Just a question: haven't any of you LOTR haters had to read books like the Odyssey and the Scarlett Letter in school? I'm wondering because the way you talk about how terribly boring the LOTR is, it would make me think you have never had a proper english class.
LOL!
I personally just prefer HP to LOtR in terms of reading for pleasure, but I respect Tolkien as a writer and as a Christian. And yes, I've read the Odyssey, along with the Iliad and the Aeneid and some Rousseau and some Edmund Burke and Livy and Herodotus and Dante, etc. etc. I respect Tolkien; I respect his work and when I read the trilogy and the Hobbit last year, it was actually a fairly nice break from our primary readings.
I just prefer JKR's writing style. It's fun and while it's certainly easy to read I love how she plays with names and locations and always has great subplots that never get too confusing. Tolkien is just too tedious at times.
Yes, HP is easier to read. And gives you more instant pleasure (almost every page is enjoyable). But LOTR contains comments on humanity which go far deeper than any HP book. JRR Tolkein was in WWI. After coming back he was so traumatized that he released the stress by writing a book: the LOTR. And it shows. You can see the WWI influences in this book.
Really now? I thought that part of the story was an anti-masonic message. i.e. "the evil in the east" and "the all-seeing eye", etc.
Gender:
Points: 17580
Reviews: 798