Dreamy115 wrote:Gulford's eyes had a faraway look to them, and when he spoke, his voice was melodic, the voice of a story-teller; it was deep and reverberated around the room, it held authority and it demanded attention. It was the voice of a king.
"It was before dawn, when the grass was misty with dew. A few hours until the sun graced this part of the continent with its kiss of light."
I agree with the "faraway" part, but the reason why I kept the dialogue part of the paragraph is because that's the way it should be - the reader reads about his voice, and then he speaks
"The wind bit harshly at unprotected skin, leaving the men drenched in a cold sweat. The gathered army made hardly a sound, bar save the odd whinny of a horse, or the clink of chainmail."
That does sound better
The king's general gave Gulford a sharp glance and frowned, but he dared not speak.
Oops, tense change.
Gulford continued effortlessly, "And his trusted General told him thus: We have come too far, your majesty, to turn back now. It will cast doubt amongst the minds of your people about your decisions. And moved his brown mare closer: The last thing we need is a revolt." "And his trusted General told him thus: 'We have come too far, your majesty, to turn back now. It will cast doubt amongst the minds of your people about your decisions.' He moved his brown mare closer.'The last thing we need is a revolt.'"
I left this in italics because speech within speech is not only confusing, but too heavy and cumbersome for the reader to have to trawl through.
"Or a traitor giving away their position." Gulford said angrily.
Was trying to avoid too many adverbs.
"The first row of the conscripted men were shot down from the archers in the towers of the castle; some were set on fire by burning pitch, and the stench of burning flesh filled the air..."
*sigh* I always confuse were and was, even though I know which one is right to use.
Adding to this turmoil was the fact that the General had become seperated from his King. The army was not only divided by force, but by leader.
lol you didn't point this out, but I just noticed that "separated" is spelled wrong.
Before the Bazynteen king could help himself, he asked, "How did you - ?"
GAH! Another Bazynteen miss. I even ctrl-f'd that word!
"There is honour even amongst thieves." When Harry didn't rise to the bait, the king of Azryl (He's the king of Azryl, right?) steeled his will, "I will give you half my land, without the need for any more fighting."
... I'm so annoyed. Again
"I could kill you all now and claim all of your land as mine."
I had "And" because he is essentially saying, "So?" with the word "and"
The standard bearer nodded meekly (one can't nod sickly. He can have "nodded, sickened." or have "nodded meekly", as I changed it to.), mounted one of the last remaining mares and fled to the nearby castle.
lol, you're right
Trumpets sounded from the top of the battlements of the castle as the standard bearer returned with the youngest prince of Cruciot wrapped in a blanket, a small circlet of gold around the boy's head. King Harry didn't even look so much as spare a glance at his son as the man got off his horse and nervously handed the child over to General Bane. Everyone watching expected the deliverer to be attacked at the last second.
I like your version better
Men shifted awkwardly, trying to stay in position, others twitched; their hands hovering over the hilts of their weapons and then dropping back by their sides, repeating the cycle over and over.
Yup, thanks
General Bane's suspicion heightened and he tightened his hold on the infant in his arms, "My Lord, this doesn't look or feel right. It's too easy."
Mmmk.
The king and his general were the only two left on horses; the entire cavalry lost when men in trenches rose hidden rows of stakes for the horses to impale themselves on. the entire cavalry had lost theirs when the men in the trenches had risen the hidden rows of stakes. (we already know that the horses are dead, we don't need to say they were impaled on top of that.)The Cruciot army followed close behind, with the king in the lead.
I'll try and find a way to make that sound/read better then
Time stood still, frozen, as the two Kings' eyes met, clashing like the blades of the warriors around them.
I really need to tighten my use of tense
He listlessly turned his head to see General Bane was yanking violently at his sleeve, screaming obscenities and what appeared to be nonsense into his King's ear.
*nods*
So, this was very well written. Your main problems were that you jumped around in the tenses a lot. I don't think I caught all of your mistakes in that. If you're writing in past tense, stick with it. Same with present. You also throw a huge amount of information at us at once. One would really have to work, like I did, to keep up with everything that's going on. You don't want to dizzy your readers. Stop to clarify and give us a break from those thick blocks of text.
Okay, thanks Dreamy. I'll try to figure out how I can lessen the information overload, or at least distribute the information out a bit more to make it easier to read. Regarding the tense changes, yeah, I really need to fix that up, thanks for picking up the more obvious ones.
I really like how your storyline is going. Keep it up. However, I really must admit, that I don't like King Harry's name. It doesn't sound scary.... it sounds silly. He needs a more frightening, intimidating name. King Harry sounds like a cartoon character, not a formidable, cruel tyrant.
lol yeah, a lot of people thought his name was a joke. Have you got any suggestions as to what a king's name should be?
I hope you develop more on Andonis. Is he going to be the main character? because that seems like it would work best for your story's plot.
Thank you for your review, Dreamy, you picked up on some small but important slips
- Jai





