This probably explains why his novel didn't do so well

5 posts
User avatar
Gender Male
Points 11542
Reviews 426
rl-stine-writing-tips.jpg
rl-stine-writing-tips.jpg (56.27 KiB) Viewed 378 times




User avatar
Gender None specified
Points 8890
Reviews 191
Stephen King would disagree with #1, preferring to let his characters write the story rather than himself.

Totally agree with #2 though, always start from the end.
_




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 652
Reviews 178
Too much formula! His little plan leaves no room for creativity. That explains why all of his children's books are the same.
Review unto others as you would have others review unto you.

Don't panic!

Also, Shino!




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 39955
Reviews 1288
I have to wonder how many great books would never exist if everyone followed #1. #2 probably makes sense, but #3 was weird and puts too many limits on the words you got in your story. #4 is really restricting and makes you see how very important adverbs can be. And with #5, this is writing, not football. :P

ETA: "Never" and "always" are adverbs. Mr. Stine should have removed them.
"You do ill if you praise, but worse if you censure, what you do not understand." Leonardo Da Vinci

<YWS><R1>




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 53415
Reviews 1125
I always enjoyed Erin Morgenstern's confession: "I love adverbs. I love adverbs so much I want to get 'ly' tattooed behind my ear."

But dear goodness. No "was", "got" or "put"? How... how...?

So remove the verb "to be" from your vocabulary.

"Where exists Nate?"

"Oh, he stands over there."

What a horribly awkward thing to do.
"Stella. You were in my dream the other night. And everyone called you Princess." -Lauren2010



Who's the more foolish, the fool, or the fool who follows him?
— Obi-Wan Kenobi