Young Writers Society

Home » Forums » Resources » Knowledge Base » Writing Tutorials

Reading Awful Books Improves Writing



User avatar
59 Reviews



Gender: Female
Points: 4238
Reviews: 59
Mon May 16, 2016 11:04 am
Sunshine1113 says...



Stephen King wrote:“If you don't have time to read, you don't have the time (or the tools) to write. Simple as that."


One of the first things I was told on how to improve my writing was to read, which is a very good piece of advice. Reading does improve your writing. You adopt things the author uses, get ideas, improve word choice and sentence structure, and you can even find your writing niche!

Your first thoughts are most likely to read books by all of the greats, from J.K. Rowling to Stephen King; you want to be just like them, so of course your first act is to read books from all these amazing writers. They're to be worshipped for having created all these captivating, fantastical worlds, and you can't put their books down. You tear their works apart, analyzing them, hoping to pick up on things that will make you like them — a successful author.

I will reiterate: reading good quality stories can make you a better writer, but so can reading awful pieces of literature that are so dull and poorly edited that you wonder how they ever got published.

Reading those books is actually very helpful to you as a writer. These books stand as a perfect example of what not to do when you write.

It's just as important to know what to do when you're writing as it is to know what not to do.

However, such kinds of book can be really hard to get through, which is why sporking websites exist! Appreciate these sites! Those people purposely read awful works and analyze them line by line in order to flat out tell you what not to do so you don't have to read the book! These sporking sites may include content such as has been outlined below:

Urban Dictionary wrote:"A line by line critical analysis of fanfiction, typically of the Utterly Horrible or occasionally So Bad It's Good variety. Derived from the term "Sporking one's eyes out", implying that the fic is so bad that most people would prefer to attack their own eyes with sporks rather than read it. Also the verb for performing such an analysis."


Most of the sporks are actually very comical to read, too!

The sites for sporks are as given below:

http://impishidea.com/
http://battlefieldspork.blogspot.com/p/table-of-contents.htmlhttp://missionspork.blogspot.com/p/table-of-contents.html
http://armedwithsporks.livejournal.com/

So go on and read those books that make you want to "spork your eyes out" for being so bad, and be sure to take notes; your readers will love you all the more for it!
  





User avatar
47 Reviews



Gender: Male
Points: 107
Reviews: 47
Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:18 am
Jyva says...



if you're good enough to see what's wrong with those awful books, then... you're not really learning anything from them, are you? you already know what's wrong. they're more of a reminder of what not to do, really.

if anything you'd pick up bad writing habits from those books.
:)
  





User avatar
1220 Reviews



Gender: None specified
Points: 72525
Reviews: 1220
Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:48 pm
View Likes
Kale says...



I disagree, mainly because knowing that something is bad is different from knowing why and how it is bad. To use a food analogy, anyone can taste a dish and tell if it's good or bad, but it takes extra skill to determine why the taste is bad, and it takes even greater skill to determine how to avoid or even remedy the badness.

Analyzing what caused something to be bad helps you to avoid creating something as bad yourself.
Secretly a Kyllorac, sometimes a Murtle.
There are no chickens in Hyrule.
Princessence: A LMS Project
WRFF | KotGR
  





User avatar
9 Reviews



Gender: Female
Points: 602
Reviews: 9
Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:22 am
View Likes
heath says...



whenever i read a horrible book that makes me want to "spork my eyes out" i automatically start analyzing what made that book so darn bad ( mainly so i can tell absolutely everyone about how awful it was and why it was so awful ), and it really does help a lot.
  








Patience is the strength of the weak, impatience is the weakness of the strong.
— Immanuel Kant, Philosopher