Hey there, I see this has been in the green room for a while, so I figured I'd bring it out of there for you I'll hopefully be able to help you in finishing this too!
So. Unlike Sacredlege, I'm a bit of a softy with this stuff, so you'll probably get a lot more gushing from this review. On top of that, this piece also resonated with me quite a lot due to recent personal stuff, so that definitely helped me connect with what you've got going here. On the whole, I really enjoyed this. Some of your imagery was lovely, and I'm a huge fan of writing styles such as yours, primarily due to the fact my writing is as unpoetic as writing can get. I just can't write like this, and so I hold much jealousy right now. Something I especially like here is the fact this is from a male POV because it shows that hey, guys have emotions and suffer from heartbreak too, and that's a great thing to show. Well, in all fairness, I don't think you specified the narrator being a guy at any point--it could be a gay relationship being discussed here--but I'm kind of assuming he is. I like the monologue style you have here too, you don't see many stories written like this. So yus. A big thumbs up from me overall.
In regards to critiques, one thing I do agree with from Sacredlege's review is the comment made regarding to overdoing it a little with the poetic language. This is very much a personal viewpoint--some readers will want as many intricate, descriptive sentences as possible--but I do think there's such thing as too much, and you do overstep that lie occasionally here. I'm not going to ramble on about this because it's already been explained brilliantly in your other review, so you hardly want me here sounding like a broken record, but what I will say is that it's something that can be fixed quite easily. It's a lot easier to go back and simplify things than to go back and complicate them. Simply erasing some words and simplifying phrasing can work wonders for this issue, so it's not a massive one. You just need to strike the balance between pretty and poetic, and simple to understand and follow.
I think the main thing I was left wondering after reading this were the detail of your narrator's relationship. You sort of tip toed around their relationship and why it broke down, but I can't help feeling like I've left this with a small sense of emptiness. I mean, why did the relationship break down? We never really find out. I get the idea that the narrator himself doesn't quite understand why, but I think it would actually be a pretty cool concept for you to hint to us readers what went wrong, show us signs of the relationship breaking down e.t.c. without the narrator himself realising them. Err, if that makes any sense whatsoever. It's just that without us having some kind of sense of what went right and what went wrong here, it's difficult to create a sense of empathy within your readers unless they have a personal connection to this sort of story like I do. It just adds substance to everything, y'know?
On a similar note, what exactly is so great about this chick? You've got your narrator gushing over here and how wonderful she is, but we don't see any of that wonderfulness. I mean, she kind of just seems like a bit of a dick. Perhaps that's exactly the impression you wanted to give, but even so, I want to feel like I know this girl as a person, not as some afterthought of a piece of writing. This will further increase the empathy within your readers, so it's a win-win situation. Who is she?What about her made your narrator fall in love? Even some physical description could help. I mean, what does she look like? is she a classic beauty with long hair and pretty features, or is she more of an alternative beauty? Her character itself is more important, of course, but a physical description would add another layer to her character. As in the last critique, it's all about adding substance to strengthen the story as a whole.
There's just one more thing I want to add, though there's a 50/50 chance this is me just beign dumb. That happens a lot. Basically, I noticed that you referred to the girl in this with a varying narrative stance. By which I mean one moment you were referring to the girl in third person, and then you'd go on to use second person as if addressing the girl herself. Was that intentional? It's a little confusing, and I did find myself questioning whether the same girl was being discussed at times. I might just be majorly missing something innovative and creative you've done here--probably am, knowing me--but if that is an accident, I'd suggest reading back through this and editing it accordingly.
Anywho, I think that's it. This was a really great read for me, and even though I do think it could be toned down in places, I do love the prettiness of your writing. Sacredlege left you such a great review that I feel a little useless here, to be honest. I don't want to just parrot stuff he said, but also want to have something half decent to say, so it's a little tricky. I hope I have been able to help you with this in some shape or form though, and be sure to let me know if there's something you want me to explain further, or if you just generally want to chat with me about this review on the whole.
Keep writing,
xoxo Sins
Points: 44360
Reviews: 1087
Donate