the cheek pocket on the last one seems a bit deep to me.
But thats probably just my monitor.
You shouldn't judge a book by it's cover, instead, you should read every single book to see what every book is about before you even come close to judging its viability.
Uhm...Huh? You coloured these..by hand..using a computer programme? *isn't convinced*
"Sometimes we see a cloud that's dragonish,
A vapour sometimes like a bear or lion,
A towered citadel, a pendant rock,
A forked mountain, or blue promontory,
With trees upon't that nod unto the world,And mock our eyes with air.."
its called a tablet most likely
If its not by hand, then what is it by? Feet?
and Ive only seen portraits so far. They are very well done and magazine quality.
But they're really really soft, more than usual. Not exactly my taste.
Last edited by Sponson Light on Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You shouldn't judge a book by it's cover, instead, you should read every single book to see what every book is about before you even come close to judging its viability.
You can always start by learning the human anatomy.
After your sketches resemble something (or resemble something extremely specific) color is usually the next step (assuming you know how light works)
Your pictures remind me of Galatea's plea of boycotting Victoria's Secret, I dont know why.
They just seem........ like fake humans, a doll of some sort.
They're done nicely, like the anatomy is all done well and proportionate.
But its the fakeness of it.
You shouldn't judge a book by it's cover, instead, you should read every single book to see what every book is about before you even come close to judging its viability.
.
