Things Science Can't Explain

52 posts1, 2, 3, 4
User avatar
Gender Male
Points 4141
Reviews 16
Like too old, I mean

In July, 1877, four prospectors were looking for gold and silver outcroppings in a desolate, hilly area near the head of Spring Valley, not far from Eureka, Nevada. Scanning the rocks, one of the men spotted something peculiar projecting from a high ledge. Climbing up to get a better look, the prospector was surprised to find a human legbone and knee cap sticking out of solid rock. He called to his companions, and together they dislodged the oddity with picks. Realizing they had a most unusual find, the men brought it into Eureka, where it was placed on display.

The stone in which the bones were embedded was a hard, dark red quartzite, and the bones themselves were almost black with carbonization - indicative of great age. When the surrounding stone was carefully chipped away, the specimen was found to be composed of a leg bone broken off four inches above the knee, the knee cap and joint, the lower leg bones, and the complete bones of the foot. Several medical doctors examined the remains, and were convinced that anatomically they had indeed once belonged to a human being, and a very modern-looking one. But an intriguing aspect of the bones was their size: from knee to heel they measured 39 inches. Their owner in life had thus stood over 12 feet tall. Compounding the mystery further was the fact that the rock in which the bones were found was dated geologically to he era of the dinosaurs, the Jurassic - over 185 million years old. The local papers ran several stories on the marvelous find, and two museums sent investigators to see if any more of the skeleton could be located. Unfortunately, nothing else but the leg and foot existed in the rock.


The problem here is that the general scientific community (aside from a few "young earth" christian fundamentalists who are generally regarded as complete idiots anyway) has accepted that the modern day human species is only between 40-60,000 years old. Perplexing

But wait, there's more!

The next and last skeletal find takes us another quantum leap in geologic time, and plunges us even deeper into the earth's strata. A Scientific American article published in 1880 reprinted the particulars of a discovery made in the spring of that year, reported in the St. Louis Republican. Dr. R.W. Booth, who operated an iron mine about 3 miles from Dry Branch, in Franklin County, Missouri, unearthed from a depth of 18 feet a human skull, portions of ribs, vertebrae and a collar bone. With them were two barbed arrowheads of flint, and pieces of charcoal. Dr. Booth realized the significance of all this, but was frustrated when at just a touch the skull crumbled to dust, and the other bones likewise broke into pieces. But these pieces nevertheless told their story: Later analysis showed they were definitely human. Two and a half weeks later, Dr. Booth reached a level of 24 feet, and found more of the same skeleton - a thigh bone, vertebrae, and more charred wood. What is more, the remains were found resting on a layer of iron ore, which bore the impressions of coarse matting. One could still see the marks of criss-crossing fibers. What astounded Booth was that the layer in which both portions were dug up was the second or saccharoidal sandstone of the Lower Silurian - dated an incredible 425 million years old.

Let me repeat that: 425 million years. We have gone far beyond the purported age of human culture, of man himself, the apes, all mammals, even the age of the dinosaurs. According to evolutionary theory, the Silurian age saw the advent of life on land and was in fact more than two-thirds of the way back to the supposed advent of life itself. But what are the remains of man and his products doing at this level? Something, certainly, is very wrong.


http://home.att.net/~creationoutreach/pages/strange.htm
I owe everybody who gives me feedback one critique on a fiction work of their choice. Just give me a pm with a link and I'll critique whatever fiction piece you want.


See my blog for more details




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 37408
Reviews 182
Hm that long post reminds me of a kid in my Environmental Science class who goes a bit overboard in his debates against religion. He just drones on and on. And I can't help but feel that he just makes up a lot of it. The guy likes to compare Christianity to pagan religions. Like for example, he compared Jesus to Horace, an Egyptian Sun God or something.

I agree with some of his views, but the guy just goes off the wall with his Atheist beliefs. Enough is enough at any given point. If an argument is reaching no climax than it is best to end, seeing as neither side is showing any sign of reaching a new revelation in their own personal philosophical minds. :)
"Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives by believing in me will never die. Do you believe this?”
-John 11:25-26




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 4141
Reviews 16
AspiringAuthorA..M. wrote:Hm that long post reminds me of a kid in my Environmental Science class who goes a bit overboard in his debates against religion. He just drones on and on. And I can't help but feel that he just makes up a lot of it. The guy likes to compare Christianity to pagan religions. Like for example, he compared Jesus to Horace, an Egyptian Sun God or something.

I agree with some of his views, but the guy just goes off the wall with his Atheist beliefs. Enough is enough at any given point. If an argument is reaching no climax than it is best to end, seeing as neither side is showing any sign of reaching a new revelation in their own personal philosophical minds. :)


I was gonna ask you what this has to do with my post but then I took a closer look at the source. lol I thought the author was just reporting strange scientific observations but it turns out he's trying to refute legitimate scientific claims.

As for your guy who likes to argue religion, most kids who call themselves atheist don't know they heads from their ...(I can't cuss on this site like I normally would). Religious zealots irritate the hell outta me with their ridiculous claims, but not as much as self-proclaimed "free thinking" atheists.

I've heard that Jesus to Horace argument before and I've also seen it dismissed as complete bs. The person making the argument is claiming that there are dozens if not hundreds of "jesus like" deities throughout history who were supposedly born of a virgin mother and crucified. They say Horace was crucified, which he wasn't. They also say the same about Vishnu's avatar Krishna, which anyone who knows anything about Vaishnavic Hinduism will tell you is completely false.

Your guy prolly read that false info off a forum or something. People like that piss me off cuz they make those of us who actually know what we're talkin about look stupid. The same type of "atheist" who thinks the Big Bang was an actual explosion. Or that evolution means we descended from monkeys. Retards.
I owe everybody who gives me feedback one critique on a fiction work of their choice. Just give me a pm with a link and I'll critique whatever fiction piece you want.


See my blog for more details




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 1212
Reviews 5
Hey guys! I read about the whole atheist thing, and I too thing thats really dumb.

First off, I know a tad about Egyptian religion. Horace was not the son of the creator. All the religions of the world are not like Christianity, only two are. I think saying that is idiotic.
Nerdfighters UNITE! DFTBA!




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 37408
Reviews 182
pandacary wrote:Hey guys! I read about the whole atheist thing, and I too thing thats really dumb.

First off, I know a tad about Egyptian religion. Horace was not the son of the creator. All the religions of the world are not like Christianity, only two are. I think saying that is idiotic.



That caught my attention. Which two are they?
"Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die; and whoever lives by believing in me will never die. Do you believe this?”
-John 11:25-26




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 2856
Reviews 15
Judaism and Islam? They are the three Abrahamic religions, and they're loaded with similarities.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you've read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense."
-Buddha




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 4141
Reviews 16
Francis Michael Buck wrote:Judaism and Islam? They are the three Abrahamic religions, and they're loaded with similarities.


That's because they all come from the same place (abraham). Christianity started out as a cult of Judaism and in Islam Jesus (Issa) is a prophet but not the son of God.

There are also the similarities between the Bible and the Koran. By that I mean the Jewish Bible (TaNaK) not the Christian Bible. The Jews believe that first there was God and he created the Torah which is revealed in Hebrew and Aramaic. When the Torah is revealed in the Jewish language it serves as an endless cryptic well of knowledge which can be read on different levels.
The Koran is similar because it is said that the Koran cannot be translated, because only when it is revealed in the Arabic language can it be read on the different levels of interpretation.

The New Testament of the Bible is not cryptic, because it was first written in Greek simply because it was the most common language at the time. After it was first written it was translated into Latin, Aramaic and later English. I wish I could read Arabic.
I owe everybody who gives me feedback one critique on a fiction work of their choice. Just give me a pm with a link and I'll critique whatever fiction piece you want.


See my blog for more details



You don't need to follow me! You don't need to follow anybody! You got to think for yourselves!
— Brian Cohen