Hello Amy. Since this looks like a school assignment, I'll be reviewing this as thoroughly as possible. Let me know if you have any questions about anything I mention.
Overall, this looks like the start of a persuasive essay arguing against code switching in schools. Your general structure is okay, though you could definitely improve the execution, particularly of the introduction.
Introductions have two main purposes: to introduce what you are writing about and why you are writing about it. Right now, the biggest issue with your introduction is that you haven't explained with code switching is, even though you've provided a lot of examples and context for it.
I would recommend starting your essay with the definition of code switching before you get into the examples or explanations (since those are part of the development/body). Starting out with "Code switching is ___." and then talking about the different dialects people have would help your readers understand your topic a lot more easily.
You do an okay job with introducing why you're writing about code switching by focusing on the difference between casual and professional communication, so you don't need to change much in the first paragraph.
I recommend moving the first sentence of your first paragraph to be the first sentence of your second paragraph. The ideas flow a lot better that way, especially after you develop the introduction a bit more.
I would also recommend introducing the controversy about code switching in schools a bit earlier, right before or at the same time as you cite the quote from the article. A lead-in like "However, not everyone thinks that code switching is a good thing." would help transition between the facts and the opinions. Right now, all the opinions are lumped together at the end (which isn't a bad thing) in their own section separate from the rest of the essay (which is generally not a good thing unless that was the format required for the assignment).
Now for some specific areas of improvement:
You have a lot of repetition in this, and while repeating ideas can help reinforce them and make them stronger, repeating things right after (and in the same sentence in some cases) does the exact opposite. A lot of examples of this can be found in your second paragraph, such as in this sentence: "One of the main reasons for code switching is to try to fit in, although in school it occurs mostly because of professionalism, fitting in is a large factor as well." I would recommend restructuring this sentence to something more like "Although code switching in school occurs mostly because of professionalism, fitting in is a large factor as well." It is a lot less redundant and easier to read.
Your citations need a lot of work, not just in how you incorporate the quotes into your writing, but also in how you cite the source itself. I'm not sure if you've been taught how to use a citation format like MLA or if you were told to use the format you did, but typically, when citing sources online, the link is included after the quote or paraphrase in parentheses as (Source) and a list of all the sources is provided at the end of the piece. To give you an example:
“And in that beautiful line of thinking, one could argue that there’s a time to talk in dialect and a time to talk like you’re in mixed company.” (Source)
[rest of the essay]
Sources Cited
"The Whens and Wheres of Code Switching and 'Talking Black'" by Janelle Harris (2013)
If you're going to be giving a hard copy out, having a list of the sources you used at the end of the piece is even more important, and instead of using "Source", you can use either the author's name (preferred) or a shortened version of the full title (ex. "The Whens and Wheres...").
In any case, you're missing a link to the "Five Reasons Why People Code-Switch" article.
You also have a number of grammatical errors throughout this such as run-on sentences (the first sentence is an example), missing punctuation (especially after parentheses), and missing words (such as in the last sentence). Once you take care of the larger structural issues (reorganizing the introduction and introducing your opinion earlier), I would recommend reading this out loud to yourself. Doing so will help you notice a lot of errors you would otherwise miss by reading silently.
And again, if you have any questions about anything I mentioned, please let me know.
Points: 72525
Reviews: 1220
Donate