Let's be honest for a minute; we're all frauds comparatively. We review your work in the same semblance of a customer on yelp talking about their fries being to cold or something. We know nothing about the business that went in to this, we only care deeply about making ourselves to be important for some type of meaning in our own lives. Your poem has become about us. We dissect it like it was a frog talking in depth about the technicalities that we think makes it whole - like an equation that we can insert into any poem to get some quick 'review points.'
When you really read into this there is one major theme that connects each stanza. It's the feeling of utter frustration in the character never being able to really connect with the world - it could and probably is people - but it probably is also deeper and more fundamental then that. It's an utterly unexplainable expectation of reality that frustrates them-- why is it that a person who opens their arms and lets people - still has a NEED for it.
Instinct is a word that can point to a direction of the entity at play here and yet, it describes to us something totally out of place -- the word might be technically right but the feeling for it is irreproachable.
Your expectation for so long is that the action of opening up is never quite reciprocated with a feeling of satisfaction. The poem is trailing off because they are inner thoughts depicting something with much greater meaning - the natural self in a means of anxiety ridden existence - where thoughts do - in fact - trail off until they are trapped in this meaningless rumbling.
When the other reviewer talks about closure, I feel like they didn't read the same poem, the whole point to me is that there is no closure. Not everything is so simple in this cycle of anxiety/dissociation.
Excellently told, written and executed as usual.
Points: 33
Reviews: 131
Donate