Hey again cherylkate. I would like to first point out that I did also read the first part when I was doing the critique so that I knew what I was talking about. However, thank you for your response and explanations. It actually gives me more to work with.
Emily has never been normal, and never lived a normal life. She's sort of got a screw missing.
So why haven't you shown us this? What evidence is there that her life isn't "normal"? In fact, what is considered to be a "normal" life? I'm assuming by that, you mean a lack of friendships and parental support? Talk more about how the narrator's relationship with her parents and the interactions (or lack of interaction) she has with her peers. Make it convincing to us that she's troubled.
She's fallen head over heels in love with David, who is essentially perfect (in her opinion), but has now been told that David is a figment of her imagination - never existed, never will. A part of her is struggling to rationally accept that, while another is trying desperately to cling to what she had, even if it isn't "real".
You still haven't fully convinced me here. I get it that the narrator has fallen head over heels with David because he's the first person that actually cares about him, but what does he do to swing the narrator that way? Give more details here.
You might want to show more of the conflict that the narrator faces in terms of whether to keep or ditch David (her figment). Consider the following factors:
-Social
-Family
-Work
-Economical
-Academic
E.g: What does her family think of her having these dreams? There are many possible factors that could influence the narrator to want to get rid of David. Just simply saying that the narrator wants to come back to grips with reality isn't enough. There has to be some conflicts that she wants resolved in wanting to come to grips with reality. Right now, you haven't shown us that. Seriously, not sleeping just to avoid David? If I was in the narrator's shoes, I would much rather be sleeping just to get laid since there doesn't seem to be any consequences if the narrator does sleep. Hence, you have to show those consequences.
Considering that this is written in first person, I'm rather disappointed. With first person, you are given more flexibility around the "show don't tell rule" and a greater number of opportunities to explore how the narrator is thinking or feeling. Yet, you are not willing to take advantage of this? Why make the reader guess?
In fact, what's the point of writing something only to make the reader assume aspects of your narrative? Heck, why don't we just all write out only one sentence for our novels and leave the reader to guess the rest? Why would published authors spend so much time, effort and words when we can simply assume what's going to happen. As an author, you should be helping the audience to search for meanings in life through your works, not to make them assume and leave them in the dark.
Even in those "unspoken" stories, there has to be some groundwork laid or else what's the point of even reading them?
I really do think you have a very interesting concept here, but you must, must explain and elaborate. I cannot stress this fact further. As you are dealing with a concept that many are unfamiliar with, explanation is vital in determining the success of this piece. If this piece was more down to earth, say based on teenage relationships, then you wouldn't need to explain everything. But with this, you must.
Good luck.
Andy.
P.S:
Also, in my opinion, it's not a superficial idea that it's focusing on, though that does come into play. Yes, she is attracted by the perfect physical specimen (because, who isn't?) and yes, she's disparaging of how average Matt is, but that doesn't mean that she's superficial.
I'm not saying the narrator is superficial (read my words more carefully). I'm saying that your ideas are superficial at the moment because you've talked more about the physical attraction aspect of a relationship of this nature rather than viewing the premise from a wider perspective. Hence, you need to justify and explain.
Points: 5577
Reviews: 672
Donate