This was a little unexpected. When I clicked on it, I didn't know what to expect and I certainly was surprised. It's great, but to me, you're walking the fine line between just the right amount of complicated and too complicated. You're very fond of figurative language and you almost approach a Ken Kesey-esque style in your frequent digressions to expand on the descriptions. In some places, it worked and it was brilliant, but in some places, it just seemed forced. You could probably distinguish between the places where you really felt that the metaphor or simile got your point across more completely versus where you just included it for the sake of including it.
This next critique is based on the fact that you said this was part of a novel. I actually want to go into editing someday, so this was great practice; thank you! That being said, I feel like you're trying to hard to use extensive vocabulary. I'm somebody who also naturally tends towards elevated diction, but sometimes, simple is better, especially when you've already just such complicated content. I feel like you could come across as pretentious even though I don't think you're trying to be. Even if you don't seem pretentious, however, I still think that you could possibly lose some of your readers using that kind of language.
I don't know how caught up you are over proper grammar, but with the language you're currently using, I wouldn't recommend writing fragments. It works for some authors, but it's awkward in your sophisticated style.
I want to reiterate that I think you've done a great job and I think the general issue I found was simply synthesizing all the aspects of your style. Keep writing and I'm sure you'll have great success. Hope this helps!
Points: 2997
Reviews: 26
Donate