) When Victor was first exposed to natural sciences, he learned about life and death, and what happens to the body after death. It was after lectures from his professors that Victor decided to make a creature of his own- off the remains of the deceased. “His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful!--Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun white sockets in which they were set, his shrivelled complexion and straight black lips.” (Shelley, ) In the fifth chapter of the novel, Victor has spent years trying to put together a human being, and succeeded on a stormy night in November. Shelley, with the use of imagery creates a horrid description for the creature who was an unnatural thing to walk the Earth.
Meanwhile, Bronte uses the supernatural occurrences to show the relationship between Catherine and Heathcliff while also showing what life can be without their other half. The first show of the supernatural occurrence that happens within Wuthering Heights is the first appearance of Catherine’s ghost the night of the snow storm. “....knocking my knuckles through the glass, and stretching an arm out to seize the importunate branch; instead of which, my fingers closed on the fingers of a little, ice-cold hand. The intense horror of nightmare came over me; I tried to draw back my arm, but the hand clung to it, and a most melancholy voice sobbed, ‘Let me in- let me in.’” (Bronte, ) This is the scene that shows the ghost of the older Catherine. Her ghost is first seen by Mr. Lockwood when he is shown to her rooms by one of the staff of the house. It is after seeing her that he cries out, drawing Heathcliff’s attention. Just after the second case of a supernatural occurrence, we find Mr. Heathcliff sobbing and crying out for the ghost of Catherine to haunt him. This is where the reader first sees the emotional and subconscious connection that is between Heathcliff and Catherine. "He got on to the bed, and wrenched open the lattice bursting, as he pulled at it, into an uncontrollable passion of tears. 'Come in! come in! he sobbed. 'Cathy, do come. Oh do - once more! Oh! My heart's darling! Hear me this time, Catherine, at last!' (Bronte 25) This quote happens in the third or fourth chapter of Wuthering Heights and it is right after Mr. Lockwood had a nightmare in which the ghost of Ms. Catherine Linton was seen. Mr. Heathcliff came in response to him crying out with fear, and then his actions led to this once Mr. Lockwood told him about seeing the ghost of Catherine.
Both authors use storms to create a deeper meaning into the scenes in which they are created in, suspense and horror are just two feelings that are felt by the reader. Weather is used throughout both works, to create tones for scenes and to get more development into characters. Shelley’s weather was first focused on Mr. Walton’s journey with his letters to his sister and then shifted once she started to talk about the monster. Her use of the weather was to make the monster seem more brutal in nature and something that had to be destroyed. Bronte’s use of weather conditions are used to give more background information about the families and then to describe the feelings of everyone at Catherine’s death scene. Bronte’s use of the weather marked the change of mindset in the people of Thrushcross Grange and Wuthering Heights. It is in the letter’s that we learn that Frankenstein is to be told in a Frame within a frame story. The weather in letter four leads us to the discovery of one man running across the ice, and the discovery of a man who chases after him. “Last Monday (July 31st), we were nearly surrounded by ice, which closed in the ship on all sides, scarcely leaving her the sea-room in which she floated. Our situation was somewhat dangerous, especially as we were compassed round by a very thick fog. We accordingly lay to, hoping that some change would take place in the atmosphere and weather.” (Shelley, ) This scene’s weather is important to setting up the basis for the rest of the novel. In Letter number four, this is where the members of Captain Walton’s ship first meet Mr. Frankenstein, and it is where his story begins.
When the reader is first introduced to the monster, it is a dark stormy night and sets the tone for most of the next chapter. “It was on a dreary night of November that I beheld the accomplishment of my toils. With an anxiety that almost amounted to agony, I collected the instruments of life around me, that I might infuse a spark of being into the lifeless thing that lay at my feet. It was already one in the morning; the rain pattered dismally against the panes, and my candle was nearly burnt out, when, by the glimmer of the half-extinguished light, I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open; it breathed hard, and a convulsive motion agitated its limbs.” (Shelley, ) In this scene, it is at the start of chapter five and Victor had finally given life to his monster. He was excited to see what it would do, but it was after he gave it life that he was terrified that he made such a monster. He is disturbed by the appearance of his creation, and it terrified by it. “While I watched the tempest, so beautiful yet terrific, I wandered on with a hasty step. This noble war in the sky elevated my spirits; I clasped my hands, and exclaimed aloud, "William, dear angell this is thy funeral, this thy dirge!" As I said these words, I perceived in the gloom a figure which stole from behind a clump of trees near me; I stood fixed, gazing intently: I could not be mistaken. A flash of lightning illuminated the object, and discovered its shape plainly to me; its gigantic stature, and the deformity of its aspect, more hideous than belongs to humanity, instantly informed me that it was the wretch, the filthy daemon, to whom I had given life. “ (Shelley, ) The weather turned into a storm the night that William was just outside of his hometown. He was waiting for sunrise to be able to go home after hearing about the death of William. He was shocked and angry at seeing the thing he created out there. With the use of imagery, Shelley managed to manifest an image of a very misshapen man.
Bronte uses the weather in the second chapter to create two chapters in which the reader sees more of Mr. Heathcliff’s behavior to those around him, and then the ghost of old Catherine. “This spectacle drove me back immediately; I took my hat, and, after a four-miles' walk, arrived at Heathcliff's garden-gate just in time to escape the first feathery flakes of a snow-shower. /On that bleak hill-top the earth was hard with a black frost, and the air made me shiver through every limb. Being unable to remove the chain, I jumped over, and, running up the flagged causeway bordered with straggling gooseberry-bushes, knocked vainly for admittance, till my knuckles tingled and the dogs howled.” (Bronte, ) In the first two paragraphs of the second chapter, Bronte not only used the weather to drive Mr. Lockwood back to Wuthering Heights, she also used vivid imagery to make the scene of the storm dark and dangerous. This storm is what causes the storyline to begin, first starting with Mr. Lockwood’s dream of the ghost of Catherine in chapter three. It is here that the weather comes to play an important role in the events that will come throughout the novel. After the death of the elder Catherine, the weather shifted, going from the traditional weather of summer into the patterns that are traditional during winter. In the evening the weather broke: the wind shifted from south to north- east, and brought rain first, and then sleet and snow. On the morrow one could hardly imagine that there had been three weeks of summer: the primroses and crocuses were hidden under wintry drifts; the larks were silent, the young leaves of the early trees smitten and blackened. (Bronte, ) The use of the strong weather change in the novel after Catherine’s death signifies the ultimate change that stretches from Thrushcross Grange to Wuthering Heights. It marks the strong shift from the mental revenge that Heathcliff sought to the physical revenge that he throws to Edgar. Bronte uses strong imagery to get across the fact that Catherine was gone and everything was going to change.
Gothic elements played with metaphors and strong uses of imagery were tools that Mary Shelley and Emily Bronte used to put the nature of their novels into the world. They put a strong hold on the use of weather, the supernatural occurrences, and high emotions, both authors have placed a strong love story between their characters inside their novels. The story of love, revenge, and hatred are shown strongly through the actions of all characters as they develop throughout their plots. With two authors who have created such a suspenseful plot full of twists and turns, it is no surprise that their novels have become classics and are taught in classrooms nationwide.
Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hey Weather here with a review.
This was an interesting essay topic. Those are books I've heard of but haven't quite read before so It was informative. I can tell you've put in a lot of effort and time into writing this. I have a few suggestions for you that may be of help to you.
I know this is an essay, but it was a little on the long side which was fine I guess within reason, but personally I would only use the points that add most value to get the message across quicker but still in an eloquent and cohesive matter, to still keep the reader engaged with what you've written and to keep track of the text.
"The works of Mary Shelley and Emily Bronte have been classified as classics for years, and they hold a strong tie to the elements of the literary periods that they were written in. In addition- Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, and Wuthering Heights, written by Emily Bronte, are both gothic era fiction novels."
I think this was a good introduction but it started to waffle slightly and for people who have never heard of these books or authors, you should be more clear about the topic discussion. You could just write the last names of the authors after you initially mention their full names. There were also quite a few commas misplacements in your second sentence, they got a bit too much which made the line drag.
I'll just give you a summary of the main points I think may be of help to you:
1. I think there is a slight tendency here to retell the stories, explaining the text briefly should be fine.
2. I think "gothic era" was one of your main focus points in comparing them, if not try expanding the essay on aspects other than that.
3. A stronger conclusion is needed in my opinion, it should have summarized, compared and contrasted the two texts and your opinion on them would have been nice to see too.
Hope I was of help to you.
-Weather
This totally isn't that long xD I think I've seen longer. Anyways, onto le review!
Disclaimer: I haven't read Wuthering Heights, so I'm not much help. But review I shall.
You use "gothic elements" twice in the same paragraph. Avoid doing that. Use other words to signify this instead of repeating earlier sentences.
Remove the quotation marks. This flows better without them.
Protectors should be singular form, so protector*
Capitalize the h in he.
I feel like "family" should be at the end of that sentence.
Silly double quotation marks.
Okay, so I do recommend you break some of these paragraphs up. They're so bulky that they come across as intimidating and hard to read.
I think this was a very good essay! You had a thesis that you backed up with clear supporting information, examples, explained parts from the two novels, and quotations from the novels that were cited appropriately. I adore the last part especially, since you correctly cited the authors and the books and if I wanted to go find this section and read it, all I need to do is find the page number you've given me. ^^
Overall, this was really good. Hope you got an A on it!
I hope this helps.
~Iggy
Hello! I'm here to save this essay from the green room!
This was written well as far as I could tell. I'm not sure what exactly your teacher asked for, but it reads like something my English teacher would tell me to write. I'm going to say right now that I have read neither of these books, so I won't judge your accuracy.
First off, there were minor grammar mistakes in here.
In the intro:
That should be Gothic Era fiction, capitalized.
"He" needs to be capitalized.
You forgot to close the quotation marks.
And there are other things such as this, but I don't want to spend this whole review correcting your grammar.
Your evidence seemed pretty concrete to me. I don't have much to say about this.
I wish your thesis was only one sentence long, but then it would be one heckuva thesis. Is there any way for you to par it down a little? You can put *the bare minimum* of your thesis into one sentence at the beginning, and then you can expand on those points in your thesis (one sentence per paragraph/idea) in "developmental statements" that come after your thesis. So basically, what you have now, but take the bare ideas (only a few words) and put them all together in one sentence at the beginning of your intro, and that would be "the thesis."
You did an okay job at this, but make sure that every introductory sentence for each paragraph houses the point you're trying to make for that paragraph. What are you trying to say? That this author utilizes this? Then say that.
You also did a pretty good job at explaining "Why" (just in general) in the last sentence of each of your paragraphs. Take another look, just to make sure that each is explaining why to your liking. That's the purpose of end sentences, y'know.
I reviewed this like I have been taught, if you've been taught another way, that's absolutely fine.
This read as a pretty good, and interesting essay. You cited relevant quotes, and did a nice job organizing it, I think.
Good job, keep writing!
~fortis
Hola Tulip!
I don't usually engage with non-fiction works, but for you (and the green room) I shall do my best!
This is an interesting essay and I wonder what your prompt was for this. Right now this is a comparative essay to be sure, but I find your analysis lacking. We have far too much recount to justify your quotes and not enough actual interpretation and critique of the text itself. Not necessarily critique, but... an indepth consideration of the topics at hand. You clearly chose gothic literature to be your focus (I assume this is the topic your class is exploring) but I find that your ananlysis of the themes, concepts and techniques to be rudimental.
This isn't to say what you have written isn't interesting, it is. I just think that it could definitely be better. Several times you go on about what character did what in surprising detail - cut back on the detail and give us more analysis. Why does the ghostly appearance of Catherine reflect a gothic novel? What makes Frankenstein's monster such an affront to nature, where is your contextual analysis? They come from two separate places as well, Frankenstein is a thriller and Wuthering Heights a romance, does that alter how we view these texts even within their gothic connections?
I think that you need more clarity, less recount and more analysis here. It is clear to me that you can do it - this essay is by no means bad, and it is structured fairly well (I wouldn't end a paragraph on a quote unless you are entirely certain you have addressed its contents beforehand). So this is a success in many ways. Also decide if it is the third or fourth chapter, and if you will call Elizabeth his cousin or his sister, and try not to use "got" in an essay, it's ugly and there are better words. Especially as Frankenstein isn't "given" Elizabeth so much as she is adopted to the family. (I am not sure she IS his cousin? I thought she was a young child living there but not related to them, they pay the family for her?)
In any case! If I were marking this on my presumed criteria out of 20 you'd probably be sitting on a 14-16. Which isnt a terrible mark but you could do better, I think. Hope this has helped! Thanks for posting.
- Pen
Hi Tulip! Lucrezia here for a review.
So, I believe this kind of thing isn't what you normally write, but I must say, you have a definite talent for it!
You managed to keep the whole piece quite interesting, which, needless to say, some articles/essays are not. I haven't read either Frankenstein or Wuthering Heights yet, but this made me want to read both.
You wrote everything in a very clear, understandable way, and the parts you referenced worked quite well to accent the points you made. Your choice of wording was great. Everything was written very factually, to the point, and in such a way that it holds the reader's interest.
I don't have any real suggestions, just some dumb nitpicks.
"Classified" and "classics" sound a bit odd together. Maybe change "classified" to "considered"?
"Gothic" and "elements" is just a bit repetitive here.
H in "he" should be capitalized.
I'm pretty sure the bolded word should be "mine"?
You don't really need to capitalize the E in "earth" here.
Otherwise, this was wonderful and a very interesting read!
Great work and keep it up!
Yo! Alvarin here to review
Also, I don't know if you're writing this in high school or college or any other type of school, but since I'm studying at a university I though I might as well talk to you as if you're at that level, because it surely won't do you any damage.
You don't need to say "both" twice here, so you can remove the latter one.I recently had to write quite a similar essay for school, so I thought it might be interesting to read and review this. I'm going to write this review much like I'd write a peer review to one of my classmates, and I'm not sure if your school/teacher expects the same thing of you as they do of us, so if some of the things I say are clearly stuff that doesn't apply to you, then just ignore it
So, first off I'll just
mentionrant about the structure. Introduction, with the classical "this essay will treat the subject of --- and try to prove/show that ---". There's no such introduction here, and instead you jump right in and start it, but I do believe that even though you might not need a big formal introduction and then method you could at least give a small one where you introduce your subject and the purpose of the essay. Doing that makes it easier for the reader to understand what they're reading, why they're reading it and where you're going with the essay. I've always been told that every essay needs a good thesis statement and topic question somewhere in the beginning, that one should relate back to in the end and try to answer, but I can't really find this. Once again, this is to show where you're going what the essay and what it will be about.After the introduction and the method the real thing usually starts, "the real thing" being the main body of the essay, and that's where all the info goes, and based on that info you then move onto discussion and conclusion. For this part I think you've done an excellent job. You've done a very clear and thorough comparison and analysis that is easy to follow.
I do think you need to take a look at the paragraphs. In an essay each paragraph has to have a purpose, as in, they all have to show separate ideas. To make it clearer what the idea is in each paragraph one usually starts out with a topic sentence, the topic sentence could also be in the middle or the end of the essay, but it needs to be there. You have a few paragraphs treating the same idea, meaning that they should actually be together rather then divided.
So, in conclusion, you wrote a good analysis and comparison, but I think the essay falls flat since there is no thesis statement or topic sentences. It lacks purpose, and I think that id you could add that it would take the essay to a whole other level.
A few nitpicks (I did find more, but I think you'll discover them just by reading through the essay again):
Capital H here.
"into the Ernshaw family" maybe?
What you talked about above weren't really gothic elements, but rather elements typical to the Romantic period, or the genre romance.
No need to mention what chapter it is, you already said it was on page 25. (Also, as I'm pretty sure you're already aware, some of the page number after the quotes are missing.)
No apostrophe here.
You forgot the quotation signs here.
Oh, and also (though you're probably aware of this too) the list or works cited is missing.
Anyway, well done. It was an interesting read
Hi..this was written for my advanced placement english class, so this is what I came up with on my first try at something so long.
And yeah, I need to go back to the books and find the page numbers- for I found the quotes using an online version of the book.
Our teacher never mentioned the fat of works cited, as the only two texs we would be using are the books themselves.
Oh, I see
I definitely think you should thrown in a works cited list, even though you're only using those two texts. Also, you could check if you're supposed to do it according to MLA or any other system, just to be sure. Even if you don't need it for this essay it'll probably be useful in the future.
In high school English classes in the United States, a works cited page is usually omitted because the entire class including the teacher has the same copy of the book. A works cited is more important for research papers where you are using multiple sources that may be unfamiliar to the reader (the teacher).
If your teacher didn't ask for one, don't add it.