z

Young Writers Society



At Rainbow's End...

by Schemilix


If you follow the rainbow across the world,
Over mountains and under seas,
If you follow the ribbon through the changing skies
You'll reach the end, they say.

They're right in that - so physics says,
But in something else they're wrong:
There are no leprechauns to trip on,
(except the bartender)
No gold to run through greedy fingers.
There's something else instead.

A pub.

There's a pub at the end of the rainbow.

It serves beer milked from clouds (they giggle a bit) and
peanuts picked from cirrus trees.
They have been handled
by people who have handled other things
and now have grimy hands.
But people eat them anyway
because they're a little too drunk to care -
And pretend to forget if they're not.

The pub at the end of the rainbow was never given a name,
Because Rainbow's End sells buttons in Swanage
and trinkets, made of world, not sky,
And there're no angels with a taste for a good shandy,
And no Fosters from the end of the world.

So follow the rainbow,
Over mountain high and hill not-so-high,
Cross a few rivers and a couple of errant deserts,
Hold your breath,
Hop twice, spin in a circle with a rowan rod -

and bring your wallet.


Note: You are not logged in, but you can still leave a comment or review. Before it shows up, a moderator will need to approve your comment (this is only a safeguard against spambots). Leave your email if you would like to be notified when your message is approved.







Is this a review?


  

Comments



User avatar
35 Reviews


Points: 890
Reviews: 35

Donate
Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:03 pm
Schemilix says...



Flower~Child wrote:
Schemilix wrote:I'm going to just point out that flow is not a necessity of poetry and thus ignore that statement since it;s clearly a difference of taste. Not all of my poems have a set rythm, it's restricting.

I understand that the humour can be lost on someone (you're the first but you won't be the last, I'm not a satirist by nature and don't pretend to be fantastic at it) but there's no need to be rude about it, particularly because open poetry may or may not have flow.

You act like me writing a poem that isn't funny is some kind of personal offence to you - it's a bit rude.

As I mentioned, I respect that you don't like the poem, however, my issue is with your rather tactles smanner in delivering such dislike when I did little deserve it. Now I have been spoken to and I understand that this wasn't your intention and therefore, I apologise if I seemed perhaps rude in response, however it may be a trigger to be a little more careful with your words in case this happens.

Regards, and thanks for reading it anyway,
Schemilix.


I am not trying to be rude or anything like that, it is oppinion, but this just isnt greatly funny like it is supposed to be. Also no not every poem has flow, but some I think just need it a little better than others.


Oh alright. Well, sorry.

But, it wasn't supposed to be 'greatly funny'. It was supposed to tickle people with a humour similar to mine, but not everyone has the same sense of humour, that I understand just... Your... wording came off as a little... harsh. Yes?

As for the flow... Opinion. You keep yours, I keep mine. I CAN write poems with rythm and flow, but I did not make that decision here.

i guess my issue was that you sort of worded it a bit... harshly and then didn't do anything to make it seem like you weren;t just attacking me. (:




User avatar
321 Reviews


Points: 12611
Reviews: 321

Donate
Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:34 pm
Flower~Child wrote a review...



Schemilix wrote:I'm going to just point out that flow is not a necessity of poetry and thus ignore that statement since it;s clearly a difference of taste. Not all of my poems have a set rythm, it's restricting.

I understand that the humour can be lost on someone (you're the first but you won't be the last, I'm not a satirist by nature and don't pretend to be fantastic at it) but there's no need to be rude about it, particularly because open poetry may or may not have flow.

You act like me writing a poem that isn't funny is some kind of personal offence to you - it's a bit rude.

As I mentioned, I respect that you don't like the poem, however, my issue is with your rather tactles smanner in delivering such dislike when I did little deserve it. Now I have been spoken to and I understand that this wasn't your intention and therefore, I apologise if I seemed perhaps rude in response, however it may be a trigger to be a little more careful with your words in case this happens.

Regards, and thanks for reading it anyway,
Schemilix.


I am not trying to be rude or anything like that, it is oppinion, but this just isnt greatly funny like it is supposed to be. Also no not every poem has flow, but some I think just need it a little better than others.




Random avatar

Points: 2608
Reviews: 37

Donate
Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:58 pm
Helpful McHelpfulpants wrote a review...



As a poem, it's not a bad poem; there are some surprisingly nice turns of phrase, and hints of deeper meanings, la dee da, perhaps not intentional but then reading is a democracy. As pure humor, I think it may fall short because you give us too little reason to see the idea of a pub at the end of the rainbow as ludicrous. It's a funny idea, and you drop that and ladle on descriptions that are pretty and a little wistful rather than funny, as if the mere incongruity of the initial concept should be able to carry the reader through in a state of amusement, which it isn't. That said, lack of humor isn't necessarily a bad thing, because this, unlike most less than droll satires, looks like it could stand without it; might not fully right now, but there's definitely the potential to if you explore other directions -- the bitterness and the sheer disappointment of all that mundanity. Alternatively, you could pull it back to being a funny by... uh. Actually, I have no idea. *uselessface* Sorry, I'm better at humor in prose; in poetry the rhythms that aid such attempts are hard for me to work out.

Good luck! And apologies again for a not very helpful review. Aha. Ahahaha.




User avatar
35 Reviews


Points: 890
Reviews: 35

Donate
Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:21 am
Schemilix says...



I'm going to just point out that flow is not a necessity of poetry and thus ignore that statement since it;s clearly a difference of taste. Not all of my poems have a set rythm, it's restricting.

I understand that the humour can be lost on someone (you're the first but you won't be the last, I'm not a satirist by nature and don't pretend to be fantastic at it) but there's no need to be rude about it, particularly because open poetry may or may not have flow.

You act like me writing a poem that isn't funny is some kind of personal offence to you - it's a bit rude.

As I mentioned, I respect that you don't like the poem, however, my issue is with your rather tactles smanner in delivering such dislike when I did little deserve it. Now I have been spoken to and I understand that this wasn't your intention and therefore, I apologise if I seemed perhaps rude in response, however it may be a trigger to be a little more careful with your words in case this happens.

Regards, and thanks for reading it anyway,
Schemilix.




User avatar
321 Reviews


Points: 12611
Reviews: 321

Donate
Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:07 pm
Flower~Child says...



This is supposed to be funny?? Anyway I don't think this flows very well at all.

I think if you gave it flow, and something a little more funny it would be ok.

Keep Writing

-Flower-





A true poet does not bother to be poetical. Nor does a nursery gardener scent his roses.
— Jean Cocteau