Published March 4, 2008
-undergoing major reconstruction, check back later-
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
I will definitely review it when you post it again!
Sorry. >.>
~Azila~
-awaits expectantly-
thanks for the comments everyone! i think im going to scratch this and start over, with a more dino feel. thanks again!
My word to describe this piece was interesting. Maybe it's just me, but I thought it got kind of boring throughout. But then again I'm not a big dinosaur person, so that may be it.
I give you point for creativity, though. I liked how they communicated by clicks and sounds. That was neat.
Moving on to your use of the english language...
“Sickly Gallimimus 10 o’clock,”
I don't think that in this particular time era that clocks had even been invented. And would dinosuars even know which direction ten o'clock is?
“Yeah,” I admitted reluctantly.
This is way too modern of a word to use. "Yes," would be better. I noticed that you used "yeah" a few times. Might want to go back and revise that.
I didn't really notice anything else. It bothered me when you used C'mon and headin', etc. Donisuars existed a LONG time ago, and our slang weren't even thought up yet. How would they know to use it? For this type of story I would use whole worgs, like "going" instead of "heading".
There were a few other phrases but I can't remember and I don't have time to go back.
On a more postive note, I really did, in general, like it. It wasn't bad.
Keep writing.
You requested, so here I am!
The first sentence is kind of adjective-heavy. Meaning that you say it's a THICK wall of SPRINGY ferns and BROAD-LEAFED plants and INTENSE eyes, and that's kind of purple. You would benefit from combing through this phrase and deciding which adjectives are necessary for the mental image.
Also, the second sentence is kind of iffy. The semicolon should be a comma, unless you change it to: They were mine; they were hungry.
Comma after 'backwards'.
Comma after 'low'.
There's something kinda weird about this sentence. Maybe you should change it to: I lowered my head to the ground, my ams trailing in the grass, blades tickling my nostrils as I placed my hind legs carefully, not wanting to startle the herd.
It's kind of a matter of opinion, but I think a comma after 'shrieked' would help the flow.
You can avoid a passive voice here and attain a more active one by showing that your pack is relieved instead of telling. Even something as simple as 'my pack breathed a sigh of relief' would be better.
Comma after 'back'.
I think there should be an 'at' after 'Gallimimus'... either that or a comma.
Firstly, the comma after 'proud' should be a semicolon. And secondly, there's something off-putting about the bit in brackets Maybe you should find a less tell-y way of putting it, and I think you should avoid the brackets all together.
Comma after 'mate' and 'pare' should be 'pair'.
Comma after 'Besides', methinks.
Replace the comma after 'uncertainly' with either a semicolon or a period.
I thought carnivores weren't very affectionate?
“Yeah,” I admitted reluctantly, “Besides, its nearly dark-time and we have to be back with the pack.”
[/quote]
'its' should be: it's.
Maybe 'Rhishtia' should be in italics, since it's a foreign word?
There's something awkward about that sentence... maybe reword it a little?
Comma after 'troop'.
Comma after 'eerie'.
You refer to their claws as 'killing claws' quite a bit. Repeated descriptions are tedious to read, so you might want to get rid of 'killing'.
'arch like' should be hyphenated.
I don't think 'rockslide' is a word. Maybe hyphenate it, or make it two separate words?
This sounds kind of choppy. You might be able to fix that by explaining the use of these caves.
Comma after 'mate'.
I think the comma should be a semicolon, or you should put an 'and' after 'usual'.
Comma after 'secluded'.
'sunk' shoudl be 'sank'? I'm not sure...
Maybe you should say 'their usual spots' to indicate that that's where they usually rest.
I thought carnivores weren't affectionate except as mates?
Comma after 'memory' = semicolon, or: I snorted at the memory -- Zya was small and energetic, with a slim body and a smooth head.
It seems kind of obvious here that you're trying to fill us in about the characters. But, as it is, it's kind of info-dumpy and not very interesting to read. You might want to shorten these paragraphs and spread out this information during the story. For example, show the reader that Loki is nervous but dependable on a hunt in a hunting scene, don't just tell us now.
Comma after 'sleek'.
I think it should be: A perfectly formed hunting machine -- those were rare.
Comma = semicolon, methinks.
Comma after 'annoying'.
Comma = semicolon.
Ack! Don't use multiple exclamation points in fiction.
Apostrophe after the N in 'headin': headin'.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall, this is good. It's interesting and your characterization is pretty good, although the dinosaurs seem almost too colloquial. As in, all those slang terms and casual dialogue don't seem very dinosaur-ish.
I think you can make your imagery more powerful by using all five senses when describing things. For example, in the beginning, describe the heat of the sun on their scales, the scents flooding their nostrils. You savvy?
Also, I'm no dino expert, but according to my spell-check, half the herbivores' names don't exist. Did you invent them, or what?
On the topic of dinosaurs, I think you should do some research. So far, there isn't anything really weird, but you might want to look into where the dinosaurs lived and whatnot. Even though it's fantasy, it's good to have some cold hard facts.
Yes. This is promising; I'll be looking out for the next bit. PM me when it's posted!
Cheers,
Camille xx
Hi there, Cat!
Well I'm going to try to be as critical as possible because I guess that's the point.
before I do big bad wolf, I'd like to point out that t-Rex's don't hunt in packs and would therefore have been ill suited to the story.
p.s I am intrigued by Norse mythology too!
Well I think your story was generally very well described, you made a few minute spelling mistakes but nothing major.
While it is incredibly easy to read and get into I suggest you have a look over it for those little bits that snag which seem all the more obvious when you're this good!
The story was fluid, very lifelike and it held my imagination.
I have to say i have never seen anything like it other than -shudder-
'the land before time' but that takes a whole different approach!
As for the speech I'll admit it seemed awkward but I can see this being a modern day jungle book.
The animals don't have to talk all mighty and exquisitely for you to get the picture, you can do this with as it was put 'teens speak'
and esp~ if you are aiming for a teen audience.
(if not I'd suggest changing only that!)
I think this is excellent at your age!
Most have difficult with the structure never mind the story!
KEEP IT UP!
Hey! This was a good start! But still... raptors? C'mon! T-Rex's are soooooo much cooler!
Anyway, my personal life to the side:
It was very intriguing. I like the whole 'dinosaur' thing that you have going on. *high fives* And I like it because it's about carnivorous. Herbivores are really stupid, I think. No teeth to fight with... yeah. Stop blabbering!
One thing that made me go, "Ugh" inside is your talking. I'm not quite sure about it. You make it seem as if they are human teenagers. They're not. They're dinosaurs. But dinos' don't talk. Gah. I'm making no sense.
It's just that the dialogue really bummed me out. But it adds loads of personality. So, I'm kinda so-so with it.
You had a HUGE info dump, and you know it. But, still, it kinda worked out. You didn't overload us with very much information. Just enough to get us informed.
Well done, Cat! I'll be looking for more!
-Jared