The structure of this poem is based off of Wallace Stevens' "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird".
----
I.
I am no sounder than I was yesterday.
I am sounder than I will be tomorrow.
Inside this box
I call home.
II.
I saw silhouettes
Like boxes
Without labels, and fading.
III.
A man and a women are trapped
Somewhere invisible, but not soundproof.
Out of their box
Leaks sad noise
And happy evil.
IV.
He built a box with his insides.
It blocked the sun.
He continued to refuse the pen
And chose the sword instead.
V.
We didn't know that light could lie.
When we saw the box's contents
They cried
Upon seeing us fallen victims
And we ignored their tears.
VI.
Why must you dwell upon these sufferings?
Give boxes of destruction?
Give them.
Take them.
Leave them.
VII.
I know of my fingers and prints,
My rims and circles, swirls and plunges,
But I also know
Some boxes will not open
Even if your soul fits inside the keyhole.
VIII.
She saved every bit of him
And locked him in a box.
The letter she write was never opened
Nor read
But it swelled
With every wasted thought.
IX.
Our futures are not safe.
Many tried to lock them up
Inside tiny boxes.
All the flyers could not fit, though
They haven’t given up yet.
X.
I am no saner than I was an hour ago.
I am saner that I will be next October
Inside this box
Where all but me is blind.
XI.
When the box tumbled off its pedestal,
No backs bent.
No hearts wept.
XII.
His car was see-through but oh so clean.
When its trunk popped open
His mirrors did not see
The boxes dying
As playthings of lesser vehicles.
XIII.
She is wrapped in regrets
And bandaged with sighs.
No one dares speak of ignorant malice
Petty evils
Or truth
For fear she might hear
Through her wooden box.
Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
I love the poem this is based on, and thought you did a very good job of making your own version using the existing structure. Here are a few points that caught my attention:
The last two lines of part III seem awkward to me. I think it is just the fact that "sad noise" and "happy evil" don't sound especially interesting. I don't understand what this section is about, which is fine--it should be somewhat mysterious or inexplicable, like the original--but I think you should choose more interesting words. I'm sorry I can't really be more helpful, since I don't know what you're trying to get at. "Sad noise" might actually work, but "happy evil" certainly doesn't strike me as a quality description.
There isn't anything particularly wrong with these lines, but I tend to dislike referencing cliches. The first two lines struck me as very visceral and elicited an emotional response, but the "pen v. sword" part made me lose interest. There has to be a more original way to say that.
The last line quoted above just sounds wrong. Maybe that's just in my head, but I would suggest re-wording it. The word "all" seems to imply "[they] all" in which case the verb would be plural, "are," instead of "is."
Now, to highlight my favorite lines:
I don't have much to say about the lines quoted above except that they all struck me as especially intriguing and made me want to read more. Overall, this was a well-written and enjoyable poem. It seems like you had fun with it. Anyone who can write like Wallace Stevens will always impress me
This was good. I really liked it!

I didn't find any spelling or grammer errors, which is always good.
I liked your references to Pandora's box, even though I haven't actually read it. The way you described it was intriguing.
This poem was interesting!
Good work.
- RedRaven
I really like the last one. It reminds me Pandora's Box for some reason, actually several of them do.
Though I think it's a little awkward when you say no saner in ten. I'm not sure what it would reall be, but it doesn't sound right.