In your response to my obviously misplaced attempt at providing at least the slightest bit of reassurance and support, you claimed that I should focus more on your work. Now, first I thought it'd be best to leave this work alone, especially after being lashed out at, but every work deserves a review and I need a sense of completion.
So be it, here's an honest review. Fair warning though, I'm an advocate of honest and fair reviewsmanship. So I'm looking at it from a purely technical standpoint here. No feelings involved whatsoever.
One thing strikes me immediately, and that is the strange category choice. Your work is, without the shadow of a doubt, written in prose. I don't see a reason to categorize it as poetry. Just a minor detail, maybe an accident, but whatever, moving on. Not really important.
As for the content itself, I do quite like the use of the stages of grief. It adds a nice tone to the overall work, gives it a gimmick (for the lack of a better word, although gimmick does have a somewhat derogatory vibe) of sorts that I can definitely appreciate. However, you missed bargaining. Bargaining is an essential stage of grief, and you seem to have forgotten to mention it. I'd look over the work and add that bit just for completion ("Had I done this, surely things could have been different," etc.).
The way you describe the process of despising oneself through such toil seems sufficient. Adds a bit of insight. But it has been written like that before. If, however, you could find a way to set yourself apart from others writing about similar topics, it'd lift your work above theirs. See, that seems to be a running theme with common topics. Writers don't do enough to add something new to the table and often end up not interesting the reader. And, after all, interesting one's reader is possibly one of the most important aspects of a good piece of literature. Not that I'm particularly good at garnering interest myself, but I rest my case.
Grammatically, the work seems to be without any glaring flaws. Nice change of pace as well. Good job on that. Speaking of pace, the pacing was good enough, although the story is quite short, so your pacing couldn't really show its true colors. It's a damn shame too. I'd extend the story just a tad if I were you.
Anyway, your piece does what it's supposed to do. Grammar is fine, form seems alright, but it's not poetry, rather prose, and it could have done with a little more length. Perhaps more details, more drawn out descriptions? Since it is a work hinging on feelings and thoughts, you might try to extend those feelings and thoughts, add a touch of philosophy. That's my suggestion, anyway.
Got nothing to say other than that. The final paragraph is by far the best of the bunch, because it's written in a more lyrical, poetic fashion overall, something that's necessary for works of this sort.
Peace be with you! Future hopeful IDF combat volunteer signing out!
Points: 1689
Reviews: 52
Donate