Boromir

PreviousNext

[spoiler]I'm mainly concerned with the last paragraph.[/spoiler]
In 1954 a man by the name of J.R.R. Tolkien published a book he titled The Fellowship of the Ring, the first of the trilogy Lord of the Rings. A character that is introduced and dies in this book is a man of the name Boromir. He is the epitome of ‘man’ in Middle Earth. He’s impatient, selfish, and quick to anger.  Boromir is the one of the first characters in the trilogy to fall under the Ring’s enchantment. He attacks the protagonist, Frodo, for it and is painted as a generally unlikable character. However, Boromir, a man who tried to take the Ring for his own purposes, demonstrates humility and honor towards the end of his life. He attempts to save two other Hobbits that accompanied Frodo, sacrificing himself so they might be saved. With his dying breath, he shows great humility by apologizing for attacking Frodo and dies an honorable man.

 

Boromir is the first character in any literature I became aware of that fits into the group I call ‘redeemed characters.’ These characters are creations that begin the story as unlikeable but endear themselves in one way or another at the end of the story or their involvement in the story. Sometimes I call these characters the ‘Boromir character’ because he was the first I was aware of.
 

He also opened my eyes to the fact that goodness is in everyone.  If a man can endanger the world and still protect practically defenseless beings with his own life, could not a man here on Earth, in reality, make a horrendous mistake and redeem himself? I think he could. Whatever the mistake, I think it could be overcome and that legacy replaced with a more favorable one. I try, sometimes unsuccessfully, to give people the benefit of the doubt. Boromir is one of the reasons why.
 

Boromir shown me that actions do not always mirror one’s soul. Sometimes outside factors tarnish the surface, and we need to be understanding enough to either ignore the smudges or learn to accept them. Maybe I should have mentioned that Boromir thought the ring would be the perfect weapon to defeat an army that was coming to destroy his city, to save hundreds of thousands of lives. Sometimes, one’s reasons, reasons we cannot always see, are often better than the outcome they create.
Comments & reviews · 3
Note: You are not logged in, but you can still leave a comment or review. Before it shows up, a moderator will need to approve your comment (this is only a safeguard against spambots). Leave your email if you would like to be notified when your message is approved.

User avatar
Caerulean
Review

Happy Review Day! :)

First of all, I'd like to say that I read this because of the title! :D Yes, *ahem* I am a LOTR fan. Anyway...

You have got some interesting insights there. It seems like Boromir is also the first of the characters I've known who redeemed themselves as far as I can remember. The way he was shown as an completely antagonistic guy in the beginning until the end came was so well done that he probably became the least liked character in 'The Fellowship Of The Ring' movie for many people. But that redeeming ending was very well done as well that all the bad thoughts we had on Boromir were suddenly washed away. Nevertheless, Boromir seemed to have become an underrated character and this post being 'dedicated' to him is interesting. :)

In the 3rd paragraph, you talked about moral lessons coming out from Boromir and I'm not questioning them. :) I think everyone can agree. In the last paragraph, your insight was reflective, and I wonder if other people had thought the same way. Since the Council of Elrond, Boromir's idea of using the One Ring as a weapon against the Enemy was introduced to us, but as the movie progressed, we seemed to have forgotten about this because we got annoyed by the corruption of Boromir, even though the idea was mentioned again when Boromir confronted Frodo.

Sometimes, one’s reasons, reasons we cannot always see, are often better than the outcome they create.

- I don't think I fully agree with this one. For me, reasons and the outcome (cause and effect) are equally important and one does not justify the other. If only one of them is good, the whole equation still needs an amendment/resolution. Take Boromir for example. If the cause of his corruption, which is bad, was his desire to defend his people, which is good, his corruption still needs to be corrected for it to all turn out all right. In the movie, Boromir did by redeeming himself, thus cancelling out the imbalance between cause and effect.

See what I mean? :)

Anyway, I have nothing else to say. :) Just keep the LOTR fandom and never stop writing! :D

P.S.
I wonder why your spoiler did not work. o.o

User avatar
Shady
Review
Shady wrote a review · Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:08 am

Hey Egs!

Here with your review, as requested. :D

Boromir has shown me that actions
~Typo, 'has shown', not 'shown'.

I'm not sure I like the 'Maybe I should have mentioned'...that sounds too...I'm not sure what, but I don't really like that bit. Maybe "Boromir thougth The Ring would be the perfect weapon to deat an army that was coming to destroy his city, to save hundreds of thousands of lives-- but no one asked why he wanted it." Or...I'm not really sure what to suggest. Maybe something along those lines, though...

Boromir thought The Ring
~ O.o What?! 'the ring'? It's THE Ring. It deserves capitalization... xD

~~~

Overall it's a good, strong piece. A-bound. :D

~Shady

User avatar
megsug
Comment

:P The spoiler didn't work. Sorry.



The strongest people are not those who show their true strength in front of us but those who win battles we know nothing about.
— Unknown