Hello.
I have to say, I agree with Ben. It "is a very emotive piece"; unfortunately, it seems full of overkill, dramatization. Then again, I'm a picky person when it comes to romance in literature or films. I only want the best and the best is hard to find.
I'd suggest pulling back a bit. Think on your subject, think on how it would make yourself or a specific narrator feel instead of going all willy-nilly, world-is-ending--unless that's your narrator? If that's your narrator, I'd choose a different narrator. It just makes it seem meaningless. It's like when you say a word too many times and it sounds like madness, like something unreal. The word's still the same thing it's always been, but it's been made useless through repetition. In this, you don't repeat, it's all about self-harm, self-destruction in all forms, all because of heartbreak.
As a person who has dealt with depression and self-harm, I assume a heartbreak could cause an increased problem, could be a catalyst, but everything about the piece shouts drama. I can't relate.
There are good parts to this piece, sometimes your imagery is beautiful and the pace at time is perfect, a chaotic tornado of rage at another person seems caught up in it. On the other hand, sometimes you speed by things of importance. This is why I think you should really claw your way into the narrator's head and get specific, as specific as possible. Force us to stare at things we don't like to look at; show us anguish.
Don't just skim the surface, because I have hope you can achieve prompting much more emotion out of a person. I suggest thinking more on the title, considering why you chose it, and focusing on writing more like this stanza:
"You've broken a fragile soul
and deflated my hoping heart
doused the dancing flame
blew the bulb
there's no more light behind my eyes."
P.S. Listen to Ben when it comes to grammar! I noticed a typo or two myself.
Keep writing and good luck with life,
Cas
Points: 771
Reviews: 180
Donate