Being rewritten as of 18/06
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hi Esme, I'm going to be reviewing this.
Be warned I do get rather...nitpicky...and I'm feeling incredibly tired this morning, which is not helping my mood, but I promise you I'll review as civilly as I can.
Ehh...usually, in writing, you want to avoid the "there was" construction as often as possible; it feels kind of boring and awkward, especially for a first sentence. Try something more active, like "dead animals floated" in the bay or something.
"Wanted"? Do you "waiting"? O_o
I know you mean that the boy is ten, but it's not that clear on a first read. I think the sentence would also read better if you said "a girl not much older" instead of "not much older girl". Also, I'm a bit confused as to who exactly is gazing into the waters.
The Viscount is the boy, right?
??
I'm a bit confused about what's going on here, in part because I'm not sure who's coughing--the Countless or her daughter? I do like the imagery here, though; it's concrete without being overwrought.
Now I'm lost as to who Lana is, in part because I don't know who said this. O_o
I don't know if silence and chilly night winds are exactly connected (typically, winds make noise?). Maybe say that everyone fell silent (which I think you're trying to say), and then add that a chilly night wind is slithering. I like that imagery, btw, of slithering wind.
This'd read better as "two servants armed with kitchen knives".
Who are the "two boys"? The servants? In that case, I think it'd be better to just say "servants" again. Also, the last sentence is a bit...eh. I think I understand what you're trying to get across, but it's not entirely clear. Unfortunately I can't think of a better way to phrase it (fat lot of help I am).
On a rather stupider note, I do like the word "ne'er-do-wells". It just has...this way of rolling off the tongue, doesn't it?
Meh, I'm not liking this use of "looked-for", it feels kind of...stilted? Maybe it'd be better to just say "the ship they were waiting for" or something along those lines.
Wow, this is a lot of information, really quickly. I couldn't really digest it all right away. Perhaps instead of giving so much information at once, just make a kind of...vague foreshadowing reference that Imilian has caused a lot of trouble or whatnot. That would add some suspense and make it easier on your readers, to boot.
Imilian Valkarad.
I like this description of the Count; it says a lot in a few words and gives the reader a very clear image of what kind of person he is. Good job.
"Exhausted" and "weak" kind of mean the same thing in this context; just stick with one.
I like this sentence; it's very short and emphatic and connects two ideas (the count being home, the war being over) very clearly. However, I think you mean "Count", not "Cont".
Ha ha, nice. You've done a good job introducing us to to this new character and giving us a very distinct impression of his character without telling us that he's this kind of person (haughty, bad-tempered). This is like...the perfect example of showing instead of telling. *feels jealous*
I like this, too, as it gives us more insight into di Ariont's character, and also lets us know what hte language is like (although I'm unsure which language you're referring to...this is probably just me being bad about fantasy, but I can't tell the countries apart). Does di Ariont oppose Valkarad?
There's something about the "in one" phrase that bothers me...again, I know what you're trying to say, but I think there's a better way to say it.
I don't think you need the "in di Ariont's opinion" part, since you've already firmly established that the viewpoint character in this section is di Ariont.
"which he shared" would sound better, I think.
Again, "laden with papers" would be better after "desk".
LAWLZ. Another wonderful example of di Ariont's voice.
More lulz. I really like di Ariont's voice; it's so distinct and snarky.
“… political immunity protected him, but Valkarad spent exactly ten years in the Citadel under the strictest rigors. His role in the Caligny Tragedies remains undefined. Lord Rubrin, who is the captain of guard in the Citadel, says that whatever Valkarad was, he is not now. He claims that Valkarad-”
Wait, di Ariont knows every word in the report? Then why is he asking for it to be read to him? Unless my sleepiness is making me inattentive and I missed something...
I feel like this should be "seemed", not "seems".
Again, I like the look into di Ariont's mind, but I'm so completely lost as to who's who in all these countries and whatnot...are di Ariont and Valkarad countrymen, or from opposite countries? O_o
I think you mean "what he had written".
Oh, goodness...so much, so soon... *feels disoriented* Perhaps this is my problem from being unable to tell the countries apart...
I don't think it's possible to be calculating and bleary-eyed at the same time. O_o
Which girl's room? And why would di Ariont have a little girl's diary?
Dearest Diary,
Who's Rinnie? However, I really like the way this diary entry is written: it seems like something a young girl really would write and has a very distinctive voice. I lulzed at the "Emperor (may he live forever and ever)" bits. And the last sentence. It's so very cute... Although I'm confused what the plot relevance of the diary is (or why di Ariont has it).
Ha ha ha. Again, nice display of di Ariont's character.
Overall thoughts--
All right, if you couldn't tell, I was actually completely lost as to what the plot was. All I'm aware of is that there are two countries who don't like each other, that Valkarad managed to set a war off but now the war is over, and, um...yeah. In part it's because I'm not sure which is which when it comes to the countries, and also because I don't know who the protagonist is. I get the feeling it's not di Ariont, but then I don't know who else it could be because the first part of the story was written from omniscient perspective. So yeah, you might want to do some clarification plot-wise; maybe start with introducing a formal protagonist to revolve the plot around early on.
That being said, I do like your characters, especially di Ariont--you did a wonderful job characterizing him without ever telling us anything about him: you just let his own actions and thoughts speak for themselves. He feels fully-realized, three-dimensional, and a real person with his quirks and opinions. Great job. Well, maybe I just like him because I've got a weakness for snarkers, but I really do feel he's a very well-written character. And the little girl who wrote the diary, even though I don't know who she is, had a very distinctive voice as well.
The Countess in the first part of the story was also characterized well; you did a good job showing her relative poverty (the servants as guards, the paste jewels) without telling us outright, as well as displaying her weakness. Even Valkarad, though he only showed up for about one line, managed to leave a clear impression on me as to what kind of person he was. I'd say the only characters that need some work are the two kids (is one of them going to be the protagonist?).
Your prose is sound, except for your habit of placing modifiers in front of instead of after the noun (it's fine both ways, I guess, but I feel it reads easier if they're after), and could be rather stilted and unclear at times in the first part. It was perfectly fine in the second part, though; I feel that narrowing the focus to di Ariont helped streamline your prose a bit as opposed to the omniscient format, so maybe find a distinct narrator for the first part as well?
Overall, I'd say that this would be a fine work if you clarified the plot somewhat (don't be afraid to dump some background on the reader, because sometimes infodumps are necessary!), and maybe introduced an identifiabel protagonist early on. Still, I'm intrigued, and definitely would be reading more. And I think I've already mentioned how much I love di Ariont.
The best of luck in your endeavors!
Lily and mike,
Thank you for the terrific critiques, I really do appreciate you going over my piece. Right now I’m done with some of the minor issues (rephrasing, and then my “m” and “n” keys tend to become one and the same). Ha, but spelling mistakes and such always look perfectly well to the one who wrote them, sadly enough.
The diary entry is of Feliskian’s daughter, but as I’m writing it after the fact, I don’t suppose it helps. But you’re absolutely right, it needs to be cleaned up. Will be, too.
As to the whole politics thing – the trade, obviously the girl, also, and the writing to the king, etc., well, I guess it didn’t turn out to well. I think that maybe in my haste to not write info dumps I did the other way around. I’ll keep that in mind when rewriting – I’ll probably want to smoothen things, as you said, and expand a bit.
Again, thank you for reading,
Esme
Edit. To reviewer below:
That was an incredibly helpful review which must have taken a lot lot of time. But the other side of the medal is that it’s very very appreciated – thank you. As was said in the PM, everything is now stored (as with all reviews) in a folder on my computer, to be reread when rewriting. Thanks again.
Of what age? I looked through the preceding sentences, and you may be referring to ten years, which was how long the woman had been waiting, but It's too hard to discern that. I shouldn't have to read back like that.
For this to make sense you'll need a comma after "eyes". Either that or some rephrasing is needed.
Move the "armed with kitchen knives" part after "servants".
Change "them" to "then".
You mean "envoy" not "envou", and" Meriadossan", not "Meriadossam" (at least according to what you have written later).
I'm not sure what you're trying to say in the middle bit between the commas. Try rephrasing it to make it more clear.
Other than a few wording problems and typos, I thought this was great! Your descriptions are vivid, and you use words that stand out in the reader's mind. The opening paragraph was a great mood setter, by the way. Overall I really liked it. Good luck with the rest of this.
Hey Esme, I have no idea what the title of this story means, but oh well, I’m reading and reviewing it!
The word choice is a little shaky here though I like the idea and the feel of it. Try something more like this maybe: “The air was cold and stale, reeking deeply with the perpetual stench of rats, mice, and all other filth in need of disposal.” Or something similar to that.
You’ve put a lot of importance on those rats and mice, too much, and this mention of them can go. This is repetition that you don’t need and in my opinion, this sentence is far more powerful without it.
This sounds rather…well, poor because it could more simply be written: “Two servants, armed with kitchen knives, stood not far away…”
I don’t completely understand this section because I can’t decipher just what it is you’re trying to tell us. I think what you want to say is more like: “It was a war that tore international trade into tatters. Meriadossa had alienated the East and West.”
I think you have a comma and a semicolon mixed up here.
“A tired moral, not a legend; tall and thin, a stick of a man.”
I should also mention that this is a rather messy fragment of words and though fragments can be powerful at times, it can do good to write in whole sentences too. Short and powerful though, remember that.
‘did’ should be ‘had’ for the sake of tenses and such and ‘see’ should be ‘seen’.
I like this section because it gives a good sense of characterization and lets you see a better part of di Ariont.
There wasn’t much I wanted to really nitpick about throughout the rest. I liked it quite a bit, through I would like to know who it is that wrote the diary entry…because I’m not completely sure.
Dialogue
This is probably one of my favorite parts of this story because the dialogue isn’t too outrageous and it in fact blends in quite nicely. Most dialogue set in this type of time zone can sound choppy and out of place but this flows very smoothly.
Plot
One of my only real problems is in your plot because I did get a little lost. There are so many characters being introduced at once that I don’t know what to do with all of them at once. It could do with being paced out a little more smoothly.
Characters
However, though I did have keeping track of the characters, I did like the personalities of each because they all had their own distinct personalities, which is awesome. Now it’s just a matter of getting a better feel for each character as well as figuring out who is the villain and who is the good guy.
Style
Overall, I liked the style that you wrote this in, though there were a few places that words seemed out of order or where a word seemed to be missing. All it takes to fix these things is to read everything slowly and carefully.
Any questions, just hit the PM button.
~lilymoore