z
  • Home

Young Writers Society


E - Everyone

Don't Follow Your Passion, A life lesson

by Monsters


This will be going up onto a tech blog with my name on it and could reflect badly for my reputation in the tech industry so hit me hard with criticisms if you can. It is meant to generate views as much as be highly reputable link others can share.



Everyone hears this life advice at least one million times in high school. They say if you don’t know what you’re going to do in college, just “follow your passion.” It is sort of the blanket statement to handle all the children’s problems as the adults handle adulting.

It’s so bad that when I say I didn’t have a passion going into college, I run the risk of every employer dooming me to a life of mediocrity but I say nay to them anyway. See, I am a very brave man when I state that when I went to college I was not passionate about Computer Science. In fact, when I went to college my main concern was cash money *GASP*. These are the words that summon fear among the greatest of conformists.

What is everyone in such a rush for anyway? In pre K they start asking children what they want to be when they grow up. Yes, they’re asking children things they know nothing about. They know firefighters are heroes but how can they know they want to be one before they can grasp basic functioning of their hands? But maybe they’re just asking because kids are cute. The point is when kids get pimply and not so cute anymore the intent of the question is more along the lines of digging up this fantasy that will turn them into the next Warren Buffet, Steve Jobs or *insert your favorite person here*.

This is a crazy Idea but what if we just aren’t born with a predestined passion. That all of these people who say they have a passion since they were born are really just fooling themselves in an attempt to be happy or extraordinary? We don’t like to talk about this subject because there doesn’t really seem to be an answer if this is false. Why just throw salt on people’s wounds by telling them they are just passionless creatures?

You know those types of quotes you yawn at because they attempt to be artsy by defining some abstract and obscure message you can only recognize after you experienced it first hand? Don’t you hate those? Well here it is; "Life isn't about finding yourself, it's about creating yourself" [4].

One of my horrible mistakes was thinking I should be more interested when I should have been cultivating my passion instead. That is instead of following this mythical creature of passion that we are apparently born with I should have been developing my skill because even the little fraction I have learned about Computer Science has made me more interested in it. Perhaps, passion isn’t actually free but is something we have to work very hard to get?

I learned in college that cultivating this passion about something requires that you pick up a skill and fail to change it so many times that you can appreciate and comprehend its complexity. This does not mean to learn a subject inside and out, it means trying to change it and believe it or not this comes after you’ve learned and studied all you can about it.

An interesting dilemma in Computer Science is what we refer to as FizzBuzz problems and they are practically made for PhD professors who fail at even the simplest tasks like telling a computer to count from 1 to 10 in a programming language on their resume[2]. For Non-Tech Savy people this is the equivalent of a professor with a PhD in math to not know how to do long division.

The point is that just learning the ins and outs of the profession is not enough to even get more interested, it is not enough to even be a professional let alone cultivate a passion for the skill. In skill acquisition, you learn the basics of the skill like these PhD professors did and after you realize you barely know anything at all, you practice and hone your craft to becoming an expert. In skill acquisition practicing is actually required to even do anything in the skill and apparently some people don't understand that at all. It’s like learning everything there is too know about hula hooping and not ever actually hula hooping. It’s weird that these professionals cannot do the basic tasks, huh?

How long does it actually take to become what we think PhD’s know? Somewhere along 10,000 hours of practicing and honing the craft [3]. Before you freak out 10,000 hours is simply the point when practice and ability happen too asymptote. It doesn’t mean it takes 10,000 hours to become passionate, it'll happen along the way.

And this post is actually not even about terminology or picking on so called experts in the Computer Science field at all. It’s not about asserting who is passionate and who is not. It is about students being pressured into thinking that they should be passionate and in turn fooling themselves or giving up on a practice because they don't meet these criteria. Why do we keep insinuating by innuendo that college is only for the type of people who’ve are already been passionate? Why do we think that students who aren’t passionate are somehow, behind? It's no wonder that 50 to 70% of students change their major at least one time in college [2]. Don’t you think that might have something to do with paranoia because you keep telling them there is something wrong with them?

The fact is, that while no study or conclusive evidence has proven that passion is cultivated, it is something that I've experienced first hand and something that you too will have to experience first hand. That may seem that it is all talk and no substance. It is in a way but it can actually be tested by simply trying it. After you sunk some time into a subject by learning and practicing it, simply observe whether or not you are more interested in it. And don't think a couple of months is enough here; the first couple of months actually terrible because you have to learn alot of stuff. If you are even a little more interested, then what makes you think that this will change the more time that you put in?

If you want to find passion in your life, spend 10,000 hours in a skill, any skill. Just stick to one skill and take it wherever it takes you. It is that simple. You’ll find that passion by following its intellectual pursuit. And stop changing your major.

Of course, if you don’t believe me then you can take solace in the fact that until you took the time to spend 10,000 hours learning that skill, there is no way you can comprehend it in all its entirety. And how could you possibly be passionate about something you cannot understand? 



1. http://blog.codinghorror.com/why-cant-programmers-...

2. http://sites.laverne.edu/careers/what-can-i-do-wit...

3. http://aubreydaniels.com/pmezine/expert-performanc...

4. Quote suggested by user @pretzelstick in my rough draft blog on topic. quote is by George Bernard


Is this a review?


  

Comments



User avatar
56 Reviews

Points: 4997
Reviews: 56

Donate
Tue Jul 03, 2018 1:21 pm
View Likes
aulyasela3597 wrote a review...



Following your passion is not enough. I think at some point it could be a trap, if someone doesn’t think carefully about it.

You have also to think on how your passion could benefit or bring values to other people. Because that is the only way you could live. People can get money because they do something that is valuable to other, so there will be a transaction of value, whatever form the value is.

For example, if you have passion of teaching, you should find ways for your passion to benefit other, whether you teach on school, or starting some education organization. If you love travelling, you should find ways that while you’re travelling, you could give values to others, either you could make a travel blog or informative videos, or anything. If you are valuable, there will always be someone who will give you reward (money, support, network, etc). So, you need creatively think of how to make your passion valuable to others and persevere.

So, instead of following your passion, you should bring values to others passionately. By that, you will live your life to the fullest.




User avatar
125 Reviews

Points: 59
Reviews: 125

Donate
Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:24 pm
Songmorning wrote a review...



Hello, Songmorning here! The title of your essay caught my eye. Though I fear this review might be too late, since you've likely already submitted this essay, I see it still needs another review. I hope I can be helpful! I'll try to make some general statements that you can use in future essays.

Perhaps, passion isn’t actually free but is something we have to work very hard to get?

I love the thesis of your essay! It's very insightful and encouraging. Before your thesis statement, I was getting the impression that you were saying that people who do have a passion are all wrong, and it bugged me because I do have a passion--but as the essay continued, I came to see that you were saying something different. It makes me excited to think that you can develop a passion simply by understanding a subject in greater depth. It's not something I've thought of much because of the common notion that passions are innate rather than developed. Although I do believe there are some innate interests and talents people have, that doesn't contradict what you've said here. It makes me hopeful that as I continue to pursue childcare, I'll begin to love it more. I've worried that, though I want to care for children, I haven't found in myself a particularly strong passion yet while working with them. But if the first few months are the hardest, and then greater interest and passion begin to develop, I don't have to worry at all!

So your thesis was excellent, and your argument was persuasive. Excellent job. I do have some general comments and nitpicks on your presentation, however.

The style you've written in is noticeably casual. Although I'd say a little casualness is all right for a blog (since it seems this will be submitted online rather than to professors in a university), it could be toned back a bit--made a little more formal. Starting the second paragraph with "It's so bad..." for example, made me wonder what exactly "It" was, since "It" was referring to a very general abstraction. The sentence starting with "You know those types of quotes you yawn at..." also felt overly casual, and also a bit in-my-face because you were suddenly talking to me and assuming I was yawning at things that I don't necessarily yawn at.

The words and phrases with asterisks around them could also be taken out to create a more professional tone. *GASP* is a bit melodramatic and could be removed without affecting the meaning of the paragraph. *insert your favorite person here* could be replaced with "etc." to sound more formal.

Asking questions like "What is everyone in such a rush for anyway?" and calling yourself a "very brave man" came across to me as overdramatic and even a bit arrogant in tone--as if you're the only person who's ever thought of this. I don't think it was your intent to make it sound like that, but you can get across the same idea of having a counter-cultural thesis by simply stating it more formally. In fact, you don't even have to give any explicit statement of having an unusual idea. Remember, every essay tries to present a new or different idea, but most don't come out and directly call it new.

As for the phrases and sentences in bold, I'd discourage that if you were submitting this as a paper to a college professor, but for a tech blog, it might just be part of a common format for blogs. It's your choice whether to take it or leave it.

I hope this is helpful. You told us to hit you hard with criticisms, so I hope I didn't come across as overly critical. I really did like the essay, and I think it's an excellent point of view to keep in mind. Keep up the good work!

~Songy




Monsters says...


Hello, I've been wondering why the post seems so egotistical so thanks for pointing that out. I wanted to write casual like many of the popular blogs because acedemic writing wouldn't get what I wanted across. This is more about personal experience than a congregation of scientific studies, but you convinced me that I should focus my tone with a little more formalness. Thanks.



User avatar
53 Reviews

Points: 210
Reviews: 53

Donate
Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:32 am
jumpingsheep wrote a review...



Hello! jumpingsheep here!
I thought that the topic you chose for this article was extremely intriguing. I'll be a college student next year and I found this piece to be especially relevant.
Just a few (really nitpicky!) notes:
--In the second paragraph, you use the phrase "cash money". I think you could probably eliminate one of these words, as "cash money" is a bit redundant.
--I noticed that a few times you used asterisks to indicate an action. I don't know how formal this blog is, but I think that the use of the *action* asterisks may be too informal in some contexts.
--The first sentence of the fourth paragraph is a bit awkward to read. I think that main thing is that you ask a question in this sentence, but do not end with a quotation mark. There are a few other spots like this... I would recommend reading this piece out loud to catch some of those spots!

I found the denouement that you reached at the end of this to be rather profound! I really liked how you built up to the conclusion that hard work may create passion for something.
In this work, I think you brought up a valid argument, one that many people can relate to.

Keep up the good work and let me know if you have any questions!





Follow your inner moonlight; don't hide the madness
— Allen Ginsburg