Okay, so I have actually listened to Welcome to Nightvale (I've only gotten to the Election and Strexcorp Arc, so please don't spoil me) which made me slightly confused when I read this and there was no Lovecraftian surrealism involved. However much I love Welcome to Nightvale, I don't think referencing it would fit this particular work (even though Nightvale does show hints of political messages and American values in it, however morphed those values are). Especially considering Nightvale isn't exactly a celebration of Nightvale and all of it's values (like this podcast would celebrate American ideals), rather Nightvale reads more like the everyday going-ons of an Orwellian nightmare that happens to be better than the overwrought capitalist cult of Strexcorp--in other words, framing the Redacted and America through a WTNV reference sounds like you're comparing Nightvale to the American Dream, which I don't think is the point you're trying to make (but it's an interesting point on paper). Though that's my personal reading of WTNV, you may defend your own if you'd like. And as a reference, it's still pretty interesting.
But I diggress. Onto the work!
Rules of the Game (Harris)- In ‘Rules of the Game’ Waverly is a chess playing prodigy. Her mother, Mrs. Jong, takes advantage of this by showing her off to neighbors as if she were a trophy. How tacky!
I feel like tacky is a word you'd use to describe a garish sweater, which I suppose can be used for using your child as a trophy, but I prefer something a little stronger. Or nothing at all, considering the fact that you describe the mother showing off the child like a trophy, which is pretty bad--you don't need to tell the audience it's bad.
It is only when Waverly lashes out at her mother for her actions that she becomes angry and stops using Waverly to show off.
Who's 'she' in the bolded one? The mother or Waverly?
It also shows how social class can change and that poverty is not permanent in America. Waverly learns to play Chess and changes her life forever by becoming popular.
These two sentences don't connect. What does poverty have to do with popularity? How does poverty even connect to the synopsis you described? Was Waverly poor?
It also reflects the American ideal of opportunity because the boys were able to get a job, go to school, maintain a normal lifestyle, and attain their hopes and dreams. There was so much more opportunity in America in comparison to Sudan.
"There were many more opportunities in America compared to Sudan" is a better fit. If you can count it, it's using 'many'--if you can't count it, it's using 'much'. I guess you can technically still count opportunities, whereas things like love needs 'much' (so much love, so much water, etc).
Rice and Rose Bowl Blues (Sierra)- The girl wanted to be like one of the boys; playing football and not having responsibilities, but her mother wanted her to be lady-like and do all the things that girls her age should know how to.
You didn't explain why this story exemplifies the American ideals. I don't think so, anyway.
Anyway, a nice podcast script. Hope my review helped.
--Elliot.
Points: 19607
Reviews: 383
Donate