Snow...(flakes)

*CLAP* *CLAP* *CLAP*

Incandescence wrote:Bjorn,


This belongs in your blog, not on the poetry forum.

You have produced and are capable of producing much better.


Best,
Brad

*slams mouse on the table*
Argh... BRAD YOU ARE SOOOOOOOOOOOO HORRIBLE SOMETIMES.
i can't bear it.
This poem was amazing.... although rainment isn't a word.... but come on!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please don't take what he says to heart... its too good to be for a blog.
lexy xxxx

Uh... lexy?

That really wasn't that necessary. If you don't agree with someone that's fine, but it's no reason to tell them that they're a horrible person and should be ignored. o.O

lexy >> Although I hesitate to say "flaming", this is not the place to complain about Brad. If you have a problem with a member, contact a moderator or administrator THROUGH PM, not in a topic. Not th placce to do it.

hmm what should i say... evryone seems to have used my favourite Bjorn-poem-comment-line (short and sweet) so i'll say it in Bengali ---- "Chhotto, shundor, mishti kobita" whicgh means (oder of words are same in meaning "small, beautiful, sweet poem"

meow-you're sending in a lot of poems-cool!

My, when did this resurface?! Hahaha Please, please, don't get worked up about what Brad said. Where would we be without him? I admire his bluntness Now I think of it, this poem does sound like a rambling. However, Brad, I thank you for commenting on the fact I could and have done better, I'm actually nervous of posting poems because of you! (understandably so; and not in a bad way!)

Again thank-you all , and Sohini for spicing up the "short and sweet" comment

Umm...can I repeat everyone else?

Short and sweet and cute and simple. I like!

Wiggy

Thank-you!

I agree that is it Short, Simple, and Sweet...in whatever order you want to put that in.

But there is also nothing that makes you want to read it again. It's just kind of so short and simple that you read it, it does nothing for you, so you forget it.

But in the Short, Sweet, Simple way...it's good =]

Ahaha, yes, which is why I was surprised this re-surfaced.

Thanks anyhow!