Hi Pompiepoo~ It's been a while!
I'm obviously going to be rusty at reviewing, since I can't even remember the last time I left a review. But I'll tell you what I think, anyway.
First of all, I think the whole concept was really interesting. I like that you used "freedom," a word with a relatively positive connotation, among images that I would perceive as negative. "potholes springing up along your trachea" isn't usually seen as something good, but it's what freedom was. It gives me an idea that the past might have been free, but the narrator didn't see until now that freedom was littered with pain and uncertainty. Or maybe I'm just projecting. But it is what it is.
The device of breathing and organs associated with breathing pulls a nice thread through the beads of the piece. The pace is even, much like breathing, and what the narrator breathes usually ties nicely to the subject discussed at the time. I really like the brick part. For me, bricks are associated with stability and strength, but as you wrote in your piece, stability and strength aren't always the most fulfilling.
Note: I literally just looked up who Anarkali was, like an idiot. Well, I hope you know that the poem is just as good if you don't know who that is. But now I understand more the context that you're going for. You did a very nice job with the whole legend, too.
Now on to some particulars.
Before I looked up who Anarkali was, I wondered who the "you" was in the poem. Now that I know, I still think you should define it a little more clearly. I believe that you were going for Salim or Jahangir with the "you," who was an illicit lover. But when I did not know the context of the legend that you include, I did not know that this person was an illicit lover. Of course, the narrator and "you" were close, but I did not get a romantic context from the relationship. To be honest, I'm not entirely sure if the romantic is necessary here, but if you were going for that, I'm just letting you know that it's not communicated in the piece as well as it could have been.
While I appreciate your imagery and language in the first stand-alone line and first stanza, I don't think that they are needed in the poem. I think starting in with the "do you remember how we were once whole?" is a more effective choice to start the poem. the first bit feels tacked on, like a prologue that isn't quite connected with the rest of the piece.
I enjoy the visual aspect of this piece, though I'm not too sure about the periods in between stanzas. I think it would look cleaner if they weren't there, though if you're having trouble with formatting, please disregard this. Regardless of the errant periods, I like that you used indentation to show the progression of time/feeling.
I agree with Nikayla about your vocabulary. I think that you used some very specific and excellent words, however I wondered about your motivation for using some of them. Bathos, for instance. Though it's a very wonderful and specific word, I wonder how wonderful and specific the majority of your audience would find it. I'm not suggesting that you change this poem too much with vocabulary, but I would probably consider more in the future depending on what tone you're trying to go for. If that makes sense.
Overall, I really enjoyed what you did with this piece. I think that your poetry continues to improve, if that's even possible, and I like your inclusion of an old legend into a modern poem. It gives the feeling that history repeats itself in different ways. I hope that you find this review useful to you! Happy poeting!
Points: 29221
Reviews: 863
Donate