Hello there and happy RevMo (even if I am a bit late to the reviewing party)! I, a bold Knight of the Green Room, am here today to review you.
First impressions first: this was really, really long. Except it actually isn't, but it feels like it is because I had to scroll so far down to reach this comment box, and the biggest reason for that is because you have all these spaces in between the individual lines that just spaces this piece out even more than it needs to be.
There are a few ways to fix this issue of excessive white space between lines, and this article goes over multiple methods in-depth, though this one is also really good.
As far as the contents of the piece go, I feel the unrhymed half is very bare and literal, with very little to distinguish it from just regular prose. If anything, I think it would be more engaging in prose form because then maybe there would be a bit more description than raw exposition, which is basically what makes up the first half in its entirety.
The rhyming half was a lot less raw exposition, which was a major improvement from a poetic standpoint, but it also wasn't actually rhyming for much of its length. There is more to rhyming than having the words at the end of lines sound the same, and without the corresponding rhythm providing the underlying pattern, rhymes fall completely apart. As a matter of fact, between rhythm and raw rhyme, it's the rhythm that matters more as a strong enough rhythm will carry an off-rhyme so that it goes unnoticed, whereas even words that are perfect rhymes can sound off if the rhythm is off.
Rhythm is the reason why "the quite hot pot is black" doesn't sound like a rhyme compared to "the black pot is quite hot" despite both phrases containing the exact same words.
The easiest way to match rhythms to rhymes is to count syllables, though if you go a step further and match up the patters of stresses, your rhymes will be even stronger.
As it stands, with how literal the first half was, the second half felt quite redundant to me.
To answer your questions, I will forever love and adore rhyming poetry when it is done well. That isn't to say that I think rhyming poetry is inherently better than non-rhyming, but form poems are my favorites, and rhyming form poems are my most favorite of all. It really comes down to personal preference.
I don't have any issues with the form (once you iron out the excessive white space issue, that is), and it has certainly been done before. The proper term for works like these are companion poems, or companion pieces for the more general case.
As for your final question, I believe I've already answered it earlier, but the short answer in this case is no, because I found the second half redundant.
Points: 72525
Reviews: 1220
Donate