Hello Niraco! :3 Do you have any idea why I am here? Of course you do! (Unless you don't...) TO REVIEW!
Before I begin, I love how you used the last two lines in order to relate with the title. It builds suspense, and for a moment I was going to review this saying, "How does the title in any way relate to the poem itself?" Obviously, I was indeed, proven wrong.
Let the young man weep,
and the old rejoice.
Give the poor man wealth,
and the rich be deprived.
First of all, why do you change the order every time? I noticed this throughout the entire poem. You say something like strong-weak weak-strong strong-weak... instead use a more stable solution (strong-weak strong-weak strong-weak) so it does not produce any hidden confusion for the reader to attend to.
Now that's out of the way, focusing more on these first four lines will most likely help ...
Why is the poem taking something away and giving it to something else? Isn't this more like switching up the situation? The strong become weak and weak become strong?
I am also a little confused of how this can all work out... is this a plead or an order? A demand or something completely different? Most of the things I'm saying here can be easily valid to the rest of the poem.
Otherwise, this actually a nice stanza although I don't see why the young man should weep if the more elderly humans feel like they in particular, don't necessarily have a meaning for life even if they do in some way... get what I'm trying to say? In short, why do the old have to rejoice?
It's not over! The rich may have earned what they have, and the poor may not have paid much attention in school thus creating another hobo in life.
Give the strong man hindrance,
and the weak help.
Let the homless man have a roof,
taken away from he who has too many.
When I see a red squiggly line under a word, I instantly want to nitpick, but I'm sure if you carefully read this, you'll find the problem.
The first two lines (in the quote above the closest) are actually quite knowledgeable in my opinion. If the strong is already strong, what else do they need? If the weak isn't strong, well, they must be helped on such a thing!
EXCEPT!!! (<the two extras are required... I am so sorry...)
The last two lines are dark and terrible. He who has too many? WHO WOULD HAVE TOO MANY? It was well earned! Homeless? Too BAD!! They didn't earn it! They should've paid attention in school or paid attention to everyday life and how harsh reality is! (although I still do pity them!)
Let the world be joined,
rather than hidden in seclusion.
This is a wonderful ending that finally fulfills the title's cause, however it still doesn't make sense at all to the rest of the poem. Try saying to yourself what the last two lines are supposed to mean... you might get it.
All in all it was okay... though you couldn't use its FULL POTENTIAL!
My rating:
8/10
Keep writing!
~Kitty
Points: 5041
Reviews: 103
Donate