z
Sureal wrote:Personally, I wish she'd made it more obvious in the actual books. That'd have made Dumbledore's fight with (and subsequent killing of) Grindelwald so much more emotional and meaningful.
As it is, I agree with Suzanne - it feels so tacked on.
Oh, and I just have to add: flytodreams, that's a little immature, don't you think?
Cpt. Smurf wrote:Although, looking back on it (for those of us with a considerable level of immaturity), the statement from Griselda Marchbanks, in book 5 during Harry's OWLs, that Dumbledore had "...done things with a wand I'd never seen before" could perhaps be interpreted as a suggestion towards his sexuality XD
Fantasyartist wrote:Hey, I've noticed that a lot of people said Dumbledore killed Grindlewald. Actually he didn't, in fact he's still alive by book 7 though Voldemort finishes him off when he tries to stop him getting the Elder wand. He's locked away in Nuremburg (I think).
Cpt. Smurf wrote:Although, looking back on it (for those of us with a considerable level of immaturity), the statement from Griselda Marchbanks, in book 5 during Harry's OWLs, that Dumbledore had "...done things with a wand I'd never seen before" could perhaps be interpreted as a suggestion towards his sexuality XD
I don't see what the big hooplah is, really. It's just a character trait. BFD. It's nothing worth getting your britches in a bunch over.
Gender:
Points: 1090
Reviews: 241