Flower~Child wrote:Schemilix wrote:I'm going to just point out that flow is not a necessity of poetry and thus ignore that statement since it;s clearly a difference of taste. Not all of my poems have a set rythm, it's restricting.
I understand that the humour can be lost on someone (you're the first but you won't be the last, I'm not a satirist by nature and don't pretend to be fantastic at it) but there's no need to be rude about it, particularly because open poetry may or may not have flow.
You act like me writing a poem that isn't funny is some kind of personal offence to you - it's a bit rude.
As I mentioned, I respect that you don't like the poem, however, my issue is with your rather tactles smanner in delivering such dislike when I did little deserve it. Now I have been spoken to and I understand that this wasn't your intention and therefore, I apologise if I seemed perhaps rude in response, however it may be a trigger to be a little more careful with your words in case this happens.
Regards, and thanks for reading it anyway,
Schemilix.
I am not trying to be rude or anything like that, it is oppinion, but this just isnt greatly funny like it is supposed to be. Also no not every poem has flow, but some I think just need it a little better than others.
Oh alright. Well, sorry.
But, it wasn't supposed to be 'greatly funny'. It was supposed to tickle people with a humour similar to mine, but not everyone has the same sense of humour, that I understand just... Your... wording came off as a little... harsh. Yes?
As for the flow... Opinion. You keep yours, I keep mine. I CAN write poems with rythm and flow, but I did not make that decision here.
i guess my issue was that you sort of worded it a bit... harshly and then didn't do anything to make it seem like you weren;t just attacking me. (:
Points: 890
Reviews: 35
Donate