Hi Katherine3laine,
This is a little too short. Short poems can work, but only if every word has the appropriate punch and gravitas to really leave an impact in the reader's mind. This (currently) doesn't have that. You've got an idea, but you haven't really delved into its potential yet. You've laid the groundwork of some potential analogies and metaphors (leaves, autumn, secrets) but you haven't done enough to engage the reader in what you're trying to say yet.
I found some of your language confusing, too. Do leaves ever really snake between bricks? It's an odd verb to use, and while I commend trying a unique usage, I didn't really understand what you meant. Perhaps you wanted to tie in the idea of secrets and snakes and lies and the idea of serpents being historically pernicious and wicked. I don't know, but it didn't work for me. Because I just can't work out how rusting leaves really snake between bricks. Unless we're talking about ivy? But you haven't mentioned ivy. You should mention ivy if you mean ivy. It's always better to be specific than vague in poetry (unless you have a good reason to be vague).
Here's an example, then, of how your first two lines could be instead:
The coming autumn rusts the ivy
snaking between the copper bricks.
I've tried to make your first line more active rather than passive (and therefore has more punch). I changed the tense a little and threw in a little adjective for the bricks. This helps tie an image of "rust" and "copper" with the reader, along with an image of snaking ivy. This sets you up for the rest of a good poem about secrets in a house behind the ivy. I'm not saying my two lines are brilliant but just showing you how you could revise this poem into something a lot more. This is how poetry revision can work: by analysing every word you've used, how you've used it, why you've used it, and what can be done to improve it.
Good luck.
Points: 18178
Reviews: 1259
Donate