Compartmentalizing

by Starve

Published June 8, 2020

E - Everyone

Compartmentalizing


We belittle the area a thought controls,
when it holds a bit less, weighs a bit more.
Because it’s easier to be parting wholes

that become too big to fit in loopholes.
Turn the lights off on it, have a loud snore,
we belittle the dream a thought controls.

It hurts your mind-lions reduced to foals—
caged up to be displayed at the fore.
Because it’s easier to be a part in wholes,

in the collected shrieks of corrected souls.
Stepping in to clean those cages is a chore,
we belittle the life a thought controls.

Picking half wins to giving up some goals,
fearing the schism waiting behind the door,
because it’s easier to be parting holes.

Putting the cages on display like a store,
sentences parted unnaturally before
we belittle the area a thought controls,
‘cause it’s easier to be apart in wholes.

Comments & reviews · 4
User avatar
alliyah
Comment
alliyah commented Comment · Aug 1, 2020

Hey Traves! I have to agree with liminality that the wordplay in this is quite entertaining and makes for a poem that not only has great sound, but also makes you think! My favorite phrase has to be your repeated chorus of "parting holes" / "apart in wholes" even just the concept of being "apart" while "whole/unwhole" feels a bit meta to think about, but I enjoyed the read.

Sound was right on point too!

Starve replied · Aug 2, 2020

Thanks a lot for the compliment, alliyah !

User avatar
Liminality
Review
Liminality wrote a review Review · Jun 25, 2020

Hi there! I thought this was a clever poem about compartmentalising feelings (or thoughts? in this case). It has this cold, logical tone that seems to portray compartmentalisation as disturbing. Simultaneously, I feel the speaker comes across as resigned to it somewhat, especially with the phrasing "it's easier".

1. The reason I say it's a 'clever' poem is probably how neatly the structure and wordplay fits into the theme. I liked the evolution of the repeated refrain from "to be parting wholes" to "to be apart in wholes". This sort of wordplay makes the process of compartmentalisation seem more insidious, subtle, almost unnoticed, as that's what is reflected in the language. This also applies to the enjambment effect between stanzas. At first, I was concerned it would disrupt the flow of the poem, but after reading it out loud, I was convinced. It really does give a sense of disassociation, which again conveys a slightly disturbing portrayal of compartmentalisation.

2. One thing that tripped my tongue up a little while reading it was the formality v.s. informality of words. I'm not sure if it's intentional, but somehow to me having more formal, high-handed words like "belittle" and "fore" said by the same speaker as "have a loud snore" reads a little bit abruptly. It's just a minor thing about word choices.

3. However, the imagery in general worked well. I liked how each image is centered around the idea of hiding or repressing, from turning out the lights to cages to 'behind the door'. My only concern was this bit: ". . . mind-lions reduced to foals". Does that mean "mind-lions" as in one image? Or was it supposed to be "It hurts your mind" em dash "lions reduced to foals"? Maybe clarifying that with the punctuation could help?

4. I loved the sound effects in this piece! There's a lot of harsh consonants - fitting with the theme. My favourite phrase was "collected shrieks of corrected souls". The repeated 'c' and 's' sounds help emphasise the parallels, yet contrast also the intense "shrieks" with deceptively calm "souls". I also like a few particular rhymed pairs here, such as "controls//wholes" and "store// before". They come across as unexpected, but natural, and sound great read aloud.

This piece is structurally and conceptually great. I just think it could use a wee bit of tweaking on the word choices, as I said, and that's the only thing. I like how cryptic and thought-provoking it is, and it's really interesting to think about how we deal with thoughts in this day and age. Hopefully you find some of these comments helpful.

Cheers!
-Liminality

Starve replied · Jun 25, 2020

Thanks for the review Liminality! The "mind-lions" is hyphenated, dashes are longer ( which I produce on keyboard using alt 0151 , works most of the time). I do agree that hyphens and dashes are confused often. As for the word choices, I hadn't thought of them this way. I guess it's a byproduct of being constrained by a rhyme scheme plus being ESL, where I don't always get to the level of native speakers while not explicitly trying to remember what is and isn't informal. This was useful though, since that is not an acceptable reason while writing where I have a lot of time to re-phrase the words. Thanks for pointing it out!

Ah, I see. That makes sense. And on that note, I do like the idea of 'mind-lions' - it's a really original image :) Glad you found it useful, but yeah, finding the right words in a structured poem is t o u g h

User avatar
LittleLee
Comment
LittleLee commented Comment · Jun 18, 2020

Hey, nice poem!

Starve replied · Jun 18, 2020

Thank you LittleLee !

Starve replied · Jun 18, 2020

Thank you LittleLee !

User avatar
Em16
Review
Em16 wrote a review Review · Jun 8, 2020

Nice job writing a villanelle! I know how difficult those can be. You had some really good descriptions and comparisons, like where you say “putting the cages on display like a store”. That’s a vivid comparison with a lot of meaning behind it. I also like the line “in the collected shrieks of corrected souls”. There’s good alliteration there, and it has a lot of meaning. Personally, I interpreted it as the pain of people society has forced into being someone they’re not.
However, while there were a bunch of good lines in this poem, overall I didn’t really understand what you were trying to say. I have no clear idea of the theme or overall message. Are you talking about thoughts? It would seem so, but I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say about thoughts. For example, the line “we belittle the area a thought controls”. I don’t really get that. Are you saying, as a society, we “belittle” thoughts? Why did you mention “the area”? There are a lot of good lines with meaning in them, but I don’t really see the connection between them. How does “picking half wins to giving up some goals” relate to the “schism waiting behind the door”? I would suggest trying to make the theme of the poem clearer.

Starve replied · Jun 9, 2020

Thanks for the review @Em16
So this poem is about the various aspects and cause/effects of the psychological phenomenon of compartmentalization where you stick usually inconsistent things in separate thought-structures, separated so that you can have some peace or move on. Here's an article about it
https://www.avalonmalibu.com/blog/cogni ... alization/

So I'm talking both about "thoughts" as in ideas as well as meta-thoughts -> thoughts about thoughts. Now, you might put thoughts which should actually be a big part of your general process in a "cage" when you compartmentalize it, and if it fails (which often is the case %u2014 things heavy on the mind bleed into others), then you'd be belittling the area a thought controls. I realize that this should be clear enough from the poem and I should not have to explain it.

I do agree with it being all over the place as it is a really rough first draft that I just wanted to put out there to get some initial criticism and put out the next draft.

Em16 replied · Jun 9, 2020

That's interesting. I had no idea what compartmentalization is. Your poem makes a lot more sense now that I realize that.



I lingered round them, under that benign sky: watched the moths fluttering among the heath and harebells, listened to the soft wind breathing through the grass, and wondered how any one could ever imagine unquiet slumbers for the sleepers in that quiet earth.
— Emily Bronte, Wuthering Heights