





So, comments, questions, critiques. I would love them all. Tell me what I can improve on too. I'm gonna try to post on here more regularly and try to work on my 'skill' (if there is any) a little more...






Solvalery wrote:Beautiful photos, really beautiful quality too. Ummm... Could you tell me what camera are you using?
campergirl wrote:Hey I love these!! What kind of camera do you have?
Tabithalillian wrote:Solvalery wrote:Beautiful photos, really beautiful quality too. Ummm... Could you tell me what camera are you using?
Thanks so much! I am using a Nikon D3000. It is a lovely camera, I am just using the standard lens it comes with in the photos too.
Shepherd wrote:Some of these are really great! I'll go through and critique them one-by-one.
1) This might be my favorite. In some of the others, your light seems a little blue, which eats up some of the nice contrast you have. In this one, though, your focus is good and the highlights are solid (and have a vaguely warm look to them, which counteracts the blueness). I think I would have liked to see you frame it a little differently, so that we don't have the gap beneath her belly and leg near the middle bottom. However, all-in-all, I like this photograph.
2) I like the composition here a little bit better, but to me it seems extremely blue. When shooting in low light, this often happens...have you tried manually adjusting your light settings and adding a little red to counteract this? Otherwise it's a neat photograph, and certainly more creative than the first, I think. One thing that does bother me, though, is that you haven't straightened the step in your post-shot editing process. This makes everything feel tilted and really takes away from the impact of your image.
3) For some reason, there's something about this that just seems uninteresting. I think the concept is great, and looking back I can't see quite why it doesn't appeal to me. I think maybe it's a little flat, and there is no standout focal point to draw the eye. It's a very staticky sort of picture, but the idea is great. Maybe change your framing, adjust your light (it's a little monochromatic at the moment), and reevaluate what drew you to this concept in the first place.
4) This is okay. It's a little run-of-the-mill, and the big, amorphous dark patch in the bottom left is just distracting. Not my type of photo, really, although your composition is sound.
5) Low light again. There are no highlights here to make this an eye-catching photo, and so it turns out feeling washed out and a little "blah." Especially with flower photos, you have to have something that just immediately drags the viewer in, and I don't think this has that particular quality. It's a nice picture, just a little ordinary.
6) I like this one a lot better. You've put the focus in an odd place, which pulls the eye in a different way than it would had you focused on the closer flower. My only issue here is that, seeing the quality of your camera and its ability to focus, it still seems a little blurry at the focal point. If you made that just a little crisper it would be much more effective next time. But really this is an especially good photo.
7) Eh. It's hard to see what's going on here, and once we do, it's not a very interesting photo. I'm not a fan of ants, but I still don't find any artistic merit in seeing them crushed? =P
Anyway, these are very, very nice. Good job!