When
two children, Erick, 5 and Ashlin, 3 were abandoned by their mother
in Mexico, their father decided to step in and help them by bringing
them across the border to their aunt, in Oakland. When they attempted
to go across the border without proper documents, they were stopped
and the father was deported, which broke their hearts and hopes.
(Scheerr, 2014) These unfortunate people came to America because they
were told it was the “Land of the Free” but when they
came to the border they were stopped. Is this the message that should
be shown to other countries? Wasn’t this country made to
welcome people in? Today, government officials are now offering to
seal the border in an attempt to end disputes. In reality, sealing
the border between the United States and Mexico shouldn’t be
permitted because it destroys the message of America being the “Land
of the Free”.
Any
fence can be climbed but the meaning of it is always there. As
Secretary of Homeland Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael
Chertoff (2007) put it, "I think the fence has come to assume a
certain kind of symbolic significance which should not obscure the
fact that it is a much more complicated problem than putting up a
fence which someone can climb over with a ladder or tunnel under with
a shovel." The wall would serve no purpose other than to show to
people from Central America that they aren’t welcome in
America. Such a message does not truly represent what the land of
opportunity is supposed to be about. The States shouldn’t stand
for a message such as this. Instead, America should show a message in
which everyone is welcome.
The
idea of this message is why many Mexicans would want to move to the
United States. According to Pew Research (2009), 1/3 Mexicans would
want to migrate to the United States with 18% of them willing to do
it illegally. They want the chances of the State’s economic
opportunity, so they can provide for themselves and their families.
Since Mexico is a stage 2 country the death rates are decreasing and
so it is harder for their economy to provide for them with the
massive amounts of people. The wall that could be build would just
make more families go into poverty and it would show to the children
of these families that they aren’t welcome into the land of
opportunity. These children will never get to have the benefits of
more fortunate children in the United States.
Overall,
the 2000 mile border between the United States and Mexico shouldn’t
be build. It creates not so much a physical border but a symbolic
border on what could be the “land of opportunity” for the
people of Mexico, giving them the wrong idea about America. Mexico
has not been doing well with their economy and they need the United
States to help support themselves. These people may go to America to
seek economic opportunity for themselves and families. If they are
forced to stay in Mexico because of the border, they might have a lot
of trouble with finding a way to stay out of poverty. The message on
what America is that is given to these family is not “The Land
of the Free” or “The Land of Opportunity”. With
that border blocking the way, the Mexican families think of the
States as “the land that is blocked from them”. Should
this wall really need to be installed? Does this message really need
to be shown to the poor people who just want a better life?
*I
have some things that I would like edited specifically on this such
as:
- Grammar(tenses,
my use of personal pronouns, subject-verb agreement, pronoun
agreement, a passive voice and sentence structure)
- Good
Transitions
- Good
Topic Sentences
- Correct
use of commas(be as picky as you want)
- Tone(I
am aiming to be serious)
- Should
my title be in quotation marks or not?
- Overall,
my focus on the subject!* Thanks! :D
Points: 20
Reviews: 317
Donate