I told you before to be ready for my review.
First thing: figure out why you write. Would you like to pontificate? Would you like to describe? Would you like to show? Are you seeking personal fame? What exactly is it?
Prose is a delicate process of painting, illustrating, designing, embellishing, flourishing, and placing all things in perspective as you like; but, you aren't infallible. The narrator of any piece of prose, rather the narrative process, must make amends for readers as much as they must pay attention to the writer's original purpose.
You've got a first person narrator, "I" to this "you" as the dearest, which is by all means unreliable and otherwise dictating a letter to some...metaphysical entity. I'll be blunt, I don't care what the narrator was talking to and since you have an unreliable narrator that's really bad. By the end I was happy it was over. The purpose of this piece seemed as existent as the world to the narrator. A tinge of Gothic Romanticism attempting to play in Modernity while not creating a world I can fit myself into beyond the Narrator's egotistical, frenzied talk. Your narrator, manic and bothered and perhaps interesting in that respect, shows a very limited world in all respects beyond their own fascination with few views of the world they inhabit: if you must show the narrator in the writing as the world in which they are, you must make clear that the world is either alienating or alienated from the narrator without painstaking, confusing description.
I see Poe in this, amongst other Romantic writers. I would highly advise you check The Telltale Heart, The Black Cat, etc. Granted, this seems to draw from a different culture, but the effect of tone and personality and the usage of the narrative perspective would be tantamount for you to examine.
Some examples of amateur mistakes:
Dearest,
Three people burned to their deaths today, and no-one even asked any questions.
Several things to think about immediately: diction, phrasing, flow. The signified subject of the beginning implies a deep connection to the designee of the letter/note/etc. This effectively shapes all of your story. Your title? Stains of Red, and...we have a connection of morbidity and a fascination between a relationship of some sort and a dispersion of the color red; then people are dead. We are being given shock and awe in a style that exposes little for the purpose of suspense. This would work if not for a few reasons:
1. "Burned to their deaths"
2. "and no-one"
3. "even asked any"
^These all read either archaically or painfully. Why are you using past tense? Why are you further using plural specific when you mentioned these three people? What's more, your elaboration, as if shock, in the second part of the sentence is a falling point for your aghast surprise: it would be much more interesting if the narrator simply stated "no one asked any questions". This is ironic, this is odd, this is jarring whereas "even" is expected surprise, expected trauma, expected chaos. If you must have a story where the narrator is seemingly mad or a murderer, MESS WITH OUR PERCEPTIONS in the subtle unspoken words. That's the difficulty of prose: being able to rant on description and then knowing when to cut out unnecessary words, details, and passages.
As is, you're providing too much of your narrator's persona without creating a world to exhibit through the narrator. Thus, we have a conflict of interests. At times I felt the paragraphs were separate points altogether, loosely combined and connected by the only common element: "I". The main way this occurred to me came from turning my head from the screen: when I looked back I could not find my place without severe difficulty. Nothing connected, nothing found its way back to itself. What's more, by the end I was annoyed at the title since you're trying too hard to be subtle, too hard to be suspenseful when I know what's coming all along, but in the process I have to sift through so much...I wonder when the loops in the road will straighten out and get to the point.
The best comparison I can give you to look at in prose is this story here. Look at the difference. Does this make sense?
Feel free to contact me privately for further points and clarifications.
Points: 7386
Reviews: 159
Donate