Published November 19, 2010
...
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hello, I've come to give you my review. I hope it can be of some help!
First off, I'm not so sure about the title. I used to love to have one word titles because I thought it was more profound or something, but it is risky. There were two things I thought of when I first read the title: the TV show "Wings" and the band of the same name. That's not exactly the impression you want to give right off the bat, so I suggest you add something more so it separates itself. Just a suggestion.
Semicolon as there are two independent clauses. When you are attempting to indicate rushing or going quickly, your sentences should be as least weighed-down as possible. I think "of the hospital" weighs it down more than the way I've changed it.
I struckout that part in the second paragraph because I think we can gather what you mean by the second sentence of that paragraph.
This is lovely. I have one complaint and that is Rachel takes the stairs. It would be great to see her take the elevator with the man! It would really be a great opportunity to characterize her. What I really, really suggest you do is take that whole part about people hating sickness and apply it to Rachel instead of people in general. I think that would really make her a more round character (as opposed to flat). It may make us disprove of her a little bit more, but who could blame her?! And besides, it will show how much more she is willing to go through to see this patient.
You should probably make sure we know Pete is a kid right off the bat here (he is a kid right?).
I think it would much more powerful for Rachel to say nothing there. Let us breathe in the despair of the hospital setting a little bit.
No need to get into Rachel's head right here. If Pete has this long of a story and Rachel hasn't interrupted already, then we know she is resisting that possible urge. Especially when she says her next line, which I love by the way. I really suggest omitting the line I struckout in my previous comment because then that would be two times Rachel completely avoids Pete thinking about her in such a way, which I really think she would want to avoid.
A small suggestion. Slow it down here. After he answers that he doesn't want food, bring in something that reminds Rachel she's in a hospital. Perhaps another patient or an intercom. I think going slow here will really dramatize the scene.
It took me way too long to figure out they were shoes. We should know this from the start. It doesn't do anything to withhold that information but confuse the reader. It's just as powerful to know that they are shoes two or three paragraphs earlier. In that case, I would suggest Rachel interrupt him with another line, seeing as the one you have now seems to have the purpose of introducing the fact that they are shoes.
That response from Rachel is boring and doesn't say anything about her. I see she wants to move on to another topic, so I think it would be best for her deflect the dream in a different way than just to call the dream interesting.
Also, there is really one glaring thing here. By this point, we realize that Rachel was somehow involved in Pete's accident. If his mother, who would be an authority with the hospital figures over who gets to visit her child, didn't want Rachel to visit Pete, it simply wouldn't happen. There is no way any hospital would allow that. You'll have to find some way around that.
I do really like this ending, and if you take my advice earlier on about her avoiding the wings twice, then this becomes even more powerful that she now wants to know about it.
Nice work! I enjoyed most of Pete's blathering, which I felt made him a stronger character. The talk about Rachel's grandmother is okay, but I think if you put in some more ideas of how much she hates hospitals, then it will make the whole scene more potent. Feel free to ask me any other questions!
Hi! I'm back. This may just be because you just did a lot of editing and rewriting, but there were a few awkward phrases and strange punctuation issues and such. I'm not going to dwell on them because I think those are the kind of thing you can fix on your own (though I do suggest you look into the rules for punctuating dialogue), but I would like to call a few things to your attention:
This reads a bit awkwardly, in my opinion.It just feels like there's too much information for one sentence. I would split it up, if I were you, making something-like-but-not-necessarily: "The woman scowls and begins to open her mouth to say something, but their eyes meet, and for a second she sees the anxiety in Rachel’s expression. She shuts her mouth and passes without saying a word."Hm... I think if you use the word "would" in a sentence like this, you also need an "if" part of the sentence as well (like "Rachel knows he would have been like this all day if it was up to him."). On the other hand, you could always just say something like "Rachel knows he has been like this all day."
This is a pet-peeve of mine: in general, try not to write the character names unless you have to. It breaks up the flow (for me, anyway). In this case, there are only two characters present -- and one is male and one is female! So if you just call them "he" and "she" you'll be fine.
and then, later: I'm not complaining about this -- on the contrary, I like it a lot! It's a nice parallel between the characters.
------------------------
I liked the overall structure of this version much better than the last. The introduction of Rachel walking into the hospital really set a great mood for the whole piece. It gives me the feeling that Rachel really hates being there (who wouldn't?!) which lets the reader know that whatever reason she has for coming must be a really good one. And it also made the scene with Pete feel like more of a climax, since it had that whole part leading up to it. I'm a little disappointed that it isn't completely dialogue anymore, but I'll live.
I'm still a little frustrated with the Rachel character, and her decision. Now that the whole piece isn't just dialogue and the narrative spends some time in her head, it feels weird to me that we learn about her whole conflict when she says it. I'm not saying that you have to explicitly say what she is thinking about visiting Pete, but I think there should be a bit more foreshadowing. For example, when she is entering the hospital you could say something about how many times she had been there lately and how she felt guilty about coming, and wanted to force herself not to come back.
Also, I like the idea of the Grandma, and I absolutely think you should keep it, but it's also a little misleading. You mention that she thinks about that, but not so much about Pete -- which makes it seem like when she is visiting Pete she is thinking more about her grandmother than she is about the kid she's visiting. (That was a terribly-worded sentence, but hopefully you know what I mean). Why don't I give an example? Okay, after she asks him if he remembers the accident, and he replies “Um…no, I just remember you carrying me.” then they lapse into silence. Because of the context, I was expecting her flashback to have something to do with the accident. But it didn't. It was about Grandma. I understand that you want to be vague about the accident, but I think in order to pull that off you will need to have a little bit more information about it. Show us (through her thoughts) how Rachel feels about the accident, rather than just telling it to us in her speech.
In summary, my problem with the piece is this: you've moved a lot of the story into Rachel's head, and added flashbacks and such, all in an effort to make the piece feel more story-like and less scene-like (or that's my take on it, anyway), but it's still just as vague as it was in the other (all-dialogue) version. Basically, if we're going to be inside your character's head, listening to her thoughts, it feels weird not to know about the main point of her visit. I obviously don't know the exact reasoning you had behind changing the format, but I assume it's to give the readers a better understanding of Rachel's character. And you've done that. But I still feel like there's part of her missing, and it just happens to be the part that's most central to the story.
Anyway, it's rather late so I'm not sure if I'm making sense, but I hope I am! I am still firmly of the opinion that this piece has a lot of potential (and I still love Pete!) but I also still think it has a little ways to go.
I hope that helped! Please PM me or post on my wall if I was unclear about anything or if you want to argue with me or if you want me to look at another version. :)
a